Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on MinGW
Recent MinGW versions require -lssp when using _FORTIFY_SOURCE, which gdb does (in common-defs.h) https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/5868#issuecomment-544107564 To avoid all the complications with checking for -lssp and making sure it's linked statically, just don't define it. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-01-09 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com> * gdbsupport/common-defs.h: Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on MinGW. Change-Id: Ide6870ab57198219a2ef78bc675768a789ca2b1d
This commit is contained in:
parent
3061113bf3
commit
5f23a08201
|
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
|||
2020-01-09 Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdbsupport/common-defs.h: Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on MinGW.
|
||||
|
||||
2020-01-08 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* thread.c (print_thread_info_1): Fix indentation.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -66,9 +66,13 @@
|
|||
plus this seems like a reasonable safety measure. The check for
|
||||
optimization is required because _FORTIFY_SOURCE only works when
|
||||
optimization is enabled. If _FORTIFY_SOURCE is already defined,
|
||||
then we don't do anything. */
|
||||
then we don't do anything. Also, on MinGW, fortify requires
|
||||
linking to -lssp, and to avoid the hassle of checking for
|
||||
that and linking to it statically, we just don't define
|
||||
_FORTIFY_SOURCE there. */
|
||||
|
||||
#if !defined _FORTIFY_SOURCE && defined __OPTIMIZE__ && __OPTIMIZE__ > 0
|
||||
#if (!defined _FORTIFY_SOURCE && defined __OPTIMIZE__ && __OPTIMIZE__ > 0 \
|
||||
&& !defined(__MINGW32__))
|
||||
#define _FORTIFY_SOURCE 2
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue