According to the specification for the CIE entries, when the CIE version is 1 then
the return address register field is always 1 byte. Readelf does this correctly in
read_cie in dwarf.c but ld does this incorrectly and always tries to read a
skip_leb128. If the value here has the top bit set then ld will incorrectly read
at least another byte, causing either an assert failure or an incorrect address to
be used in eh_frame.
I'm not sure how to generate a generic test for this as I'd need to write assembly,
and it's a bit hard to trigger. Essentially the relocated value needs to start with
something that & 0x70 != 0x10 while trying to write a personality.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elf-eh-frame.c (_bfd_elf_write_section_eh_frame): Correct CIE parse.
The fix here is to use an unsigned comparison for
if (a->NumberOfRvaAndSizes > IMAGE_NUMBEROF_DIRECTORY_ENTRIES)
include/
PR 24272
* coff/internal.h (struct internal_extra_pe_aouthdr): Change type
of SizeOfCode, SizeOfInitializedData, and SizeOfUninitializedData
to bfd_vma. Change type of SectionAlignment, FileAlignment,
Reserved1, SizeOfImage, SizeOfHeaders, CheckSum, LoaderFlags,
and NumberOfRvaAndSizes to uint32_t.
bfd/
PR 24272
* peXXigen.c (_bfd_XXi_swap_aouthdr_in): Use unsigned index.
(_bfd_XX_print_private_bfd_data_common): Adjust for type changes.
Skip symbol defined by linker when checking copy reloc on protected
symbol.
bfd/
PR ld/24276
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_check_relocs): Skip symbol defined
by linker when checking copy reloc on protected symbol.
ld/
PR ld/24276
* testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Run PR ld/24276 test.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr24276.dso: New file.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr24276.warn: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr24276.dso: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr24276.warn: Likewise.
Big section alignment requirements between source and destination of a
long call can result in making call range bigger than what's reachable
by the call opcode. Add biggest section alignment of sections between
the call site and call destination to the call distance when making
long call relaxation decision.
2019-02-20 Eric Tsai <erictsai@cadence.com>
bfd/
* elf32-xtensa.c (is_resolvable_asm_expansion): Scan output
sections between the call site and call destination and adjust
call distance by the largest alignment.
ld/
* testsuite/ld-xtensa/call_overflow.d: New test definition.
* testsuite/ld-xtensa/call_overflow1.s: New test source.
* testsuite/ld-xtensa/call_overflow2.s: New test source.
* testsuite/ld-xtensa/call_overflow3.s: New test source.
* testsuite/ld-xtensa/xtensa.exp: Add call_overflow test.
Used for the AArch64 pointer authentication code mask registers in Arm v8.3-a.
NT_ARM_PAC_MASK matches the value in Linux include/uapi/linux/elf.h
include/ChangeLog:
* elf/common.h (NT_ARM_PAC_MASK): Add define.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elf-bfd.h (elfcore_write_aarch_pauth): Add declaration.
* elf.c (elfcore_grok_aarch_pauth): New function.
(elfcore_grok_note): Check for NT_ARM_PAC_MASK.
(elfcore_write_aarch_pauth): New function.
(elfcore_write_register_note): Check for AArch64 pauth section.
git a31b8bd9a05 introduced a warning (depending on your system
headers).
PR 24225
* elf32-nios2.c (nios2_elf32_relocate_section): Check asprintf
return value.
PR 24236
* archive64.c (_bfd_archive_64_bit_slurp_armap): Move code adding
sentinel NUL to string buffer nearer to loop where it is used.
Don't go past sentinel when scanning strings, and don't write
NUL again.
* archive.c (do_slurp_coff_armap): Simplify string handling to
archive64.c style.
Recent gcc commit b4371b277f1e ("[ARC] Enable init_array support")
inhibits DT_"INIT,FINI} in favor of DT_{INIT,FINI}ARRAY.
Even prior to that, it seems ARC port is the only one with this
special DT_INIT/FINI handling in linker emulation. Removing it
doesn't seem to change any uClibc/glibc testsuite results,
so this can RIP anyways.
bfd/
2019-02-01 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
* elf32-arc.c: Delete init_str, fini_str
ld/
2019-02-01 Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
* emultempl/arclinux.em : Delete special INIT/FINI handling.
This was always supposed to be an error. Code emitted by gcc for
inline PLT calls assumes PLT is an array of addresses.
* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_relocate_section): Add %X to "unsupported
for bss-plt" warning to make it an error.
This fixes the last ld failures on SPARC64/Linux:
FAIL: Run pr18841 with libpr18841b.so
FAIL: Run pr18841 with libpr18841c.so
FAIL: Run pr18841 with libpr18841bn.so (-z now)
FAIL: Run pr18841 with libpr18841cn.so (-z now)
by mimicing what has been done on x86-64 and Aarch64 to fix the PR.
bfd/
PR ld/18841
* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_reloc_type_class): Return
reloc_class_ifunc for ifunc symbols.
* elf64-sparc.c (elf64_sparc_reloc_type_class): Likewise.
bfd * config.bfd: Move the powerpc-lynxos and powerpc-windiss targets
into the definitely obsolete list.
binutils * README-how-to-make-a-release: Add a note about updating the
obsolete targets in the bfd/config.bfd file.
commit bd7ab16b4537788ad53521c45469a1bdae84ad4a
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Feb 13 07:34:22 2018 -0800
x86-64: Generate branch with PLT32 relocation
removed check R_X86_64_PC32 relocation against protected symbols in
shared objects. Since elf_x86_64_check_relocs is called after we
have seen all input files, we can check for PC-relative relocations in
elf_x86_64_check_relocs. We should not allow PC-relative relocations
against protected symbols since address of protected function and
location of protected data may not be in the shared object.
bfd/
PR ld/24151
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_need_pic): Check
SYMBOL_DEFINED_NON_SHARED_P instead of def_regular.
(elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Move PIC check for PC-relative
relocations to ...
(elf_x86_64_check_relocs): Here.
(elf_x86_64_finish_dynamic_symbol): Use SYMBOL_DEFINED_NON_SHARED_P
to check if a symbol is defined in a non-shared object.
* elfxx-x86.h (SYMBOL_DEFINED_NON_SHARED_P): New.
ld/
PR ld/24151
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr24151a-x32.d: New file.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr24151a.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr24151a.s: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Run pr24151a and pr24151a-x32.
