* gdb.texinfo (Packets): Clarify lack of restrictions on behavior

of stub when processing an 'm' packet.
This commit is contained in:
Jim Blandy 2005-11-15 19:58:30 +00:00
parent 8ffe25303d
commit fb031cdf9e
2 changed files with 11 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
2005-11-15 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Packets): Clarify lack of restrictions on behavior
of stub when processing an 'm' packet.
* gdb.texinfo (Packets): Mention that packets beginning with
letters are reserved once, at the top, instead of actually listing
them all and saying "reserved".

View File

@ -22325,18 +22325,19 @@ thread?)}.
@cindex @code{m} packet
Read @var{length} bytes of memory starting at address @var{addr}.
Neither @value{GDBN} nor the stub assume that sized memory transfers are
assumed using word aligned accesses. FIXME: @emph{A word aligned memory
transfer mechanism is needed.}
Note that @var{addr} may not be aligned to any particular boundary.
The stub need not use any particular size or alignment when gathering
data from memory for the response; even if @var{addr} is word-aligned
and @var{length} is a multiple of the word size, the stub is free to
use byte accesses, or not. For this reason, this packet may not be
suitable for accessing memory-mapped I/O devices.
Reply:
@table @samp
@item @var{XX@dots{}}
@var{XX@dots{}} is mem contents. Can be fewer bytes than requested if able
to read only part of the data. Neither @value{GDBN} nor the stub assume
that sized memory transfers are assumed using word aligned
accesses. FIXME: @emph{A word aligned memory transfer mechanism is
needed.}
to read only part of the data.
@item E@var{NN}
@var{NN} is errno
@end table