OpenE2K
/
binutils-gdb
12
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Call debug_exit in linux_wait_1 

When I read the GDBserver debug message, I find the "entering" of
linux_wait_1 doesn't match the "existing" of linux_wait_1.  Looks
we don't call debug_exit somewhere in linux_wait_1 on return.

gdb/gdbserver:

2016-09-26  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* linux-low.c (linux_wait_1): Call debug_exit.
This commit is contained in:
Yao Qi 2016-09-26 04:01:19 +01:00
parent b9897522a5
commit edeeb60243
2 changed files with 17 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2016-09-26 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* linux-low.c (linux_wait_1): Call debug_exit.
2016-09-23 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* Makefile.in (SFILES): Add common/new-op.c.

13
gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.c
View File

@ -3452,6 +3452,8 @@ linux_wait_1 (ptid_t ptid,
linux_resume_one_lwp (event_child, 0, 0, NULL);
if (debug_threads)
debug_exit ();
return ignore_event (ourstatus);
}
}
@ -3547,6 +3549,9 @@ linux_wait_1 (ptid_t ptid,
linux_resume_one_lwp (event_child, event_child->stepping,
0, NULL);
if (debug_threads)
debug_exit ();
return ignore_event (ourstatus);
}
@ -3602,6 +3607,10 @@ linux_wait_1 (ptid_t ptid,
linux_resume_one_lwp (event_child, event_child->stepping,
WSTOPSIG (w), info_p);
}
if (debug_threads)
debug_exit ();
return ignore_event (ourstatus);
}
@ -3682,6 +3691,10 @@ linux_wait_1 (ptid_t ptid,
unsuspend_all_lwps (event_child);
proceed_all_lwps ();
if (debug_threads)
debug_exit ();
return ignore_event (ourstatus);
}