OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

* TODO: Reword item regarding NO_STD_REGS.

This commit is contained in:
Jim Kingdon 1994-09-21 03:23:01 +00:00
parent 940bb1dc75
commit a36a812c48
2 changed files with 5 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
Tue Sep 20 11:34:27 1994 Jim Kingdon (kingdon@lioth.cygnus.com)
* TODO: Reword item regarding NO_STD_REGS.
* coffread.c (record_minimal_symbol, coff_read_enum_type,
coff_read_struct_type): Allocate on symbol_obstack, not directly
via malloc/savestring.

6
gdb/TODO
View File

@ -380,9 +380,9 @@ enum mask
If try to modify value in file with "set write off" should give
appropriate error not "cannot access memory at address 0x65e0".
What the hell is no_std_regs in tm-z8k.h???
This fixes the case where a target defines no standard reg names,
and the parsing of $pc gets confused when it should be an invalid expr.
Why do we allow a target to omit standard register names (NO_STD_REGS
in tm-z8k.h)? I thought the standard register names were supposed to
be just that, standard.
Make DEBUG_EXPRESSIONS a maintenance command, dependent on
MAINTENANCE_COMMANDS.