gdbserver/Linux: unbreak thread event randomization
Wanting to make sure the new continue-pending-status.exp test tests
both cases of threads 2 and 3 reporting an event, I added counters to
the test, to make it FAIL if events for both threads aren't seen.
Assuming a well behaved backend, and given a reasonable number of
iterations, it should PASS.
However, running that against GNU/Linux gdbserver, I found that
surprisingly, that FAILed. GDBserver always reported the breakpoint
hit for the same thread.
Turns out that I broke gdbserver's thread event randomization
recently, with git commit 582511be
([gdbserver] linux-low.c: better
starvation avoidance, handle non-stop mode too). In that commit I
missed that the thread structure also has a status_pending_p field...
The end result was that count_events_callback always returns 0, and
then if no thread is stepping, select_event_lwp always returns the
event thread. IOW, no randomization is happening at all. Quite
curious how all the other changes in that patch were sufficient to fix
non-stop-fair-events.exp anyway even with that broken.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* linux-low.c (count_events_callback, select_event_lwp_callback):
Use the lwp's status_pending_p field, not the thread's.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.threads/continue-pending-status.exp (saw_thread_2)
(saw_thread_3): New globals.
(top level): Increment them when an event for the corresponding
thread is seen.
(no thread starvation): New test.
This commit is contained in:
parent
eb54c8bf08
commit
8bf3b159e5
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* linux-low.c (count_events_callback, select_event_lwp_callback):
|
||||
Use the lwp's status_pending_p field, not the thread's.
|
||||
|
||||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* linux-nat.c (status_callback): Return early if the LWP has no
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* linux-low.c (count_events_callback, select_event_lwp_callback):
|
||||
Use the lwp's status_pending_p field, not the thread's.
|
||||
|
||||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* linux-low.c (select_event_lwp_callback): Update comments to
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2238,6 +2238,7 @@ static int
|
|||
count_events_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct thread_info *thread = (struct thread_info *) entry;
|
||||
struct lwp_info *lp = get_thread_lwp (thread);
|
||||
int *count = data;
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_assert (count != NULL);
|
||||
|
@ -2245,7 +2246,7 @@ count_events_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *data)
|
|||
/* Count only resumed LWPs that have an event pending. */
|
||||
if (thread->last_status.kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE
|
||||
&& thread->last_resume_kind != resume_stop
|
||||
&& thread->status_pending_p)
|
||||
&& lp->status_pending_p)
|
||||
(*count)++;
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -2273,6 +2274,7 @@ static int
|
|||
select_event_lwp_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct thread_info *thread = (struct thread_info *) entry;
|
||||
struct lwp_info *lp = get_thread_lwp (thread);
|
||||
int *selector = data;
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_assert (selector != NULL);
|
||||
|
@ -2280,7 +2282,7 @@ select_event_lwp_callback (struct inferior_list_entry *entry, void *data)
|
|||
/* Select only resumed LWPs that have an event pending. */
|
||||
if (thread->last_resume_kind != resume_stop
|
||||
&& thread->last_status.kind == TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE
|
||||
&& thread->status_pending_p)
|
||||
&& lp->status_pending_p)
|
||||
if ((*selector)-- == 0)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2324,6 +2326,7 @@ select_event_lwp (struct lwp_info **orig_lp)
|
|||
|
||||
/* First see how many events we have. */
|
||||
find_inferior (&all_threads, count_events_callback, &num_events);
|
||||
gdb_assert (num_events > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now randomly pick a LWP out of those that have had
|
||||
events. */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2841,6 +2841,7 @@ select_event_lwp (ptid_t filter, struct lwp_info **orig_lp, int *status)
|
|||
|
||||
/* First see how many events we have. */
|
||||
iterate_over_lwps (filter, count_events_callback, &num_events);
|
||||
gdb_assert (num_events > 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now randomly pick a LWP out of those that have had
|
||||
events. */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
|
|||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdb.threads/continue-pending-status.exp (saw_thread_2)
|
||||
(saw_thread_3): New globals.
|
||||
(top level): Increment them when an event for the corresponding
|
||||
thread is seen.
|
||||
(no thread starvation): New test.
|
||||
|
||||
2015-03-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* gdb.threads/continue-pending-status.c: New file.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ proc get_current_thread {} {
|
|||
|
||||
set attempts 20
|
||||
|
||||
# These track whether we saw events for both threads 2 and 3. If the
|
||||
# backend always returns the breakpoint hit for the same thread, then
|
||||
# it fails to make sure threads aren't starved, and we'll fail the
|
||||
# assert after the loop.
|
||||
set saw_thread_2 0
|
||||
set saw_thread_3 0
|
||||
|
||||
for {set i 0} {$i < $attempts} {incr i} {
|
||||
with_test_prefix "attempt $i" {
|
||||
gdb_test "b $srcfile:$break_line" \
|
||||
|
@ -71,8 +78,10 @@ for {set i 0} {$i < $attempts} {incr i} {
|
|||
# the resume and go straight to consuming the pending event.
|
||||
set thread [get_current_thread]
|
||||
if {$thread == 2} {
|
||||
incr saw_thread_2
|
||||
set thread 3
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
incr saw_thread_3
|
||||
set thread 2
|
||||
}
|
||||
gdb_test "thread $thread" \
|
||||
|
@ -108,3 +117,8 @@ for {set i 0} {$i < $attempts} {incr i} {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
verbose -log "saw_thread_2=$saw_thread_2"
|
||||
verbose -log "saw_thread_3=$saw_thread_3"
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_assert {$saw_thread_2 > 0 && $saw_thread_3 > 0} "no thread starvation"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue