OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Fix comment in ada-typeprint.c 

A comment in ada-typeprint.c mentions the Unchecked_Variant pragma.
However, this does not exist, and the comment should actually mention
Unchecked_Union.

gdb/ChangeLog
2020-03-11  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Fix comment.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Tromey 2020-03-11 08:29:51 -06:00
parent 976862ed56
commit e7a82140af
2 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2020-03-11 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Fix comment.
2020-03-11 Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
* buildsyms.c (buildsym_compunit::record_line): Avoid accessing

2
gdb/ada-typeprint.c
View File

@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ print_array_type (struct type *type, struct ui_file *stream, int show,
values. Return non-zero if the field is an encoding of
discriminant values, as in a standard variant record, and 0 if the
field is not so encoded (as happens with single-component variants
in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Variant). */
in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Union). */
static int
print_choices (struct type *type, int field_num, struct ui_file *stream,