4bc0608a8b
Remove the wait instructions for server processors, since they were never implemented. Also add the extra operands added to the tlbie and slbia instructions with ISA 2.06 and ISA 2.05 respectively. binutils/ * MAINTAINERS: Add myself as PPC maintainer. opcodes/ * ppc-opc.c (IH) New define. (powerpc_opcodes) <wait>: Do not enable for POWER7. <tlbie>: Add RS operand for POWER7. <slbia>: Add IH operand for POWER6. gas/testsuite/ * gas/ppc/power4.d: Add a slbia test. * gas/ppc/power4.s: Likewise. * gas/ppc/power6.d: Add slbia and tlbie tests. * gas/ppc/power6.s: Likewise. * gas/ppc/power7.d: Remove wait tests. Add a tlbie test. * gas/ppc/power7.s: Likewise.
292 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
292 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
========= Binutils Maintainers =========
|
||
|
||
This is the list of individuals responsible for maintenance and update
|
||
of the GNU Binary Utilities project. This includes the linker (ld),
|
||
the assembler (gas), the profiler (gprof), a whole suite of other
|
||
programs (binutils) and the libraries that they use (bfd and
|
||
opcodes). This project shares a common set of header files with the
|
||
GCC and GDB projects (include), so maintainership of those files is
|
||
shared amoungst the projects.
|
||
|
||
The home page for binutils is:
|
||
|
||
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/binutils.html
|
||
|
||
and patches should be sent to:
|
||
|
||
binutils@sourceware.org
|
||
|
||
with "[Patch]" as part of the subject line. Note - patches to the
|
||
top level config.guess and config.sub scripts should be sent to:
|
||
|
||
config-patches@gnu.org
|
||
|
||
and not to the binutils lists. Patches to the other top level
|
||
configure files (configure, configure.in, config-ml.in) should
|
||
be sent to the binutils lists, and copied to the gcc and gdb
|
||
lists as well (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org and
|
||
gdb-patches@sourceware.org).
|
||
|
||
--------- Blanket Write Privs ---------
|
||
|
||
The following people have permission to check patches into the
|
||
repository without obtaining approval first:
|
||
|
||
Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> (head maintainer)
|
||
Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
|
||
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
|
||
Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
|
||
Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
|
||
DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
||
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||
Michael Meissner <gnu@the-meissners.org>
|
||
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
|
||
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
|
||
|
||
--------- Maintainers ---------
|
||
|
||
Maintainers are individuals who are responsible for, and have
|
||
permission to check in changes in, certain subsets of the code. Note
|
||
that maintainers still need approval to check in changes outside of
|
||
the immediate domain that they maintain.
|
||
|
||
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
|
||
falls to the head maintainer (above). If there are several
|
||
maintainers for a given domain then responsibility falls to the first
|
||
maintainer. The first maintainer is free to devolve that
|
||
responsibility among the other maintainers.
|
||
|
||
ALPHA Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
|
||
AARCH64 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
|
||
AARCH64 Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>
|
||
ARM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||
ARM Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
|
||
ARM Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
|
||
ARM Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>
|
||
ARM (Symbian) Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
|
||
AVR Denis Chertykov <chertykov@gmail.com>
|
||
AVR Marek Michalkiewicz <marekm@amelek.gda.pl>
|
||
BFIN Jie Zhang <jzhang918@gmail.com>
|
||
BFIN Bernd Schmidt <bernd.schmidt@analog.com>
|
||
BFIN Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
|
||
BUILD SYSTEM Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
|
||
CR16 M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
|
||
CRIS Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@axis.com>
|
||
CRX M R Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@nsc.com>
|
||
DLX Nikolaos Kavvadias <nkavv@physics.auth.gr>
|
||
DWARF2 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
|
||
DWARF2 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
|
||
EPIPHANY Joern Rennecke <joern.rennecke@embecosm.com>
|
||
FR30 Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
||
FRV Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
||
FRV Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
||
GOLD Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
|
||
GOLD Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com>
|
||
