The test case requires adding a nop instruction. For or1k the
instruction is `l.nop`. This change uses the correct operation.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2017-12-12 Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.c: Define nop of or1k.
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
The bp-permanent test case assumes that a NOP is exactly as long as a
software breakpoint. This is not the case for the S390 "nop"
instruction, which is 4 bytes long, while a software breakpoint is
just 2 bytes long. The "nopr" instruction has the right size and can
be used instead.
Without this patch the test case fails on S390 when trying to continue
after SIGTRAP on the permanent breakpoint:
...
Continuing.
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
test () at /home/arnez/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/bp-permanent.c:40
40 NOP; /* after permanent bp */
(gdb)
FAIL: gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: always_inserted=off, sw_watchpoint=0:
basics: stop at permanent breakpoint
With this patch the test case succeeds without any FAILs.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.c (NOP): Define as 2-byte instead of
4-byte instruction on S390.
Fix some more C compiler warnings for missing function return types
and implicit function declarations in the GDB testsuite.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.c: Include unistd.h.
* gdb.python/py-framefilter-mi.c (main): Add return type.
* gdb.python/py-framefilter.c (main): Likewise.
* gdb.trace/actions-changed.c (main): Likewise.
The gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.exp test is currently failing an
assertion recently added:
(gdb) stepi
../../src/gdb/infrun.c:2237: internal-error: resume: Assertion `sig != GDB_SIGNAL_0' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.exp: Single stepping past permanent breakpoint. (GDB internal error)
The assertion expects that the only reason we currently need to step a
breakpoint instruction is when we have a signal to deliver. But when
stepping a permanent breakpoint (with or without a signal) we also
reach this code.
The assertion is correct and the permanent breakpoints skipping code
is wrong.
Consider the case of the user doing "step/stepi" when stopped at a
permanent breakpoint. GDB's `resume' calls the
gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint hook and then happily continues
stepping:
/* Normally, by the time we reach `resume', the breakpoints are either
removed or inserted, as appropriate. The exception is if we're sitting
at a permanent breakpoint; we need to step over it, but permanent
breakpoints can't be removed. So we have to test for it here. */
if (breakpoint_here_p (aspace, pc) == permanent_breakpoint_here)
{
gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint (gdbarch, regcache);
}
But since gdbarch_skip_permanent_breakpoint already advanced the PC
manually, this ends up executing the instruction that is _after_ the
breakpoint instruction. The user-visible result is that a single-step
steps two instructions.
The gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.exp test is actually ensuring that
that's indeed how things work. It runs to an int3 instruction, does
"stepi", and checks that "leave" was executed with that "stepi". Like
this:
(gdb) b *0x0804848c
Breakpoint 2 at 0x804848c
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, 0x0804848c in standard ()
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function standard:
0x08048488 <+0>: push %ebp
0x08048489 <+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
0x0804848b <+3>: push %edi
=> 0x0804848c <+4>: int3
0x0804848d <+5>: leave
0x0804848e <+6>: ret
0x0804848f <+7>: nop
(gdb) si
0x0804848e in standard ()
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function standard:
0x08048488 <+0>: push %ebp
0x08048489 <+1>: mov %esp,%ebp
0x0804848b <+3>: push %edi
0x0804848c <+4>: int3
0x0804848d <+5>: leave
=> 0x0804848e <+6>: ret
0x0804848f <+7>: nop
End of assembler dump.
(gdb)
One would instead expect that a stepi at 0x0804848c stops at
0x0804848d, _before_ the "leave" is executed. This commit changes GDB
this way. Care is taken to make stepping into a signal handler when
the step starts at a permanent breakpoint instruction work correctly.
The patch adjusts gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.exp in this direction,
and also makes it work on x86_64 (currently it only works on i*86).
The patch also adds a new gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp test that
exercises many different code paths related to stepping permanent
breakpoints, including the stepping with signals cases. The test uses
"hack/trick" to make it work on all (or most) platforms -- it doesn't
really hard code a breakpoint instruction.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.
gdb/
2014-11-12 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* infrun.c (resume): Clear the thread's 'stepped_breakpoint' flag.
Rewrite stepping over a permanent breakpoint.
(thread_still_needs_step_over, proceed): Don't set
stepping_over_breakpoint for permanent breakpoints.
(handle_signal_stop): Don't clear stepped_breakpoint. Also pull
single-step breakpoints out of the target on hardware step
targets.
(process_event_stop_test): If stepping a permanent breakpoint
doesn't hit the step-resume breakpoint, delete the step-resume
breakpoint.
(switch_back_to_stepped_thread): Also check if the stepped thread
has advanced already on hardware step targets.
(currently_stepping): Return true if the thread stepped a
breakpoint.
gdb/testsuite/
2014-11-12 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.c: New file.
* gdb.arch/i386-bp_permanent.exp: Don't skip on x86_64.
(srcfile): Set to i386-bp_permanent.c.
(top level): Adjust to work in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes. Test
that stepi does not execute the 'leave' instruction, instead of
testing it does execute.
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.c: New file.
* gdb.base/bp-permanent.exp: New file.
Joel Brobecker
Stafford Horne
Andreas Arnez
Pedro Alves