Update GDB 5 status.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Cagney
parent
80ce1ecb70
commit
67edb2c6ae
@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
|
||||
Wed Mar 29 13:40:40 2000 Andrew Cagney <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* TODO: Update GDB 5 status.
|
||||
|
||||
Wed Mar 29 10:16:35 2000 Andrew Cagney <cagney@b1.cygnus.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* breakpoint.h (remove_hw_watchpoints): Add declaration.
|
||||
|
||||
110
gdb/TODO
110
gdb/TODO
@ -62,23 +62,15 @@ Nick D's working through patches from Michael Snyder and Peter S.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Texinfo broken/builds (Andrew Cagney, Stan Shebs)
|
||||
|
||||
Cagney probably botched a fix to a botch.
|
||||
RFA: procfs.c: init_procfs_ops should set
|
||||
procfs_ops.to_has_[all]_memory (Peter Schauer, Andrew Cagney?)
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
I am pretty sure that this is caused by some accidental deletion, but
|
||||
procfs.c:init_procfs_ops no longer sets procfs_ops.to_has_memory and
|
||||
procfs_ops.to_has_all_memory.
|
||||
|
||||
x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00803.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
RFA: breakpoint.c: Minor output fixes for hardware watchpoints
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00558.html
|
||||
|
||||
During implementation of hardware watchpoints on Solaris, I noticed the
|
||||
following inconsistencies in breakpoint.c output between software and
|
||||
hardware breakpoints.
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg01057.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
@ -126,6 +118,12 @@ Pascal (Pierre Muller, David Taylor)
|
||||
The pascal support patches nave been added to the patch data base. I
|
||||
[cagney] strongly suspect that they are better suited for 5.1.
|
||||
|
||||
Indent -gnu ?
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00496.html
|
||||
|
||||
2 pascal language patches inserted in database
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00521.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Programs run under GDB have SIGCHLD masked.
|
||||
@ -198,6 +196,39 @@ after proceeding over a breakpoint on x86 targets.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
x86 linux GDB and SIGALRM (???)
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00803.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Migrate qfThreadInfo packet -> qThreadInfo. (Andrew Cagney)
|
||||
|
||||
Add support for packet enable/disable commands with these thread
|
||||
packets. General cleanup.
|
||||
|
||||
[PATCH] Document the ThreadInfo remote protocol queries
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00832.html
|
||||
|
||||
[PATCH] "info threads" queries for remote.c
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00831.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
MI documentation in GDB user guide. (Andrew Cagney, Elena Zannoni,
|
||||
Stan Shebs, anyone else?)
|
||||
|
||||
> (Are there plans to make gdbmi.texi be part of the manual as well?)
|
||||
|
||||
I'd like to see it go in there sooner rather than later too. Otherwise
|
||||
you're introducing discrepancies between the manual and the documentation,
|
||||
and everybody is confused - witness the lack of doc for the tracing
|
||||
commands still, some two years after they were added...
|
||||
|
||||
[PATCH] GDB command-line switches and annotations docs
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00639.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Won't have
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -232,6 +263,33 @@ Something to do post 5.0 branch
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Elimination of make_cleanup_func. (Andrew Cagney)
|
||||
|
||||
make_cleanup_func elimination
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00791.html
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00814.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Allow GDB to use installed regex. Think about updating regex to more
|
||||
recent version (Andrew Cagney).
|
||||
|
||||
Re: A new patch for regex
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00635.html
|
||||
|
||||
A patch for gnu-regex
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00568.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
ChangeLog.mi vs ChangeLog-mi (Andrew Cagney)
|
||||
Needs further debate.
|
||||
|
||||
Re: [PATCH] Add change-log variables to more MI files
|
||||
http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-q1/msg00811.html
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDB 5.0: Test results
|
||||
---------------------
|
||||
|
||||
@ -330,6 +388,30 @@ http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00025.html
|
||||
General Wish List
|
||||
=================
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
GDBARCH cleanup (Andrew Cagney)
|
||||
|
||||
The non-generated parts of gdbarch.{sh,h,c} should be separated out
|
||||
into gdbarch-utils.[hc] (Name ok).
|
||||
|
||||
The ``info architecture'' command should be replaced with a fixed
|
||||
``set architecture'' (implemented using the command.c enum code).
|
||||
|
||||
Document that gdbarch_init_ftype could easily fail because it didn't
|
||||
identify an architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
Check that GDB can handle all BFD architectures (Andrew Cagney)
|
||||
|
||||
There should be a test that checks that BFD/GDB are in sync with
|
||||
regard to architecture changes. Something like a test that first
|
||||
queries GDB for all supported architectures and then feeds each back
|
||||
to GDB.. Anyone interested in learning how to write tests? :-)
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
This list is probably not up to date, and opinions vary about the
|
||||
importance or even desirability of some of the items.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user