gas * config/tc-rl78.h (TC_LINKRELAX_FIXUP): Define.
(TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME): Define.
(DWARF2_USE_FIXED_ADVANCE_PC): Define.
* gas/lns/lns.exp: Add RL78 to list of targets using
DW_LNS_fixed_advance_pc.
bfd * elf32-rl78.c (RL78_OP_REL): New macro.
(rl78_elf_howto_table): Use it for complex relocs.
(get_symbol_value): Handle the cases when the info or status
arguments are NULL.
(get_romstart): Cache the status returned by get_symbol_value.
(get_ramstart): Likewise.
(RL78_STACK_PUSH): Generate an error message if the stack
overflows.
(RL78_STACK_POP): Likewise for underflows.
(rl78_compute_complex_reloc): New function. Contains the basic
processing code for all RL78 complex relocs.
(rl78_special_reloc): New function. Provides special reloc
handling for complex relocs.
(rl78_elf_relocate_section): Use rl78_compute_complex_reloc.
(rl78_offset_for_reloc): Likewise.
binutils* readelf.c (target_specific_reloc_handling): Add code to handle
RL78 complex relocs.
Reinstate test message and replace hardcoded test command with a variable.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-14 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp (test): Reinstate correct test message.
GDB has five places where it pretends to stat for bfd_openr_iovec.
Four of these only set the incoming buffer's st_size, leaving the
other fields unchanged, which is to say very likely populated with
random values from the stack. remote_bfd_iovec_stat was fixed in
0a93529c56714b1da3d7106d3e0300764f8bb81c; this commit fixes the
other four.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* jit.c (mem_bfd_iovec_stat): Zero supplied buffer.
* minidebug.c (lzma_stat): Likewise.
* solib-spu.c (spu_bfd_iovec_stat): Likewise.
* spu-linux-nat.c (spu_bfd_iovec_stat): Likewise.
Address of protected data defined in the shared library may be external,
i.e., due to copy relocation. By default, linker backend checks if
relocations against protected data symbols are valid for building shared
library and issues an error if relocation isn't allowed. The new option
override linker backend default. When -z noextern-protected-data is used,
updates on protected data symbols by another module won't be visibile
to the resulting shared library. This option is specific to ELF/i386
and ELF/x86-64.
bfd/
PR ld/pr17709
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_adjust_dynamic_copy): Check
info->extern_protected_data when warning copy relocs against
protected symbols.
(_bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p): Check info->extern_protected_data
when checking protected non-function symbols.
include/
PR ld/pr17709
* bfdlink.h (bfd_link_info): Add extern_protected_data.
ld/
PR ld/pr17709
* ld.texinfo: Document "-z noextern-protected-data".
* ldmain.c (main): Initialize link_info.extern_protected_data
to -1.
* lexsup.c (elf_shlib_list_options): Add
"-z [no]extern-protected-data".
* emulparams/elf32_x86_64.sh: Source extern_protected_data.sh.
* emulparams/elf_i386.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_i386_be.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_i386_chaos.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_i386_ldso.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_i386_vxworks.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_k1om.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_l1om.sh: Likewise.
* emulparams/elf_x86_64.sh: Source extern_protected_data.sh.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS): Renamed to ...
(PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS_BNDPLT): This.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASE_Z): Renamed to ...
(PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASE_Z_BNDPLT): This.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS): Append $PARSE_AND_LIST_OPTIONS_BNDPLT.
(PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASE_Z): Append
$PARSE_AND_LIST_ARGS_CASE_Z_BNDPLT.
* emulparams/extern_protected_data.sh: New file.
ld/testsuite/
PR ld/pr17709
* ld-i386/i386.exp: Run protected6b.
* ld-i386/protected6b.d: New file.
* ld-x86-64/protected6b.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run protected6b.
Recognize NT_X86_XSTATE notes in FreeBSD process cores. Recent
FreeBSD versions include a note containing the XSAVE state for each
thread in the process when XSAVE is in use. The note stores a copy of
the current XSAVE mask in a reserved section of the machine-defined
XSAVE state at the same offset as Linux's NT_X86_XSTATE note.
