* gdbint.texinfo (Breakpoint Handling): Correct a double negative.

This commit is contained in:
Theodore A. Roth 2003-05-14 20:29:15 +00:00
parent de18ac1fab
commit 50e3ee830c
2 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2003-05-14 Theodore A. Roth <troth@openavr.org>
* gdbint.texinfo (Breakpoint Handling): Correct a double negative.
2003-05-10 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* Makefile.in (gdb-cfg.texi): Replace $$LN_S with $(LN_S).

View File

@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ A third possibility is that the target already has the ability to do
breakpoints somehow; for instance, a ROM monitor may do its own
software breakpoints. So although these are not literally ``hardware
breakpoints'', from @value{GDBN}'s point of view they work the same;
@value{GDBN} need not do nothing more than set the breakpoint and wait
@value{GDBN} need not do anything more than set the breakpoint and wait
for something to happen.
Since they depend on hardware resources, hardware breakpoints may be