reorganize: Enclose bitfield routines under ifdef
As they are temporarily disabled till we go thru them fixing up problems with the BTF changes. Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2221ae30bc
commit
77d06c2d30
|
@ -185,39 +185,6 @@ static struct class_member *
|
|||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct class_member *
|
||||
class__find_next_bit_hole_of_size(struct class *class,
|
||||
struct class_member *from,
|
||||
size_t size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct class_member *member;
|
||||
|
||||
class__for_each_member_continue(class, from, member) {
|
||||
if (member->tag.tag != DW_TAG_member)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (member->bit_hole != 0 &&
|
||||
member->bitfield_size <= size)
|
||||
return member;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* FIXME: Handle the case where the bit padding is on the same bitfield
|
||||
* that we're looking, i.e. we can't combine a bitfield with itclass,
|
||||
* perhaps we should tag bitfields with a sequential, clearly marking
|
||||
* each of the bitfields in advance, so that all the algoriths that
|
||||
* have to deal with bitfields, moving them around, demoting, etc, can
|
||||
* be simplified.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now look if the last member is a one member bitfield,
|
||||
* i.e. if we have bit_padding
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (class->bit_padding != 0)
|
||||
return type__last_member(&class->type);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool class__move_member(struct class *class, struct class_member *dest,
|
||||
struct class_member *from, const struct cu *cu,
|
||||
int from_padding, const int verbose, FILE *fp)
|
||||
|
@ -345,6 +312,40 @@ static bool class__move_member(struct class *class, struct class_member *dest,
|
|||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef BITFIELD_REORG_ALGORITHMS_ENABLED
|
||||
static struct class_member *
|
||||
class__find_next_bit_hole_of_size(struct class *class,
|
||||
struct class_member *from,
|
||||
size_t size)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct class_member *member;
|
||||
|
||||
class__for_each_member_continue(class, from, member) {
|
||||
if (member->tag.tag != DW_TAG_member)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (member->bit_hole != 0 &&
|
||||
member->bitfield_size <= size)
|
||||
return member;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#if 0
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* FIXME: Handle the case where the bit padding is on the same bitfield
|
||||
* that we're looking, i.e. we can't combine a bitfield with itclass,
|
||||
* perhaps we should tag bitfields with a sequential, clearly marking
|
||||
* each of the bitfields in advance, so that all the algoriths that
|
||||
* have to deal with bitfields, moving them around, demoting, etc, can
|
||||
* be simplified.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Now look if the last member is a one member bitfield,
|
||||
* i.e. if we have bit_padding
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (class->bit_padding != 0)
|
||||
return type__last_member(&class->type);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void class__move_bit_member(struct class *class, const struct cu *cu,
|
||||
struct class_member *dest,
|
||||
struct class_member *from,
|
||||
|
@ -723,6 +724,7 @@ struct irq_cfg {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif // BITFIELD_REORG_ALGORITHMS_ENABLED
|
||||
|
||||
void class__reorganize(struct class *class, const struct cu *cu,
|
||||
const int verbose, FILE *fp)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue