OpenE2K/binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

2004-07-10 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>

Browse Source 
* symfile.c (generic_load): Comment typo.
        * stack.c (get_selected_block): Ditto.
        * regcache.c (regcache_cooked_read): Ditto.
        * monitor.c (monitor_debug): Ditto.
        * mips-tdep.c (mips_read_pc): Ditto.
        * i386-linux-nat.c (ps_get_thread_area): Ditto.
        * gdb_mbuild.sh: Ditto.
        * gdbarch.sh: Ditto.
        * gdbarch.h: Ditto.
This commit is contained in:
Michael Snyder 2004-07-10 01:17:53 +00:00
parent 109d3db382
commit b2fa5097bf
10 changed files with 21 additions and 9 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
2004-07-10 Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
* symfile.c (generic_load): Comment typo.
* stack.c (get_selected_block): Ditto.
* regcache.c (regcache_cooked_read): Ditto.
* monitor.c (monitor_debug): Ditto.
* mips-tdep.c (mips_read_pc): Ditto.
* i386-linux-nat.c (ps_get_thread_area): Ditto.
* gdb_mbuild.sh: Ditto.
* gdbarch.sh: Ditto.
* gdbarch.h: Ditto.
2004-07-09 Paul N. Hilfinger <Hilfinger@gnat.com>
Remove ARI problems:

2
gdb/gdb_mbuild.sh
View File

@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ do
trap "exit 1" 1 2 15
dir=${builddir}/${target}
# Should a scratch rebuild be forced, for perhaphs the entire
# Should a scratch rebuild be forced, for perhaps the entire
# build be skipped?
if ${force}

2
gdb/gdbarch.h
View File

@ -1749,7 +1749,7 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_software_single_step (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_s
#endif
/* FIXME: cagney/2003-08-28: Need to find a better way of selecting the
disassembler. Perhaphs objdump can handle it? */
disassembler. Perhaps objdump can handle it? */
typedef int (gdbarch_print_insn_ftype) (bfd_vma vma, struct disassemble_info *info);
extern int gdbarch_print_insn (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, bfd_vma vma, struct disassemble_info *info);

2
gdb/gdbarch.sh
View File

@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ f:=:CORE_ADDR:smash_text_address:CORE_ADDR addr:addr:::core_addr_identity::0
# single step. If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
F:=:void:software_single_step:enum target_signal sig, int insert_breakpoints_p:sig, insert_breakpoints_p
# FIXME: cagney/2003-08-28: Need to find a better way of selecting the
# disassembler. Perhaphs objdump can handle it?
# disassembler. Perhaps objdump can handle it?
f:TARGET_PRINT_INSN:int:print_insn:bfd_vma vma, struct disassemble_info *info:vma, info:::0:
f:=:CORE_ADDR:skip_trampoline_code:CORE_ADDR pc:pc:::generic_skip_trampoline_code::0

2
gdb/i386-linux-nat.c
View File

@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ ps_get_thread_area (const struct ps_prochandle *ph,
Is this function needed? I'm guessing that the `base' is the
address of a a descriptor that libthread_db uses to find the
thread local address base that GDB needs. Perhaphs that
thread local address base that GDB needs. Perhaps that
descriptor is defined by the ABI. Anyway, given that
libthread_db calls this function without prompting (gdb
requesting tls base) I guess it needs info in there anyway. */

2
gdb/mips-tdep.c
View File

@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ pc_is_mips16 (bfd_vma memaddr)
return 0;
}
/* MIPS believes that the PC has a sign extended value. Perhaphs the
/* MIPS believes that the PC has a sign extended value. Perhaps the
all registers should be sign extended for simplicity? */
static CORE_ADDR

2
gdb/monitor.c
View File

@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static void monitor_debug (const char *fmt, ...) ATTR_FORMAT(printf, 1, 2);
static int monitor_debug_p = 0;
/* NOTE: This file alternates between monitor_debug_p and remote_debug
when determining if debug information is printed. Perhaphs this
when determining if debug information is printed. Perhaps this
could be simplified. */
static void

2
gdb/regcache.c
View File

@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ regcache_cooked_read (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum, void *buf)
else if (regcache->readonly_p
&& regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers
&& regcache->register_valid_p[regnum])
/* Read-only register cache, perhaphs the cooked value was cached? */
/* Read-only register cache, perhaps the cooked value was cached? */
memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
else

2
gdb/stack.c
View File

@ -1578,7 +1578,7 @@ get_selected_block (CORE_ADDR *addr_in_block)
return 0;
/* NOTE: cagney/2002-11-28: Why go to all this effort to not create
a selected/current frame? Perhaphs this function is called,
a selected/current frame? Perhaps this function is called,
indirectly, by WFI in "infrun.c" where avoiding the creation of
an inner most frame is very important (it slows down single
step). I suspect, though that this was true in the deep dark

2
gdb/symfile.c
View File

@ -1532,7 +1532,7 @@ generic_load (char *args, int from_tty)
to a comment from remote-mips.c (where a call to symbol_file_add
was commented out), making the call confuses GDB if more than one
file is loaded in. Some targets do (e.g., remote-vx.c) but
others don't (or didn't - perhaphs they have all been deleted). */
others don't (or didn't - perhaps they have all been deleted). */
print_transfer_performance (gdb_stdout, cbdata.data_count,
cbdata.write_count, end_time - start_time);