From a8bb57e724de7e566c890a2690f813e4b302cec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Kettenis Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:54:10 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] * x86-64-tdep.c: Remove duplicate comment. --- gdb/ChangeLog | 2 ++ gdb/x86-64-tdep.c | 7 ------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index e573e90b25..6ae5092765 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ 2003-10-06 Mark Kettenis + * x86-64-tdep.c: Remove duplicate comment. + * x86-64-tdep.c (x86_64_store_return_value): Don't use DEPRECATED_REGISTER_RAW_SIZE. Use symbolic names for register names for return values. This fixes a bug since we looked at %rbx diff --git a/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c b/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c index 165e208730..8290023df6 100644 --- a/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/x86-64-tdep.c @@ -1302,13 +1302,6 @@ x86_64_init_abi (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch *gdbarch) #define I387_ST0_REGNUM X86_64_ST0_REGNUM -/* The 64-bit FXSAVE format differs from the 32-bit format in the - sense that the instruction pointer and data pointer are simply - 64-bit offsets into the code segment and the data segment instead - of a selector offset pair. The functions below store the upper 32 - bits of these pointers (instead of just the 16-bits of the segment - selector). */ - /* The 64-bit FXSAVE format differs from the 32-bit format in the sense that the instruction pointer and data pointer are simply 64-bit offsets into the code segment and the data segment instead