This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
BASEDIR was added by https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-10/msg00587.html
in order to handle the different directory layout in serial testing
and parallel testing. BASEDIR is "gdb.base" in serial testing and is
"outputs/gdb.base/TESTNAME" in parallel testing. However, it doesn't
work if the GDBserver is in remote target, like this,
$ make check RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=remote-gdbserver-on-localhost foll-vfork.exp foll-exec.exp'
FAIL: gdb.base/foll-exec.exp: continue to first exec catchpoint (the program exited)
FAIL: gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp: exec: vfork and exec child follow, to main bp: continue to bp (the program exited)
FAIL: gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp: exec: vfork child follow, finish after tcatch vfork: finish (the program exited)
FAIL: gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp: exec: vfork relations in info inferiors: continue to bp (the program exited)
these tests fail because the executable can't be found. With target
board native-gdbserver, the program is spawned this way,
spawn ../gdbserver/gdbserver --once :2347 /scratch/yao/gdb/build-git/x86_64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-vfork
so BASEDIR is correct. However, with target board
remote-gdbserver-on-localhost, the program is spawned
spawn /usr/bin/ssh -l yao localhost /scratch/yao/gdb/build-git/x86_64/gdb/testsuite/../gdbserver/gdbserver --once :2346 /scratch/yao/gdb/build-git/x86_64/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/foll-vfork
so BASEDIR (either "gdb.base" or "outputs/gdb.base/TESTNAME") makes no
sense.
I had a fix that pass absolute directory to BASEDIR, but it assumes
that directory structure is the same on build and target, and it
doesn't work in remote host case. The current fix in this patch is
to get the directory from argv[0]. In any case, the program to be
exec'ed is at the same directory with the main program.
Note that these tests do "next N" to let program stop at the desired
line, but it is fragile, because GDB for different targets may skip
function prologue slightly differently, so I replace some of them by
"tbreak on LINE NUMBER and continue".
gdb/testsuite:
2016-02-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdb.base/foll-exec-mode.c: Include limits.h.
(main): Add parameters argc and argv. Get directory from
argv[0].
* gdb.base/foll-exec-mode.exp: Don't pass -DBASEDIR in
compilation.
* gdb.base/foll-exec.c: Include limits.h.
(main): Add parameters argc and argv.
Get directory from argv[0].
* gdb.base/foll-exec.exp: Don't pass -DBASEDIR in compilation.
Adjust tests on the number of lines as source code changed.
* gdb.base/foll-vfork-exit.c: Include limits.h.
(main): Add one line of statement before vfork.
* gdb.base/foll-vfork.c: Include limits.h and string.h.
(main): Add parameters argc and argv. Get directory from
argv[0].
* gdb.base/foll-vfork.exp: Don't pass -DBASEDIR in compilation.
(setup_gdb): Set tbreak to skip some source lines.
* gdb.multi/bkpt-multi-exec.c: Include limits.h.
(main): Add parameters argc and argv. Get directory from
argv[0].
* gdb.multi/bkpt-multi-exec.exp: Don't pass -DBASEDIR in
compilation.
* gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c: Include limits.h and string.h.
(main): Add parameters argc and argv. Get directory from
argv[0].
* gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp: Don't pass -DBASEDIR in
compilation.
This patch implements a new GDB test for follow-exec-mode. Although
there is a GDB test for debugging across an exec, there is no test for
follow-exec-mode. This test is derived from gdb.base/foll-exec.exp,
and re-uses execd-prog.c as the program to exec.
The following behavior is tested:
follow-exec-mode == "same"
- 'next' over the exec, check for one inferior
- 'continue' past the exec to a breakpoint, check for one inferior
- after the exec, use a 'run' command to run the current binary
follow-exec-mode == "new"
- 'next' over the exec, check for two inferiors
- 'continue' past the exec to a breakpoint, check for two inferiors
- after the exec, use a 'run' command to run the current binary
- after the exec, use the 'inferior' command to switch inferiors,
then use a 'run' command to run the current binary
Note that single-step breakpoints do not survive across an exec.
There has to be a breakpoint in the execed program in order for
it to stop right after the exec.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/foll-exec-2.c: New test program.
* gdb.base/foll-exec-2.exp: New test.
Joel Brobecker
Yao Qi
Don Breazeal