H8300 Prafulla Thakare <prafulla.thakare@kpitcummins.com>
|
||
HPPA Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@nrc.ca>
|
||
HPPA elf32 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||
HPPA elf64 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> [Basic maintainance only]
|
||
IA-64 Jim Wilson <wilson@tuliptree.org>
|
||
IQ2000 Stan Cox <scox@redhat.com>
|
||
i860 Jason Eckhardt <jle@rice.edu>
|
||
ix86 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
|
||
ix86 PE Christopher Faylor <me+binutils@cgf.cx>
|
||
ix86 COFF DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
||
ix86 PE/COFF Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
|
||
ix86 INTEL MODE Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
|
||
LM32 Jon Beniston <jon@beniston.com>
|
||
M32R Doug Evans <dje@sebabeach.org>
|
||
M68HC11 M68HC12 Stephane Carrez <Stephane.Carrez@gmail.com>
|
||
M68HC11 M68HC12 Sean Keys <skeys@ipdatasys.com>
|
||
M88k Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
|
||
MACH-O Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
||
MAXQ Inderpreet Singh <inderpreetb@noida.hcltech.com>
|
||
MEP Dave Brolley <brolley@redhat.com>
|
||
METAG Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
|
||
MICROBLAZE Michael Eager <eager@eagercon.com>
|
||
MIPS Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
|
||
MMIX Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
|
||
MN10300 Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com>
|
||
MN10300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
||
Moxie Anthony Green <green@moxielogic.com>
|
||
MSP430 Dmitry Diky <diwil@spec.ru>
|
||
NDS32 Kuan-Lin Chen <kuanlinchentw@gmail.com>
|
||
NDS32 Wei-Cheng Wang <cole945@gmail.com>
|
||
NetBSD support Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
|
||
Nios II Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
|
||
Nios II Andrew Jenner <andrew@codesourcery.com>
|
||
OR1K Christian Svensson <blue@cmd.nu>
|
||
OR1K Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi>
|
||
PPC Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>
|
||
PPC Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||
PPC Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com>
|
||
PPC vector ext Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
|
||
RL78 DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
||
RX DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
|
||
RX Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
|
||
s390, s390x Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
|
||
s390, s390x Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
|
||
SCORE Mei Ligang <ligang@sunnorth.com.cn>
|
||
SH Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
|
||
SH Kaz Kojima <kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
|
||
SPARC David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
||
SPU Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
|
||
TIC4X Svein Seldal <svein@dev.seldal.com>
|
||
TIC54X Timothy Wall <twall@alum.mit.edu>
|
||
TIC6X Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
|
||
TILE-Gx Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>
|
||
TILEPro Walter Lee <walt@tilera.com>
|
||
VAX Matt Thomas <matt@netbsd.org>
|
||
VAX Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
|
||
VMS Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
||
x86_64 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
|
||
x86_64 Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
|
||
x86_64 H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
|
||
XCOFF Richard Sandiford <r.sandiford@uk.ibm.com>
|
||
XGATE Sean Keys <skeys@ipdatasys.com>
|
||
Xtensa Sterling Augustine <augustine.sterling@gmail.com>
|
||
z80 Arnold Metselaar <arnold.metselaar@planet.nl>
|
||
z8k Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
|
||
|
||
|
||
--------- CGEN Maintainers -------------
|
||
|
||
CGEN is a tool for building, amongst other things, assemblers,
|
||
disassemblers and simulators from a single description of a CPU.
|
||
It creates files in several of the binutils directories, but it
|
||
is mentioned here since there is a single group that maintains
|
||
CGEN and the files that it creates.
|
||
|
||
If you have CGEN related problems you can send email to;
|
||
|
||
cgen@sourceware.org
|
||
|
||
The current CGEN maintainers are:
|
||
|
||
Doug Evans, Frank Eigler
|
||
|
||
--------- Write After Approval ---------
|
||
|
||
Individuals with "write after approval" have the ability to check in
|
||
changes, but they must get approval for each change from someone in
|
||
one of the above lists (blanket write or maintainers).
|
||
|
||
[It's a huge list, folks. You know who you are. If you have the
|
||
*ability* to do binutils checkins, you're in this group. Just
|
||
remember to get approval before checking anything in.]
|
||
|
||
------------- Obvious Fixes -------------
|
||
|
||
Fixes for obvious mistakes do not need approval, and can be checked in
|
||
right away, but the patch should still be sent to the binutils list.