For native processes, use the PT_GETXSTATE_INFO ptrace request to
determine if XSAVE is enabled, and if so the active XSAVE state mask
(that is, the value of %xcr0 for the target process) as well as the
size of XSAVE state area. Use the PT_GETXSTATE and PT_SETXSTATE requests
to fetch and store the XSAVE state, respectively, in the BSD x86
native targets.
In addition, the FreeBSD amd64 and i386 native targets now include
"read_description" target methods to determine the correct x86 target
description for the current XSAVE mask. On FreeBSD amd64 this also
properly returns an i386 target description for 32-bit binaries which
allows the 64-bit GDB to run 32-bit binaries.
Note that the ptrace changes are in the BSD native targets, not the
FreeBSD-specific native targets since that is where the other ptrace
register accesses occur. Of the other BSDs, NetBSD and DragonFly use
XSAVE in the kernel but do not currently export the extended state via
ptrace(2). OpenBSD does not currently support XSAVE.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elf.c (elfcore_grok_note): Recognize NT_X86_XSTATE on
FreeBSD.
(elfcore_write_xstatereg): Use correct note name on FreeBSD.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* amd64-tdep.c (amd64_target_description): New function.
* amd64-tdep.h: Export amd64_target_description and tdesc_amd64.
* amd64bsd-nat.c [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: New variable amd64bsd_xsave_len.
(amd64bsd_fetch_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Handle
x86 extended save area.
(amd64bsd_store_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Likewise.
* amd64bsd-nat.h: Export amd64bsd_xsave_len.
* amd64fbsd-nat.c (amd64fbsd_read_description): New function.
(_initialize_amd64fbsd_nat): Set "to_read_description" to
"amd64fbsd_read_description".
* amd64fbsd-tdep.c (amd64fbsd_core_read_description): New function.
(amd64fbsd_supply_xstateregset): New function.
(amd64fbsd_collect_xstateregset): New function.
Add "amd64fbsd_xstateregset".
(amd64fbsd_iterate_over_regset_sections): New function.
(amd64fbsd_init_abi): Set "xsave_xcr0_offset" to
"I386_FBSD_XSAVE_XCR0_OFFSET".
Add "iterate_over_regset_sections" gdbarch method.
Add "core_read_description" gdbarch method.
* i386-tdep.c (i386_target_description): New function.
* i386-tdep.h: Export i386_target_description and tdesc_i386.
* i386bsd-nat.c [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: New variable i386bsd_xsave_len.
(i386bsd_fetch_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Handle
x86 extended save area.
(i386bsd_store_inferior_registers) [PT_GETXSTATE_INFO]: Likewise.
* i386bsd-nat.h: Export i386bsd_xsave_len.
* i386fbsd-nat.c (i386fbsd_read_description): New function.
(_initialize_i386fbsd_nat): Set "to_read_description" to
"i386fbsd_read_description".
* i386fbsd-tdep.c (i386fbsd_core_read_xcr0): New function.
(i386fbsd_core_read_description): New function.
(i386fbsd_supply_xstateregset): New function.
(i386fbsd_collect_xstateregset): New function.
Add "i386fbsd_xstateregset".
(i386fbsd_iterate_over_regset_sections): New function.
(i386fbsd4_init_abi): Set "xsave_xcr0_offset" to
"I386_FBSD_XSAVE_XCR0_OFFSET".
Add "iterate_over_regset_sections" gdbarch method.
Add "core_read_description" gdbarch method.
* i386fbsd-tdep.h: New file.
This testcase does not work as expected in QEMU (aarch64 QEMU in my case). It
fails when trying to manually write the breakpoint instruction to a certain
PC address.
