OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't complain about 

unresolved debugging relocs in dynamic applications.
	* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-sparc.c (sparc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-x86-64.c (elf64_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
Alan Modra 2002-07-11 05:33:28 +00:00
parent 7e8d4ab4d1
commit 239e1f3afa
8 changed files with 39 additions and 29 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
bfd/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
2002-07-11 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't complain about
unresolved debugging relocs in dynamic applications.
* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elf64-sparc.c (sparc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf64_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.
2002-07-10 Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
* elf64-ppc.c (ONES): Define.

11
bfd/elf32-i386.c
View File

@ -2737,14 +2737,11 @@ elf_i386_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs for
R_386_32 above in debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)?
If we had emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the
fudge here. */
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),

6
bfd/elf32-s390.c
View File

@ -1971,9 +1971,11 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),

7
bfd/elf32-sparc.c
View File

@ -1561,10 +1561,11 @@ elf32_sparc_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* ??? Copied from elf32-i386.c, debugging section check and all. */
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),

10
bfd/elf64-ppc.c
View File

@ -5907,13 +5907,11 @@ ppc64_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs above in
debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)? If we had
emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the fudge here. */
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
{
(*_bfd_error_handler)

6
bfd/elf64-s390.c
View File

@ -1935,9 +1935,11 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),

6
bfd/elf64-sparc.c
View File

@ -2568,9 +2568,11 @@ sparc64_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),

11
bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
View File

@ -1938,14 +1938,11 @@ elf64_x86_64_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
break;
}
/* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs for
R_386_32 above in debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)?
If we had emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the
fudge here. */
/* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
not process them. */
if (unresolved_reloc
&& !(info->shared
&& (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
&& (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
(*_bfd_error_handler)
(_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),