OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Call target_mourn_inferior 

instead of kill_target.
This commit is contained in:
Nicholas Duffek 2000-04-05 02:26:37 +00:00
parent dd27201edf
commit c7e79b4bee
2 changed files with 11 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
2000-04-04 Nick Duffek <nsd@cygnus.com>
* infrun.c (handle_inferior_event): Call target_mourn_inferior
instead of kill_target.
2000-04-04 Daniel Berlin <dan@cgsoftware.com>
* TODO: Make note of various C++ things i have planned for 5.1.

12
gdb/infrun.c
View File

@ -1555,12 +1555,12 @@ handle_inferior_event (struct execution_control_state *ecs)
stop_signal = ecs->ws.value.sig;
target_terminal_ours (); /* Must do this before mourn anyway */
/* This looks pretty bogus to me. Doesn't TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED
mean it is already dead? This has been here since GDB 2.8, so
perhaps it means rms didn't understand unix waitstatuses?
For the moment I'm just kludging around this in remote.c
rather than trying to change it here --kingdon, 5 Dec 1994. */
target_kill (); /* kill mourns as well */
/* Note: By definition of TARGET_WAITKIND_SIGNALLED, we shouldn't
reach here unless the inferior is dead. However, for years
target_kill() was called here, which hints that fatal signals aren't
really fatal on some systems. If that's true, then some changes
may be needed. */
target_mourn_inferior ();
print_stop_reason (SIGNAL_EXITED, stop_signal);
singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p = 0; /*SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P */