(gdb) p /x addr_bp[0] = buffer[0]^M
Cannot access memory at address 0x400834^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[0] = buffer[0]
p /x addr_bp[1] = buffer[1]^M
Cannot access memory at address 0x400835^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[1] = buffer[1]
p /x addr_bp[2] = buffer[2]^M
Cannot access memory at address 0x400836^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[2] = buffer[2]
p /x addr_bp[3] = buffer[3]^M
Cannot access memory at address 0x400837^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0: setup: p /x addr_bp[3] = buffer[3]
The following patch prevents a number of failures by detecting this and bailing out in case the target has such a restriction. Writing to .text from within the program isn't any better. It just leads to a SIGSEGV.
Before the patch:
=== gdb Summary ===
After the patch:
=== gdb Summary ===
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-13 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp (test): Handle the case of being unable
to write to the .text section.
This testcase seems to assume the target is running Linux, so bare metal,
simulators and other debugging stubs running different OS' will have a
hard time executing some of the commands the testcase issues.
Even restricting the testcase to Linux systems (which the patch below does),
there are still problems with, say, QEMU not providing PID information when
"info inferior" is issued. As a consequence, the subsequent tests will either
fail or will not make much sense.
The attached patch checks if PID information is available. If not, it just
bails out and avoids running into a number of failures.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-13 Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
* gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp: Restrict test to Linux systems only.
Handle the case of targets that do not provide PID information.
I see the error when I run gdb-sigterm.exp with native-gdbserver
on x86_64-linux.
infrun: prepare_to_wait^M
Cannot execute this command while the target is running.^M
Use the "interrupt" command to stop the target^M
and then try again.^M
gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #0: got eof
gdb.base/gdb-sigterm.exp: expect eof #0: stepped 12 times
ERROR OCCURED: : spawn id exp8 not open
while executing
"expect {
-i exp8 -timeout 10
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
exp_continue
}
-i "$server_spawn_id" eof {
wait -i $expect_out(spawn_id)
unse..."
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
In gdb-sigterm.exp, SIGTERM is sent to GDB and it exits. However,
Dejagnu or tcl doesn't know this.
This patch is to catch the exception, but error messages are still
shown in the console and gdb.log. In order to avoid this, we also
replace gdb_expect with expect.
gdb/testsuite:
2015-04-13 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* lib/gdbserver-support.exp (gdb_exit): Catch exception
and use expect instead of gdb_expect.
When ELF linker backend searchs the symbol table of an archive element,
it should skip the object which has been claimed by plugin.
PR ld/18250
* elflink.c (elf_link_is_defined_archive_symbol): Return FALSE
if the object has been claimed by plugin.
This commit renames the global array variable "addr" to an unique name
"coredump_var_addr" in the test gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp. This is
needed because global arrays can have name conflicts between tests.
For example, this specific test was conflicting with dmsym.exp,
causing errors like:
ERROR: tcl error sourcing ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp.
ERROR: can't set "addr": variable is array
while executing
"set addr "0x\[0-9a-zA-Z\]+""
(file "../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp" line 45)
invoked from within
"source ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp"
("uplevel" body line 1)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 source ../../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/dmsym.exp"
invoked from within
"catch "uplevel #0 source $test_file_name""
This problem was reported by Yao Qi at:
<https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-04/msg00373.html>
Message-Id: <1428666671-12926-1-git-send-email-qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-13 Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/coredump-filter.exp: Rename variable "addr" to
"coredump_var_addr" to avoid naming conflict with other testcases.
The old run frontend had a --version option, but the new common
sim-options file does not. Restore support for that so we can
get version info out of `run` when using the new frontend.
With sim-hrw.o being built & linked in the common list, some people are
getting linking errors now for these targets. Move the main objects that
provide these functions before the common list to avoid that.
There is no need to check and initialize pagesize_m1 in cache_bmmap.
* cache.c (cache_bmmap): Move pagesize_m1 ... to
(pagesize_m1): Here.
(bfd_cache_init): Initialize pagesize_m1.
Pedro Alves:
The commands that enables aren't even documented in the manual.
Judging from that, I assume that only wdb users would ever really
be using the --xdb switch.
I think it's time to drop "support" for the --xdb switch too. I
looked through the commands that that exposes, the only that looked
potentially interesting was "go", but then it's just an alias
for "tbreak+jump", which can easily be done with "define go...end".
