x86: fold (supposed to be) identical code
The Q and L suffix exclusion checks in match_template() ought to be (kept) in sync as far as their FPU and SIMD aspects go. This was already violated by only the Q one checking for active broadcast. Convert the code such that there'll be only one instance of the logic, the more that subsequently the logic is liable to need further refinement / extension. (The alternative would be to drop all SIMD-ness from the L part, but it is in principle possible to enable all sorts of SIMD support with just a pre-386 CPU, via suitable .arch directives.)
This commit is contained in:
parent
672a349b01
commit
e365e234ab
@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
|
||||
2020-03-06 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/tc-i386.c (match_template): Fold duplicate code in
|
||||
logic rejecting certain suffixes in certain modes. Drop
|
||||
pointless "else".
|
||||
|
||||
2020-03-06 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/tc-i386.c (process_suffix): Exlucde !vexw insns
|
||||
|
@ -5874,43 +5874,30 @@ match_template (char mnem_suffix)
|
||||
for (j = 0; j < MAX_OPERANDS; j++)
|
||||
operand_types[j] = t->operand_types[j];
|
||||
|
||||
/* In general, don't allow 64-bit operands in 32-bit mode. */
|
||||
if (i.suffix == QWORD_MNEM_SUFFIX
|
||||
&& flag_code != CODE_64BIT
|
||||
/* In general, don't allow
|
||||
- 64-bit operands outside of 64-bit mode,
|
||||
- 32-bit operands on pre-386. */
|
||||
if (((i.suffix == QWORD_MNEM_SUFFIX
|
||||
&& flag_code != CODE_64BIT
|
||||
&& (t->base_opcode != 0x0fc7
|
||||
|| t->extension_opcode != 1 /* cmpxchg8b */))
|
||||
|| (i.suffix == LONG_MNEM_SUFFIX
|
||||
&& !cpu_arch_flags.bitfield.cpui386))
|
||||
&& (intel_syntax
|
||||
? (t->opcode_modifier.mnemonicsize != IGNORESIZE
|
||||
&& !t->opcode_modifier.broadcast
|
||||
&& !t->opcode_modifier.broadcast
|
||||
&& !intel_float_operand (t->name))
|
||||
: intel_float_operand (t->name) != 2)
|
||||
&& ((operand_types[0].bitfield.class != RegMMX
|
||||
&& operand_types[0].bitfield.class != RegSIMD)
|
||||
|| (operand_types[t->operands > 1].bitfield.class != RegMMX
|
||||
&& operand_types[t->operands > 1].bitfield.class != RegSIMD))
|
||||
&& (t->base_opcode != 0x0fc7
|
||||
|| t->extension_opcode != 1 /* cmpxchg8b */))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* In general, don't allow 32-bit operands on pre-386. */
|
||||
else if (i.suffix == LONG_MNEM_SUFFIX
|
||||
&& !cpu_arch_flags.bitfield.cpui386
|
||||
&& (intel_syntax
|
||||
? (t->opcode_modifier.mnemonicsize != IGNORESIZE
|
||||
&& !intel_float_operand (t->name))
|
||||
: intel_float_operand (t->name) != 2)
|
||||
&& ((operand_types[0].bitfield.class != RegMMX
|
||||
&& operand_types[0].bitfield.class != RegSIMD)
|
||||
|| (operand_types[t->operands > 1].bitfield.class != RegMMX
|
||||
&& operand_types[t->operands > 1].bitfield.class
|
||||
!= RegSIMD)))
|
||||
&& operand_types[t->operands > 1].bitfield.class != RegSIMD)))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do not verify operands when there are none. */
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!t->operands)
|
||||
/* We've found a match; break out of loop. */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!t->operands)
|
||||
/* We've found a match; break out of loop. */
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!t->opcode_modifier.jump
|
||||
|| t->opcode_modifier.jump == JUMP_ABSOLUTE)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user