gdb/riscv: Fix assertion in inferior call code
An assertion when setting up arguments for an inferior call checks the size of the argument against xlen. However, if xlen and flen are different sizes, and the argument is being placed into a floating pointer register then we should be comparing against flen not xlen. This issue shows up as an assertion failure when running on an rv32g target with a binary compiled using the rv32f abi and making an inferior call involving large floating point arguments, for example the test gdb.base/infcall-nested-structs.exp. gdb/ChangeLog: * riscv-tdep.c (riscv_is_fp_regno_p): New function. (riscv_register_reggroup_p): Use new function, remove unneeded parenthesis. (riscv_push_dummy_call): Extend assert to compare against xlen or flen based on register type.
This commit is contained in:
parent
42ecac1732
commit
8c49aa89ab
@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
|
||||
2018-07-10 Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* riscv-tdep.c (riscv_is_fp_regno_p): New function.
|
||||
(riscv_register_reggroup_p): Use new function, remove unneeded
|
||||
parenthesis.
|
||||
(riscv_push_dummy_call): Extend assert to compare against xlen or
|
||||
flen based on register type.
|
||||
|
||||
2018-07-10 Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* riscv-tdep.c (riscv_print_arg_location): Use TYPE_SAFE_NAME.
|
||||
|
@ -413,6 +413,15 @@ riscv_has_fp_abi (struct gdbarch *gdbarch)
|
||||
return (gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch)->abi.fields.float_abi != 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return true if REGNO is a floating pointer register. */
|
||||
|
||||
static bool
|
||||
riscv_is_fp_regno_p (int regno)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (regno >= RISCV_FIRST_FP_REGNUM
|
||||
&& regno <= RISCV_LAST_FP_REGNUM);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Implement the breakpoint_kind_from_pc gdbarch method. */
|
||||
|
||||
static int
|
||||
@ -787,10 +796,10 @@ riscv_register_reggroup_p (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int regnum,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (reggroup == float_reggroup)
|
||||
return ((regnum >= RISCV_FIRST_FP_REGNUM && regnum <= RISCV_LAST_FP_REGNUM)
|
||||
|| (regnum == RISCV_CSR_FCSR_REGNUM
|
||||
return (riscv_is_fp_regno_p (regnum)
|
||||
|| regnum == RISCV_CSR_FCSR_REGNUM
|
||||
|| regnum == RISCV_CSR_FFLAGS_REGNUM
|
||||
|| regnum == RISCV_CSR_FRM_REGNUM));
|
||||
|| regnum == RISCV_CSR_FRM_REGNUM);
|
||||
else if (reggroup == general_reggroup)
|
||||
return regnum < RISCV_FIRST_FP_REGNUM;
|
||||
else if (reggroup == restore_reggroup || reggroup == save_reggroup)
|
||||
@ -2154,7 +2163,9 @@ riscv_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
|
||||
{
|
||||
gdb_byte tmp [sizeof (ULONGEST)];
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_assert (second_arg_length <= call_info.xlen);
|
||||
gdb_assert ((riscv_is_fp_regno_p (info->argloc[1].loc_data.regno)
|
||||
&& second_arg_length <= call_info.flen)
|
||||
|| second_arg_length <= call_info.xlen);
|
||||
memset (tmp, 0, sizeof (tmp));
|
||||
memcpy (tmp, second_arg_data, second_arg_length);
|
||||
regcache->cooked_write (info->argloc[1].loc_data.regno, tmp);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user