I'd rather free up the "go" name for something potentially
more interesting (either run control, or maybe even unrelated,
e.g., for golang).
gdb/ChangeLog
2015-04-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* NEWS (Changes since GDB 7.9): Add removed -xdb.
* breakpoint.c (command_line_is_silent): Remove xdb_commands
conditional.
(_initialize_breakpoint): Remove xdb_commands for bc, ab, sb, db, ba
and lb.
* cli/cli-cmds.c (_initialize_cli_cmds): Remove xdb_commands for v and
va.
* cli/cli-decode.c (find_command_name_length): Remove xdb_commands
conditional.
* defs.h (xdb_commands): Remove declaration.
* f-valprint.c (_initialize_f_valprint): Remove xdb_commands for lc.
* guile/scm-cmd.c (command_classes): Remove xdb from comment.
* infcmd.c (run_no_args_command, go_command): Remove.
(_initialize_infcmd): Remove xdb_commands for S, go, g, R and lr.
* infrun.c (xdb_handle_command): Remove.
(_initialize_infrun): Remove xdb_commands for lz and z.
* main.c (xdb_commands): Remove variable.
(captured_main): Remove "xdb" from long_options.
(print_gdb_help): Remove --xdb from help.
* python/py-cmd.c (gdbpy_initialize_commands): Remove xdb from comment.
* source.c (_initialize_source): Remove xdb_commands for D, ld, / and ?.
* stack.c (backtrace_full_command, args_plus_locals_info)
(current_frame_command): Remove.
(_initialize_stack): Remove xdb_commands for t, T and l.
* symtab.c (_initialize_symtab): Remove xdb_commands for lf and lg.
* thread.c (_initialize_thread): Remove xdb_commands condition.
* tui/tui-layout.c (tui_toggle_layout_command)
(tui_toggle_split_layout_command, tui_handle_xdb_layout): Remove.
(_initialize_tui_layout): Remove xdb_commands for td and ts.
* tui/tui-regs.c (tui_scroll_regs_forward_command)
(tui_scroll_regs_backward_command): Remove.
(_initialize_tui_regs): Remove xdb_commands for fr, gr, sr, +r and -r.
* tui/tui-win.c (tui_xdb_set_win_height_command): Remove.
(_initialize_tui_win): Remove xdb_commands for U and w.
* utils.c (pagination_on_command, pagination_off_command): Remove.
(initialize_utils): Remove xdb_commands for am and sm.
gdb/doc/ChangeLog
2015-04-11 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
* gdb.texinfo (Mode Options): Remove -xdb.
When checking R_386_GOTOFF/R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 for building shared library,
we should check SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL instead of SYMBOLIC_BIND to cover
more cases.
bfd/
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Replace SYMBOLIC_BIND
with SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL when checking R_386_GOTOFF against
protected data symbol when building shared library.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Check
R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 against undefined symbol and replace
SYMBOLIC_BIND with SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL when checking
R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 against protected data symbol when building
shared library.
ld/testsuite/
* ld-i386/i386.exp: Run protected6a.
* ld-i386/protected6.d: Renamed to ...
* ld-i386/protected6a.d: This.
* ld-x86-64/hidden4.d: New file.
* ld-x86-64/hidden4.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/hidden5.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/hidden5.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected6.d: Renamed to ...
* ld-x86-64/protected6a.d: This.
* ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run hidden4, hidden5, protected6a,
protected7a and protected7b.
R_386_GOTOFF/R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 relocation shouldn't be used against
protected data symbol on x86 since with copy relocation, address of
protected data defined in the shared library may be external.
This patch will break building shared libraries with protected data
symbols using GCCs older than GCC 5 without the bug fix for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
GCC backport request should be made in the GCC bug report above.
bfd/
PR ld/pr17709
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Also check R_386_GOTOFF
against protected data symbol when building shared library.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Also check
R_X86_64_GOTOFF64 against protected data symbol when building
shared library.
ld/testsuite/
PR ld/pr17709
* ld-i386/protected6.d: New file.
