OpenE2K/binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

* gdb.base/signals.exp: Make backtrace tests more specific.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Jacobowitz 2003-04-28 00:50:30 +00:00
parent a81a272ddb
commit bea7185483
2 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2003-04-27 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* gdb.base/signals.exp: Make backtrace tests more specific.
2003-04-23 David Carlton <carlton@bactrian.org>
* gdb.c++/maint.exp (test_first_component): Add tests for

6
gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/signals.exp
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# Copyright 1997, 1998, 1999, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ proc signal_tests_1 {} {
# #2, #3, or higher. At some point this should be fixed (but
# it quite possibly would introduce new FAILs on some systems).
setup_xfail "i*86-*-bsdi2.0"
gdb_test "backtrace 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" \
gdb_test "backtrace 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*signal handler.*#2.* main .*" \
"backtrace in signals_tests_1"
gdb_test "break func1" "Breakpoint \[0-9\]+ .*"
@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ The program being debugged stopped while in a function called from GDB.*" \
# But we should be able to backtrace...
# On alpha-*-osf2.0 this test works when run manually but sometime fails when
# run under dejagnu, making it very hard to debug the problem. Weird...
gdb_test "bt 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*#2.*main.*" "bt in signals.exp"
gdb_test "bt 10" "#0.*handler.*#1.*signal handler.*#2.* main .*" "bt in signals.exp"
# ...and continue...
gdb_test "continue" "Continuing\\." "continue in signals.exp"
# ...and then count should have been incremented