Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joel Brobecker e2882c8578 Update copyright year range in all GDB files
gdb/ChangeLog:

        Update copyright year range in all GDB files
2018-01-02 07:38:06 +04:00
Joel Brobecker 61baf725ec update copyright year range in GDB files
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.

gdb/ChangeLog:

        Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
2017-01-01 10:52:34 +04:00
Joel Brobecker 618f726fcb GDB copyright headers update after running GDB's copyright.py script.
gdb/ChangeLog:

        Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
2016-01-01 08:43:22 +04:00
Joel Brobecker 16c3b12f19 error/internal-error printing local variable during "bt full".
One of our users reported an internal error using the "bt full"
command. In their situation, reproducing involved the following
scenario:

    (gdb) frame 1
    (gdb) bt full
    #0  0xf7783430 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
    No symbol table info available.
    #1  0xf5550aeb in waitpid () at ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81
    No locals.
    [...]
    #6  0x0fe83139 in xxxx (arg=...)
    [...some locals printed, and then...]
    <S17b> =
    [...]/dwarf2loc.c:364: internal-error: dwarf_expr_frame_base: Assertion
    `framefunc != NULL' failed.

As shown above, the error happens while GDB is trying to print the value
of <S17b>, which is a local string internally generated by the compiler.
For that, it finds that the array lives in memory, and therefore tries
to create a struct value for it via:

        case DWARF_VALUE_MEMORY:
          {
            CORE_ADDR address = dwarf_expr_fetch_address (ctx, 0);
            [...]
            retval = value_at_lazy (type, address + byte_offset);

Unfortunately for us, TYPE happens to be an array whose bounds
are dynamic. More precisely, the bounds of our arrays are described
in the debugging info as being...

 <4><2c1985e>: Abbrev Number: 33 (DW_TAG_subrange_type)
    <2c1985f>   DW_AT_type        : <0x2c1989c>
    <2c19863>   DW_AT_lower_bound : <0x2c19835>
    <2c19867>   DW_AT_upper_bound : <0x2c19841>

... which are references to a pair of local variables. For instance,
the lower bound is a reference to the following DIE

 <3><2c19835>: Abbrev Number: 32 (DW_TAG_variable)
    <2c19836>   DW_AT_name        : [...]
    <2c1983a>   DW_AT_type        : <0x2c198b4>
    <2c1983e>   DW_AT_artificial  : 1
    <2c1983e>   DW_AT_location    : 2 byte block: 91 58         (DW_OP_fbreg: -40)

As a result of the above, value_at_lazy indirectly triggers
a resolution of TYPE (via value_from_contents_and_address),
which means a resolution of TYPE's bounds, and as seen in
the DW_AT_location attribute above for our bounds, computing
the bound's location requires the frame (its location expression
uses DW_OP_fbreg).

Unfortunately for us, value_at_lazy does not get passed a frame,
we've lost the relevant frame when we try to resolve the array's
bounds. Instead, resolve_dynamic_range gets calls dwarf2_evaluate_property
with NULL as the frame:

    static struct type *
    resolve_dynamic_range (struct type *dyn_range_type,
                           struct property_addr_info *addr_stack)
    {
      [...]
      if (dwarf2_evaluate_property (prop, NULL, addr_stack, &value))
                                          ^^^^

... which then handles this by using the selected frame instead:

    if (frame == NULL && has_stack_frames ())
      frame = get_selected_frame (NULL);

In our case, the selected frame happens to be frame #1, which is
a frame where we have a minimal amount of debugging info, and in
particular, no debug info for the function itself. And because of that,
when we try to determine the frame's base...

    static void
    dwarf_expr_frame_base (void *baton, const gdb_byte **start,
                           size_t * length)
    {
      struct dwarf_expr_baton *debaton = (struct dwarf_expr_baton *) baton;
      const struct block *bl = get_frame_block (debaton->frame, NULL);
      [...]
      framefunc = block_linkage_function (bl);

... framefunc ends up being NULL, which triggers the assert
in that same function:

      gdb_assert (framefunc != NULL);

This patches avoids the issue by temporarily setting the selected_frame
before printing the locals of each frames.

This patch also adds a small testcase, which reproduces the same
issue, but with a slightly different outcome:

    (gdb) bt full
    #0  0x000000000040049a in opaque_routine ()
    No symbol table info available.
    #1  0x0000000000400532 in main () at wrong_frame_bt_full-main.c:20
            my_table_size = 3
            my_table = <error reading variable my_table (frame address is not available.)>

With this patch, the output becomes:

    (gdb) bt full
    [...]
            my_table = {0, 1, 2}

gdb/ChangeLog:

        * stack.c (print_frame_local_vars): Temporarily set the selected
        frame to FRAME while printing the frame's local variables.

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        * gdb.base/wrong_frame_bt_full-main.c: New file.
        * gdb.base/wrong_frame_bt_full-opaque.c: New file.
        * gdb.base/wrong_frame_bt_full.exp: New file.
2015-11-23 10:02:50 -08:00