* ld-i386/protected6.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected6.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected6.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected7.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected7.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected7a.d: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected7b.d: Likewise.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.threads/signal-while-stepping-over-bp-other-thread.exp: Use
gdb_test_sequence and gdb_assert.
Diffing test results, I noticed:
-PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: b *0x0000000000400811 thread 1
+PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: b *0x00000000004007d1 thread 1
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): Use
test messages that don't include the breakpoint address.
Re-apply: commit ca3fe95e46
With copy relocation, address of protected data defined in the shared
library may be external. This patch adds extern_protected_data and
changes _bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p to return false for protected data
if extern_protected_data is true.
This patch will break building shared libraries with protected data
symbols using GCCs older than GCC 5 without the bug fix for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248
GCC backport request should be made in the GCC bug report above.
To get correct run-time behavior on Linux, glibc 2.22 or above are
required, which have the bug fix for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17711
Backports for glibc 2.21, 2.20, 2.19 and 2.18 are on hjl/pr17711/2.21,
hjl/pr17711/2.20, hjl/pr17711/2.19 and hjl/pr17711/2.18 branches,
respectively, at
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=summary
bfd/
PR ld/pr15228
PR ld/pr17709
* elf-bfd.h (elf_backend_data): Add extern_protected_data.
* elf32-i386.c (elf_backend_extern_protected_data): New.
Defined to 1.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_backend_extern_protected_data): Likewise.
* elflink.c (_bfd_elf_adjust_dynamic_copy): Don't error on
copy relocs against protected symbols if extern_protected_data
is true.
(_bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p): Don't return true on protected
non-function symbols if extern_protected_data is true.
* elfxx-target.h (elf_backend_extern_protected_data): New.
Default to 0.
(elfNN_bed): Initialize extern_protected_data with
elf_backend_extern_protected_data.
ld/testsuite/
PR ld/pr15228
PR ld/pr17709
* ld-i386/i386.exp (i386tests): Add a test for PR ld/17709.
* ld-i386/pr17709-nacl.rd: New file.
* ld-i386/pr17709.rd: Likewise.
* ld-i386/pr17709a.s: Likewise.
* ld-i386/pr17709b.s: Likewise.
* ld-i386/protected3.d: Updated.
* ld-i386/protected3.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/pr17709-nacl.rd: New file.
* ld-x86-64/pr17709.rd: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/pr17709a.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/pr17709b.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/protected3.d: Updated.
* ld-x86-64/protected3.s: Likewise.
* ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp (x86_64tests): Add a test for PR ld/17709.
Hi,
ARM linux kernel has some requirements on the address/length setting
for HW breakpoints/watchpoints, but watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp doesn't
consider them and sets HW points on various addresses. Many fails
are causes as a result:
stepi^M
Warning:^M
Could not insert hardware watchpoint 20.^M
Could not insert hardware breakpoints:^M
You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.^M
^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp: always-inserted off: watch x watch: : width 2, iter 2: base + 1: stepi advanced
watch *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2^M
Hardware watchpoint 388: *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2^M
Warning:^M
Could not insert hardware watchpoint 388.^M
Could not insert hardware breakpoints:^M
You may have requested too many hardware breakpoints/watchpoints.^M
^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp: always-inserted on: watch x watch: : width 2, iter 2: base + 1: watch *(buf.byte + 2 + 1)@2
This patch is to reflect kernel requirements in watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp
in order to skip some tests.
gdb/testsuite:
2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdb.base/watchpoint-reuse-slot.exp (valid_addr_p): Return
false for some offset and width combinations which aren't
supported by linux kernel.
PPC64 currently fails this test like:
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: step: step
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: next: next
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: no thread-specific bp: continue: continue (the program exited)
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: step: step
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: next: next
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: displaced=on: with thread-specific bp: continue: continue (the program exited)
The problem is that PPC is a non-continuable watchpoints architecture
and the displaced stepping code isn't coping with that correctly. On
such targets/architectures, a watchpoint traps _before_ the
instruction executes/completes. On a watchpoint trap, the PC points
at the instruction that triggers the watchpoint (side effects haven't
happened yet). In order to move past the watchpoint, GDB needs to
remove the watchpoint, single-step, and reinsert the watchpoint, just
like when stepping past a breakpoint.
