OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Add comment about code that is actually d10v specific instead of d30v

This commit is contained in:
Michael Meissner 1997-11-13 15:11:56 +00:00
parent 5d62f957a8
commit c2f766136e
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gdb/d30v-tdep.c
View File

@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ d30v_skip_prologue (pc)
CORE_ADDR func_addr, func_end;
struct symtab_and_line sal;
/* XXX -- these need to be updated, the instruction patterns are actually
for the d10v, not the d30v. */
/* If we have line debugging information, then the end of the */
/* prologue should the first assembly instruction of the first source line */
if (find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_addr, &func_end))
@ -228,6 +230,8 @@ prologue_find_regs (op, fsr, addr)
{
int n;
/* XXX -- these need to be updated, the instruction patterns are actually
for the d10v, not the d30v. */
/* st rn, @-sp */
if ((op & 0x7E1F) == 0x6C1F)
{
@ -293,6 +297,8 @@ prologue_find_regs (op, fsr, addr)
This includes special registers such as pc and fp saved in special
ways in the stack frame. sp is even more special: the address we
return for it IS the sp for the next frame. */
/* XXX -- these need to be updated, the instruction patterns are actually
for the d10v, not the d30v. */
void
d30v_frame_find_saved_regs (fi, fsr)
struct frame_info *fi;