OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

* gas/all/gas.exp: No longer expect difference of forward 

references to fail.
        * gas/all/x930509.s: Fix testcase to match how the expect code was
        written.
This commit is contained in:
Jeff Law 1994-01-13 20:01:22 +00:00
parent 63dcc38026
commit 644df6f6c2
2 changed files with 91 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
Thu Jan 13 11:59:22 1994 Jeffrey A. Law (law@snake.cs.utah.edu)
* gas/all/gas.exp: No longer expect difference of forward
references to fail.
* gas/all/x930509.s: Fix testcase to match how the expect code was
written.
Wed Jan 12 13:41:10 1994 Jeffrey A. Law (law@snake.cs.utah.edu)
* gas/hppa/reloc/reloc.exp: Fix typo in last change. Latest test
for cross-subspace call bugs is no longer expected to fail.
* gas/hppa/more.parse/procbug.s: Add test for another bug relating
to having a function's label follow the .PROC directive.

81
gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
#
# These tests should be valid on all targets.
#
# I think currently all targets fail this one when listings are enabled.
gas_test "p2425.s" "" "" "pcrel values in assignment"
# p1480.s uses a ".space" directive which for most assemblers means
# "allocate some space". On the PA it means "switch into this space".
#
# Therefore this test (as it is currently written) is completely bogus
# for any PA target. Do not bother trying to run it and just claim
# it fails.
if [istarget hppa*-*-*] then {
setup_xfail *-*-*
fail "simplifiable double subtraction"
setup_xfail *-*-*
fail "simplifiable double subtraction, with listings"
} else {
setup_xfail *-*-*
gas_test "p1480.s" "" "" "simplifiable double subtraction"
setup_xfail *-*-*
gas_test "p1480.s" "-a" "" "simplifiable double subtraction, with listings"
}
gas_test "float.s" "" "" "simple FP constants"
gas_test_error "diff1.s" "" "difference of two undefined symbols"
proc do_comment {} {
set testname "comment.s: comments in listings"
set x1 0
set x2 0
set x3 0
set white {[ \t]*}
gas_start "comment.s" "-al"
while 1 {
# Apparently CRLF is received when using ptys for subprocesses; hence the
# \r\n for line 3.
expect {
-re "^ +1\[ \t\]+# This\[^\n\]*\n" { set x1 1 }
-re "^ +2\[ \t\]+# correctly\[^\n\]*\n" { set x2 1 }
-re "^ +3\[ \t\]+/. C comments too. ./\r\n" { set x3 1 }
-re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
timeout { error "timeout\n"; break }
eof { break }
}
}
gas_finish
if [all_ones $x1 $x2 $x3] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
}
do_comment
#
# Test x930509a -- correct assembly of differences involving forward
# references.
#
proc do_930509a {} {
set testname "difference between forward references"
set x 0
gas_start "x930509.s" "-al"
while 1 {
# We need to accomodate both byte orders here.
# If ".long" means an 8-byte value on some target someday, this test will have
# to be fixed.
expect {
-re "^ +1 .... 00000000" { fail $testname; set x 1 }
-re "^ +1 .... 04000000" { pass $testname; set x 1 }
-re "^ +1 .... 00000004" { pass $testname; set x 1 }
-re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
timeout { error "timeout\n"; break }
eof { break }
}
}
gas_finish
if !$x then { fail $testname }
}
do_930509a