The trouble is that if GDB is stepping over a breakpoint with
displaced stepping, and the instruction under the breakpoint triggers
a watchpoint, we get the watchpoint SIGTRAP, expecting a finished
(hard or software) step trap. Even though the thread's PC hasn't
advanced yet (must remove watchpoint for that), since we get a
SIGTRAP, displaced_step_fixup thinks the single-step finished
successfuly anyway, and calls gdbarch_displaced_step_fixup, which then
adjusts the thread's registers incorrectly.
The fix is to cancel the displaced step if we trip on a watchpoint.
handle_inferior_event then processes the watchpoint event, and starts
a new step-over, here:
...
/* At this point, we are stopped at an instruction which has
attempted to write to a piece of memory under control of
a watchpoint. The instruction hasn't actually executed
yet. If we were to evaluate the watchpoint expression
now, we would get the old value, and therefore no change
would seem to have occurred.
...
ecs->event_thread->stepping_over_watchpoint = 1;
keep_going (ecs);
return;
...
but this time, since we have a watchpoint to step over, watchpoints
are removed from the target, so the step-over succeeds.
The keep_going/resume changes are necessary because if we're stepping
over a watchpoint, we need to remove it from the target - displaced
stepping doesn't help, the copy of the instruction in the scratch pad
reads/writes to the same addresses, thus triggers the watchpoint
too... So without those changes we keep triggering the watchpoint
forever, never making progress. With non-stop that means we'll need
to pause all threads momentarily, which we can't today. We could
avoid that by removing the watchpoint _only_ from the thread that is
moving past the watchpoint, but GDB is not prepared for that today
either. For remote targets, that would need new packets, so good to
be able to step over it in-line as fallback anyway.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (displaced_step_fixup): Switch to the event ptid
earlier. If the thread stopped for a watchpoint and the
target/arch has non-continuable watchpoints, cancel the displaced
step.
(resume): Don't start a displaced step if in-line step-over info
is valid.
These tests exercise the infrun.c:proceed code that needs to know to
start new step overs (along with switch_back_to_stepped_thread, etc.).
That code is tricky to get right in the multitude of possible
combinations (at least):
(native | remote)
X (all-stop | all-stop-but-target-always-in-non-stop)
X (displaced-stepping | in-line step-over).
The first two above are properties of the target, but the different
step-over-breakpoint methods should work with any target that supports
them. This patch makes sure we always test both methods on all
targets.
Tested on x86-64 Fedora 20.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.threads/step-over-lands-on-breakpoint.exp (do_test): New
procedure, factored out from ...
(top level): ... here. Add "set displaced-stepping" testing axis.
* gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): New
parameter "displaced". Use it.
(top level): Use foreach and add "set displaced-stepping" testing
axis.
This test is currently failing like this on (at least) PPC64 and s390x:
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: step
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: next: next
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: with thread-specific bp: step: step
FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: with thread-specific bp: next: next
gdb.log:
(gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: set scheduler-locking off
step
wait_threads () at ../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.c:49
49 return 1; /* in wait_threads */
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp: no thread-specific bp: step: step
The problem is that the test assumes that both the "watch_me = 1;" and
the "other = 1;" lines compile to a single instruction each, which
happens to be true on x86, but no necessarily true everywhere else.
The result is that the test doesn't really test what it wants to test.
Fix it by looking for the instruction that triggers the watchpoint.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.c (child_function):
Remove comment.
* gdb.threads/step-over-trips-on-watchpoint.exp (do_test): Find
both the address of the instruction that triggers the watchpoint
and the address of the instruction immediately after, and use
those addresses for the test. Fix comment.
Compressed section contents should be bfd_alloced to avoid memory leak.
This patch replaces bfd_malloc and free with bfd_alloc and bfd_release
on compressed buffer in bfd_compress_section_contents. There is still
a very small memory leak when compressed section isn't smaller.
