reorganize: Enclose bitfield routines under ifdef

As they are temporarily disabled till we go thru them fixing up problems
with the BTF changes.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2019-07-02 12:28:50 -03:00
parent 2221ae30bc
commit 77d06c2d30
1 changed files with 35 additions and 33 deletions

View File

@ -185,39 +185,6 @@ static struct class_member *
return NULL;
}
static struct class_member *
class__find_next_bit_hole_of_size(struct class *class,
struct class_member *from,
size_t size)
{
struct class_member *member;
class__for_each_member_continue(class, from, member) {
if (member->tag.tag != DW_TAG_member)
continue;
if (member->bit_hole != 0 &&
member->bitfield_size <= size)
return member;
}
#if 0
/*
* FIXME: Handle the case where the bit padding is on the same bitfield
* that we're looking, i.e. we can't combine a bitfield with itclass,
* perhaps we should tag bitfields with a sequential, clearly marking
* each of the bitfields in advance, so that all the algoriths that
* have to deal with bitfields, moving them around, demoting, etc, can
* be simplified.
*/
/*
* Now look if the last member is a one member bitfield,
* i.e. if we have bit_padding
*/
if (class->bit_padding != 0)
return type__last_member(&class->type);
#endif
return NULL;
}
static bool class__move_member(struct class *class, struct class_member *dest,
struct class_member *from, const struct cu *cu,
int from_padding, const int verbose, FILE *fp)
@ -345,6 +312,40 @@ static bool class__move_member(struct class *class, struct class_member *dest,
return true;
}
#ifdef BITFIELD_REORG_ALGORITHMS_ENABLED
static struct class_member *
class__find_next_bit_hole_of_size(struct class *class,
struct class_member *from,
size_t size)
{
struct class_member *member;
class__for_each_member_continue(class, from, member) {
if (member->tag.tag != DW_TAG_member)
continue;
if (member->bit_hole != 0 &&
member->bitfield_size <= size)
return member;
}
#if 0
/*
* FIXME: Handle the case where the bit padding is on the same bitfield
* that we're looking, i.e. we can't combine a bitfield with itclass,
* perhaps we should tag bitfields with a sequential, clearly marking
* each of the bitfields in advance, so that all the algoriths that
* have to deal with bitfields, moving them around, demoting, etc, can
* be simplified.
*/
/*
* Now look if the last member is a one member bitfield,
* i.e. if we have bit_padding
*/
if (class->bit_padding != 0)
return type__last_member(&class->type);
#endif
return NULL;
}
static void class__move_bit_member(struct class *class, const struct cu *cu,
struct class_member *dest,
struct class_member *from,
@ -723,6 +724,7 @@ struct irq_cfg {
}
}
}
#endif // BITFIELD_REORG_ALGORITHMS_ENABLED
void class__reorganize(struct class *class, const struct cu *cu,
const int verbose, FILE *fp)