[gdb/testsuite] Add gcc/94469 xfails to gdb.ada/call_pn.exp
When running test-case gdb.ada/call_pn.exp with target board unix/-flto/-O0/-flto-partition=none/-ffat-lto-objects, we run into: ... (gdb) print last_node_id^M Multiple matches for last_node_id^M [0] cancel^M [1] pck.last_node_id at gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/call_pn/pck.adb:17^M [2] pck.last_node_id at gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/call_pn/foo.adb:17^M > FAIL: gdb.ada/call_pn.exp: print last_node_id after calling pn (timeout) ... This failure is due to a gcc bug that declares two instead of one symbols, filed as PR gcc/94469. Add an xfail at this test. Also add a similar xfail at an earlier test, that only triggers with -readnow. Stabilize test results by making sure the earlier xfail is always triggered, using "maint expand-symtabs". Tested on x86_64-linux. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-04-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> PR testsuite/25760 * gdb.ada/call_pn.exp: Call "maint expand-symtabs". Add xfails.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cc9411f8dc
commit
e21d048f8a
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2020-04-08 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
|
||||
|
||||
PR testsuite/25760
|
||||
* gdb.ada/call_pn.exp: Call "maint expand-symtabs". Add xfails.
|
||||
|
||||
2020-04-07 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
|
||||
|
||||
PR symtab/25796
|
||||
|
@ -29,8 +29,41 @@ if ![runto "foo.adb:$bp_location" ] then {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# The xfail mentioned below triggers for the "after" print, but may not
|
||||
# trigger for the "before" print, though it will for -readnow. This is
|
||||
# related to PR25764 - "LOC_UNRESOLVED symbol missing from partial symtab".
|
||||
# Stabilize test results by ensuring that the xfail triggers for the "before"
|
||||
# print.
|
||||
gdb_test_no_output "maint expand-symtabs"
|
||||
|
||||
# The xfail is for PR gcc/94469, which occurs with target board
|
||||
# unix/-flto/-O0/-flto-partition=none/-ffat-lto-objects and gcc-8 and later.
|
||||
# Note: We don't check for the filename in xfail_re because it might be
|
||||
# wrong, filed as gdb PR25771.
|
||||
set xfail_re \
|
||||
[multi_line \
|
||||
"Multiple matches for last_node_id" \
|
||||
"\\\[0\\\] cancel" \
|
||||
"\\\[1\\\] pck\.last_node_id at .*.adb:17" \
|
||||
"\\\[2\\\] pck\.last_node_id at .*.adb:17" \
|
||||
"> $"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Make sure that last_node_id is set to zero...
|
||||
gdb_test "print last_node_id" "= 0" "print last_node_id before calling pn"
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "print last_node_id" "print last_node_id before calling pn" {
|
||||
-re $xfail_re {
|
||||
xfail $gdb_test_name
|
||||
# One of the choices will print the correct value, the other one
|
||||
# <optimized out>. Since we don't known which one to choose to get
|
||||
# the correct value, cancel.
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "0" "cancel after xfail 1" {
|
||||
-re -wrap "cancelled" {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
-re -wrap "= 0" {
|
||||
pass $gdb_test_name
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
# Now, call procedure Pn, which should set Last_Node_Id to the value
|
||||
# of the parameter used in the function call. Verify that we can print
|
||||
@ -38,5 +71,16 @@ gdb_test "print last_node_id" "= 0" "print last_node_id before calling pn"
|
||||
gdb_test "print pn (4321)" "= 4321"
|
||||
|
||||
# Make sure that last_node_id now has the correct value...
|
||||
gdb_test "print last_node_id" "= 4321" "print last_node_id after calling pn"
|
||||
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "print last_node_id" "print last_node_id after calling pn" {
|
||||
-re $xfail_re {
|
||||
xfail $gdb_test_name
|
||||
# Cancel
|
||||
gdb_test_multiple "0" "cancel after xfail 2" {
|
||||
-re -wrap "cancelled" {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
-re -wrap "= 4321" {
|
||||
pass $gdb_test_name
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user