* compress.c (bfd_compress_section_contents): Replace bfd_malloc
and free with bfd_alloc and bfd_release on compressed buffer.
Release buffer if compressed section isn't smaller.
TL;DR:
When stepping over a breakpoint with displaced stepping, the core must
be notified of all signals, otherwise the displaced step fixup code
confuses a breakpoint trap in the signal handler for the expected trap
indicating the displaced instruction was single-stepped
normally/successfully.
Detailed version:
Running sigstep.exp with displaced stepping on, against my x86
software single-step branch, I got:
FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: step on breakpoint, to handler: performing step
FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: next on breakpoint, to handler: performing next
FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: continue on breakpoint, to handler: performing continue
Turning on debug logs, we see:
(gdb) step
infrun: clear_proceed_status_thread (process 32147)
infrun: proceed (addr=0xffffffffffffffff, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_DEFAULT)
infrun: resume (step=1, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_0), trap_expected=1, current thread [process 32147] at 0x400842
displaced: stepping process 32147 now
displaced: saved 0x400622: 49 89 d1 5e 48 89 e2 48 83 e4 f0 50 54 49 c7 c0
displaced: %rip-relative addressing used.
displaced: using temp reg 2, old value 0x3615eafd37, new value 0x40084c
displaced: copy 0x400842->0x400622: c7 81 1c 08 20 00 00 00 00 00
displaced: displaced pc to 0x400622
displaced: run 0x400622: c7 81 1c 08
LLR: Preparing to resume process 32147, 0, inferior_ptid process 32147
LLR: PTRACE_CONT process 32147, 0 (resume event thread)
linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG]
LLW: enter
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 32147, No child processes
LLW: waitpid 32147 received Alarm clock (stopped)
LLW: PTRACE_CONT process 32147, Alarm clock (preempt 'handle')
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes
LLW: exit (ignore)
sigchld
infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) =
infrun: -1.0.0 [process -1],
infrun: status->kind = ignore
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE
infrun: prepare_to_wait
linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG]
LLW: enter
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 32147, No child processes
LLW: waitpid 32147 received Trace/breakpoint trap (stopped)
CSBB: process 32147 stopped by software breakpoint
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes
LLW: trap ptid is process 32147.
LLW: exit
infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) =
infrun: 32147.32147.0 [process 32147],
infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
displaced: restored process 32147 0x400622
displaced: fixup (0x400842, 0x400622), insn = 0xc7 0x81 ...
displaced: restoring reg 2 to 0x3615eafd37
displaced: relocated %rip from 0x400717 to 0x400937
infrun: stop_pc = 0x400937
infrun: delayed software breakpoint trap, ignoring
infrun: no line number info
infrun: stop_waiting
0x0000000000400937 in __dso_handle ()
1: x/i $pc
=> 0x400937: and %ah,0xa0d64(%rip) # 0x4a16a1
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: displaced=on: step on breakpoint, to handler: performing step
What should have happened is that the breakpoint hit in the signal
handler should have been presented to the user. But note that
"preempt 'handle'" -- what happened instead is that
displaced_step_fixup confused the breakpoint in the signal handler for
the expected SIGTRAP indicating the displaced instruction was
single-stepped normally/successfully.
This should be affecting all software single-step targets in the same
way.
The fix is to make sure the core sees all signals when displaced
stepping, just like we already must see all signals when doing an
stepping over a breakpoint in-line. We now get:
infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) =
infrun: 570.570.0 [process 570],
infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
displaced: restored process 570 0x400622
infrun: stop_pc = 0x400842
infrun: random signal (GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM)
infrun: signal arrived while stepping over breakpoint
infrun: inserting step-resume breakpoint at 0x400842
infrun: resume (step=0, signal=GDB_SIGNAL_ALRM), trap_expected=0, current thread [process 570] at 0x400842
LLR: Preparing to resume process 570, Alarm clock, inferior_ptid process 570
LLR: PTRACE_CONT process 570, Alarm clock (resume event thread)
infrun: prepare_to_wait
linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG]
LLW: enter
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes
LLW: exit (ignore)
infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) =
infrun: -1.0.0 [process -1],
infrun: status->kind = ignore
sigchld
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_IGNORE
infrun: prepare_to_wait
linux_nat_wait: [process -1], [TARGET_WNOHANG]
LLW: enter
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 570, No child processes
LLW: waitpid 570 received Trace/breakpoint trap (stopped)
CSBB: process 570 stopped by software breakpoint
LNW: waitpid(-1, ...) returned 0, No child processes
LLW: trap ptid is process 570.
