So that we traverse just the data members, mostly in the reorganize code, where
we can't care less where is that the compiler put the base classes in the
layout since we can't influence how the compiler does this, it has only to
respect the layout we specify for the data members.
Well, it may well be the case that the order of the ancestor classes in the
class declaration can influence this, but I haven't checked.
Yes, another C++ism :-)
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
In the past it was always cloning and doing the reorganization steps on the
clone, now this is done by the caller, so no need to return self.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
C++ uses this, and to cache the result of the lookup at type__name time we need
to pass the cu to class__name and type__name. Big fallout because of that :-\
But now the output is mucho embelished by the humongous strings representing
C++ templates.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Will be useful to show that the intent is to traverse just the DW_TAG_member
entries in the type list. Right now there are both DW_TAG_inheritance and
DW_TAG_member entries in the ->members type list. But there will be many more
tags, like enumerations, classes, etc, that are defined inside classes, a C++
feature. This will also help with DW_TAG_namespace support.
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo