* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_fp_comp2): New.

* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s:  New.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Law 1999-08-28 06:18:40 +00:00
parent ceaa7778c0
commit 0791df6ce3
3 changed files with 94 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
Sat Aug 28 00:16:12 1999 Jerry Quinn <jquinn@nortelnetworks.com>
* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/basic.exp (do_fp_comp2): New.
* gas/testsuite/gas/hppa/basic/fp_comp2.s: New.
1999-08-20 Alan Modra <alan@spri.levels.unisa.edu.au>
* gas/i386/general.s, gas/i386/general.l: Add .code16gcc

View File

@ -1752,6 +1752,53 @@ proc do_fp_comp {} {
if [expr $x==55] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_fp_comp2 {} {
set testname "fp_comp2.s: fp_comp2 tests"
set x 0
gas_start "fp_comp2.s" "-al"
# Check the assembled instruction against a table built by the HP assembler
# Any differences should be checked by hand -- with the number of problems
# I've seen in the HP assembler I don't completely trust it.
#
# Instead of having a variable for each match string just increment the
# total number of matches seen. That's simpler when testing large numbers
# of instructions (as these tests to).
while 1 {
expect {
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0000 B8AA638E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0004 B8AA6A0E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0008 BA5B2595\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 000c BA5B2C15\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0010 B8AA63AE\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0014 B8AA6A2E\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0018 BA5B25B5\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 001c BA5B2C35\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0020 38A0C04A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0024 30A0C80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0028 30A0D80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 002c 3A80C098\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0030 3280C818\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0034 38A0E04A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0038 30A0E80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 003c 30A0F80A\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0040 3A80E098\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "^ +\[0-9\]+ 0044 3280E818\[^\n\]*\n" { set x [expr $x+1] }
-re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
timeout { perror "timeout\n"; break }
eof { break }
}
}
# This was intended to do any cleanup necessary. It kinda looks like it
# isn't needed, but just in case, please keep it in for now.
gas_finish
# Did we find what we were looking for? If not, flunk it.
if [expr $x==18] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
proc do_fp_conv {} {
set testname "fp_conv.s: fp_conv tests"
set x 0
@ -2259,4 +2306,7 @@ if [istarget hppa*-*-*] then {
# Test that we correctly assemble some FP memory tests which
# L/R register selects. (Regression test for a bug Tege found).
do_fmem_LR_tests
# PA2.0 tests
do_fp_comp2
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
.LEVEL 2.0
.SPACE $PRIVATE$
.SUBSPA $DATA$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31
.SUBSPA $BSS$,QUAD=1,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=31,ZERO,SORT=82
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $LIT$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44
.SUBSPA $CODE$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44,CODE_ONLY
.SPACE $TEXT$
.SUBSPA $CODE$
.align 4
; Basic immediate instruction tests.
;
; We could/should test some of the corner cases for register and
; immediate fields. We should also check the assorted field
; selectors to make sure they're handled correctly.
fmpyfadd,sgl %fr5R,%fr10L,%fr13R,%fr14L
fmpyfadd,dbl %fr5,%fr10,%fr13,%fr14
fmpyfadd,sgl %fr18R,%fr27L,%fr6R,%fr21L
fmpyfadd,dbl %fr18,%fr27,%fr6,%fr21
fmpynfadd,sgl %fr5R,%fr10L,%fr13R,%fr14L
fmpynfadd,dbl %fr5,%fr10,%fr13,%fr14
fmpynfadd,sgl %fr18R,%fr27L,%fr6R,%fr21L
fmpynfadd,dbl %fr18,%fr27,%fr6,%fr21
fneg,sgl %fr5,%fr10R
fneg,dbl %fr5,%fr10
fneg,quad %fr5,%fr10
fneg,sgl %fr20R,%fr24L
fneg,dbl %fr20,%fr24
fnegabs,sgl %fr5,%fr10R
fnegabs,dbl %fr5,%fr10
fnegabs,quad %fr5,%fr10
fnegabs,sgl %fr20R,%fr24L
fnegabs,dbl %fr20,%fr24