|
||
The definition of obvious is a bit hazy, and if you are not sure, then
|
||
you should seek approval first. Obvious fixes include fixes for
|
||
spelling mistakes, blatantly incorrect code (where the correct code is
|
||
also blatantly obvious), and so on. Obvious fixes should always be
|
||
small, the larger they are, the more likely it is that they contain
|
||
some un-obvious side effect or consequence.
|
||
|
||
--------- Branch Checkins ---------
|
||
|
||
If a patch is approved for check in to the mainline sources, it can
|
||
also be checked into the current release branch. Normally however
|
||
only bug fixes should be applied to the branch. New features, new
|
||
ports, etc, should be restricted to the mainline. (Otherwise the
|
||
burden of maintaining the branch in sync with the mainline becomes too
|
||
great). If you are uncertain as to whether a patch is appropriate for
|
||
the branch, ask the branch maintainer. This is:
|
||
|
||
Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com>
|
||
|
||
-------- Testsuites ---------------
|
||
|
||
In general patches to any of the binutils testsuites should be
|
||
considered generic and sent to the binutils mailing list for
|
||
approval. Patches to target specific tests are the responsibility the
|
||
relevent port maintainer(s), and can be approved/checked in by them.
|
||
Other testsuite patches need the approval of a blanket-write-priveleges
|
||
person.
|
||
|
||
-------- Configure patches ----------
|
||
|
||
Patches to the top level configure files (config.sub & config.guess)
|
||
are not the domain of the binutils project and they cannot be approved
|
||
by the binutils group. Instead they should be submitted to the config
|
||
maintainer at:
|
||
|
||
config-patches@gnu.org
|
||
|
||
--------- Creating Branches ---------
|
||
|
||
Anyone with at least write-after-approval access may create a branch
|
||
to use for their own development purposes. In keeping with FSF
|
||
policies, all patches applied to such a branch must come from people
|
||
with appropriate copyright assignments on file. All legal
|
||
requirements that would apply to any other contribution apply equally
|
||
to contributions on a branch.
|
||
|
||
Before creating the branch, you should select a name for the branch of
|
||
the form:
|
||
|
||
binutils-<org>-<name>
|
||
|
||
where "org" is the initials of your organization, or your own initials
|
||
if you are acting as an individual. For example, for a branch created
|
||
by The GNUDist Company, "tgc" would be an appropriate choice for
|
||
"org". It's up to each organization to select an appropriate choice
|
||
for "name"; some organizations may use more structure than others, so
|
||
"name" may contain additional hyphens.
|
||
|
||
Suppose that The GNUDist Company was creating a branch to develop a
|
||
port of Binutils to the FullMonty processor. Then, an appropriate
|
||
choice of branch name would be:
|
||
|
||
binutils-tgc-fm
|
||
|
||
A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some
|
||
organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you
|
||
should follow these rules:
|
||
|
||
1. The date should be the date that the branch was created.
|
||
|
||
2. The date should be numerical and in the form YYYYMMDD.
|
||
|
||
For example:
|
||
|
||
binutils-tgc-fm_20050101
|
||
|
||
would be appropriate if the branch was created on January 1st, 2005.
|
||
|
||
Having selected the branch name, create the branch as follows:
|
||
|
||
1. Check out binutils, so that you have a git checkout corresponding
|
||
to the initial state of your branch.
|
||
|
||
2. Create a tag:
|
||
|
||
git tag binutils-<org>-<name>-branchpoint
|
||
|
||
That tag will allow you, and others, to easily determine what's
|
||
changed on the branch relative to the initial state.
|
||
|
||
3. Create and push the branch:
|
||
|
||
git checkout -b binutils-<org>-<name>-branch
|
||
git push origin HEAD
|
||
|
||
4. Document the branch:
|
||
|
||
Add a description of the branch to binutils/BRANCHES, and check
|
||
that file in. All branch descriptions should be added to the
|
||
HEAD revision of the file; it doesn't help to modify
|
||
binutils/BRANCHES on a branch!
|
||
|
||
Please do not commit any patches to a branch you did not create
|
||
without the explicit permission of the person who created the branch.
|
||
|
||
Copyright (C) 2012-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||
|
||
Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
|
||
are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
|
||
notice and this notice are preserved.
|