LLW: exit
infrun: target_wait (-1.0.0, status) =
infrun: 570.570.0 [process 570],
infrun: status->kind = stopped, signal = GDB_SIGNAL_TRAP
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_STOPPED
infrun: stop_pc = 0x400717
infrun: BPSTAT_WHAT_STOP_NOISY
infrun: stop_waiting
Breakpoint 3, handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35
35 done = 1;
Hardware single-step targets already behave this way, because the
Linux backends (both native and gdbserver) always report signals to
the core if the thread was single-stepping.
As mentioned in the new comment in do_target_resume, we can't fix this
by instead making the displaced_step_fixup phase skip fixing up the PC
if the single step stopped somewhere we didn't expect. Here's what
the backtrace would look like if we did that:
Breakpoint 3, handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35
35 done = 1;
1: x/i $pc
=> 0x400717 <handler+7>: movl $0x1,0x200943(%rip) # 0x601064 <done>
(gdb) bt
#0 handler (sig=14) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/sigstep.c:35
#1 <signal handler called>
#2 0x0000000000400622 in _start ()
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/sigstep.exp: displaced=on: step on breakpoint, to handler: backtrace
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (displaced_step_in_progress): New function.
(do_target_resume): Advise target to report all signals if
displaced stepping.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.base/sigstep.exp (breakpoint_to_handler)
(breakpoint_to_handler_entry): New parameter 'displaced'. Use it.
Test "backtrace" in handler.
(breakpoint_over_handler): New parameter 'displaced'. Use it.
(top level): Add new "displaced" test axis to
breakpoint_to_handler, breakpoint_to_handler_entry and
breakpoint_over_handler.
The problem is that with hardware step targets and displaced stepping,
"signal FOO" when stopped at a breakpoint steps the breakpoint
instruction at the same time it delivers a signal. This results in
tp->stepped_breakpoint set, but no step-resume breakpoint set. When
the next stop event arrives, GDB crashes. Irrespective of whether we
should do something more/different to step past the breakpoint in this
scenario (e.g., PR 18225), it's just wrong to assume there'll be a
step-resume breakpoint set (and was not the original intention).
gdb/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/18216
* infrun.c (process_event_stop_test): Don't assume a step-resume
is set if tp->stepped_breakpoint is true.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-04-10 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR gdb/18216
* gdb.threads/multiple-step-overs.exp: Remove expected eof.
Recent patch series "V2 All-stop on top of non-stop" causes a SIGSEGV
in the test case,
> -PASS: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4
> +FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4
>
> continue^M
> Continuing.^M
> ^M
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.^M
> 0x40021564 in ?? () gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/info-shared-solib1.so^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/info-shared.exp: continue to breakpoint: library function #4
and an ARM displaced stepping bug is exposed. It can be reproduced by
the modified gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp as below,
continue^M
Continuing.^M
^M
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.^M
0xa713cfcc in ?? ()^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp: continue to breakpoint: continue to test_add_rn_pc_end
This patch is to fix it.
gdb:
2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* arm-tdep.c (install_alu_reg): Update comment.
(thumb_copy_alu_reg): Remove local variable rn. Update
debugging message. Use r2 instead of r1 in the modified
instruction.
gdb/testsuite:
2015-04-10 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.S (main): Call test_add_rn_pc.
(test_add_rn_pc): New function.
* gdb.arch/arm-disp-step.exp (test_add_rn_pc): New proc.
(top level): Invoke test_add_rn_pc.
Nick Clifton