OpenE2K/binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Fix random false FAILs on i386.

Browse Source 
* gdb.base/prelink.exp: Use `--no-exec-shield' for prelink.
This commit is contained in:
Jan Kratochvil 2008-03-24 15:16:12 +00:00
parent 31e5d73a44
commit 9df503519c
2 changed files with 15 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2008-03-24 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Fix random false FAILs on i386.
* gdb.base/prelink.exp: Use `--no-exec-shield' for prelink.
2008-03-23 Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
PR gdb/544

12
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/prelink.exp
View File

@ -47,7 +47,15 @@ if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${libsrcfile}" "${libfile}" executable [l
return -1
}
if {[catch "system \"prelink -qNR ${libfile}\""] != 0} {
# `--no-exec-shield' is for i386 where prelink in the exec-shield mode is
# forced to push all the libraries tight together to fit into the first two
# memory areas (either the ASCII Shield area or at least below the executable).
# In this case its -R option cannot be applied and we falsely FAIL here as if
# the system is already prelinked prelink has no choice how to randomize the
# single new unprelinked library address without wasting the first one/two
# memory areas. We do not care of the efficiency of loading such resulting
# exec-shield unfriendly prelinked library.
if {[catch "system \"prelink -qNR --no-exec-shield ${libfile}\""] != 0} {
# Maybe we don't have prelink.
return -1
}
@ -92,7 +100,7 @@ if {[catch "system \"prelink -uN ${libfile}\""] != 0} {
untested "${testfile}.so was not prelinked, maybe system libraries are not prelinked?"
return 0
}
catch "system \"prelink -qNR ${libfile}\""
catch "system \"prelink -qNR --no-exec-shield ${libfile}\""
# Start with a fresh gdb