Multiple Ada task-specific breakpoints at the same address.
With the test changed as in the patch, against current mainline, we get: (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: info tasks before inserting breakpoint break break_me task 1 Breakpoint 2 at 0x4030b0: file /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks/foo.adb, line 27. (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: break break_me task 1 break break_me task 3 Note: breakpoint 2 also set at pc 0x4030b0. Breakpoint 3 at 0x4030b0: file /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks/foo.adb, line 27. (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: break break_me task 3 continue Continuing. [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7dc7700 (LWP 27133)] Breakpoint 2, foo.break_me () at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks/foo.adb:27 27 null; (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: continue to breakpoint info tasks ID TID P-ID Pri State Name 1 63b010 48 Waiting on RV with 3 main_task 2 63bd80 1 48 Accept or Select Term task_list(1) * 3 63f510 1 48 Accepting RV with 1 task_list(2) 4 642ca0 1 48 Accept or Select Term task_list(3) (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: info tasks after hitting breakpoint The breakpoint that caused a stop is breakpoint 3, but GDB end up reporting (and running breakpoint commands of) "Breakpoint 2" instead. The issue is that the bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions logic of "wrong thread" is missing the "wrong task" check. This is usually harmless, because the thread hop code in infrun.c code that handles wrong-task-hitting-breakpoint does check for task-specific breakpoints (within breakpoint_thread_match): /* Check if a regular breakpoint has been hit before checking for a potential single step breakpoint. Otherwise, GDB will not see this breakpoint hit when stepping onto breakpoints. */ if (regular_breakpoint_inserted_here_p (aspace, stop_pc)) { if (!breakpoint_thread_match (aspace, stop_pc, ecs->ptid)) thread_hop_needed = 1; } IOW, usually, when one only has a task specific breakpoint at a given address, things work correctly. Put another task-specific or non-task-specific breakpoint there, and things break. A patch that eliminates the special thread hop code in infrun.c is what exposed this, as after that GDB solely relies on bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions to know whether the right or wrong task hit a breakpoint. IOW, given the latent bug, Ada task-specific breakpoints become non-task-specific, and that is caught by the testsuite, as: break break_me task 3 Breakpoint 2 at 0x4030b0: file /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks/foo.adb, line 27. (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: break break_me task 3 continue Continuing. [Switching to Thread 0x7ffff7fcb700 (LWP 17122)] Breakpoint 2, foo.break_me () at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks/foo.adb:27 27 null; (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: continue to breakpoint info tasks ID TID P-ID Pri State Name 1 63b010 48 Waiting on RV with 2 main_task * 2 63bd80 1 48 Accepting RV with 1 task_list(1) 3 63f510 1 48 Accept or Select Term task_list(2) 4 642ca0 1 48 Accept or Select Term task_list(3) (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/tasks.exp: info tasks after hitting breakpoint It was after seeing this that I thought of how to expose the bug with current mainline. Tested on x86_64 Fedora 17. gdb/ 2014-02-26 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * breakpoint.c (bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions): Handle task-specific breakpoints. gdb/testsuite/ 2014-02-26 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * gdb.ada/tasks.exp: Set a task-specific breakpoint at break_me that won't ever trigger. Make sure that GDB reports the correct breakpoint that caused the stop.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e3e3703534
commit
12ab52e977
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2014-02-26 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* breakpoint.c (bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions): Handle
|
||||
task-specific breakpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
2014-02-25 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* ia64-linux-nat.c (ia64_linux_xfer_partial): Reimplement
|
||||
|
@ -5159,7 +5159,6 @@ bpstat_check_watchpoint (bpstat bs)
|
||||
static void
|
||||
bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions (bpstat bs, ptid_t ptid)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int thread_id = pid_to_thread_id (ptid);
|
||||
const struct bp_location *bl;
|
||||
struct breakpoint *b;
|
||||
int value_is_zero = 0;
|
||||
@ -5184,9 +5183,12 @@ bpstat_check_breakpoint_conditions (bpstat bs, ptid_t ptid)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If this is a thread-specific breakpoint, don't waste cpu evaluating the
|
||||
condition if this isn't the specified thread. */
|
||||
if (b->thread != -1 && b->thread != thread_id)
|
||||
/* If this is a thread/task-specific breakpoint, don't waste cpu
|
||||
evaluating the condition if this isn't the specified
|
||||
thread/task. */
|
||||
if ((b->thread != -1 && b->thread != pid_to_thread_id (ptid))
|
||||
|| (b->task != 0 && b->task != ada_get_task_number (ptid)))
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
bs->stop = 0;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||
2014-02-26 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdb.ada/tasks.exp: Set a task-specific breakpoint at break_me
|
||||
that won't ever trigger. Make sure that GDB reports the correct
|
||||
breakpoint that caused the stop.
|
||||
|
||||
2014-02-25 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR gdb/16626
|
||||
|
@ -37,15 +37,35 @@ gdb_test "info tasks" \
|
||||
"\r\n"] \
|
||||
"info tasks before inserting breakpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
# Now, insert a breakpoint that should stop only if task 3 stops.
|
||||
gdb_test "break break_me task 3" "Breakpoint .* at .*"
|
||||
# Insert a breakpoint that should stop only if task 1 stops. Since
|
||||
# task 1 never calls break_me, this shouldn't actually ever trigger.
|
||||
# The fact that this breakpoint is created _before_ the next one
|
||||
# matters. GDB used to have a bug where it would report the first
|
||||
# breakpoint in the list that matched the triggered-breakpoint's
|
||||
# address, no matter which task it was specific to.
|
||||
gdb_test "break break_me task 1" "Breakpoint .* at .*"
|
||||
|
||||
# Now, insert a breakpoint that should stop only if task 3 stops, and
|
||||
# extract its number.
|
||||
set bp_number -1
|
||||
set test "break break_me task 3"
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple $test $test {
|
||||
-re "Breakpoint (.*) at .*$gdb_prompt $" {
|
||||
set bp_number $expect_out(1,string)
|
||||
pass $test
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if {$bp_number < 0} {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Continue to that breakpoint. Task 2 should hit it first, and GDB
|
||||
# is expected to ignore that hit and resume the execution. Only then
|
||||
# task 3 will hit our breakpoint, and GDB is expected to stop at that
|
||||
# point.
|
||||
# point. Also make sure that GDB reports the correct breakpoint number.
|
||||
gdb_test "continue" \
|
||||
".*Breakpoint.*, foo.break_me \\(\\).*" \
|
||||
".*Breakpoint $bp_number, foo.break_me \\(\\).*" \
|
||||
"continue to breakpoint"
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that it is indeed task 3 that hit the breakpoint by checking
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user