gcc/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/17_intro/porting-howto.html

765 lines
26 KiB
HTML
Raw Normal View History

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title>Libstdc++-porting-howto</title>
<meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.48">
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"><div class="article">
<div class="titlepage">
<div><h1 class="title">
<a name="libstdc++-porting-howto"></a>Libstdc++-porting-howto</h1></div>
<div><h3 class="author">Felix Natter</h3></div>
<div><div class="legalnotice">
<p class="legalnotice-title"><b>Legal Notice</b></p>
<p>
This document can be distributed under the FDL
(<a href="http://www.gnu.org" target="_top">www.gnu.org</a>)
</p>
</div></div>
<div><p class="pubdate">Tue Jun 5 20:07:49 2001</p></div>
<div><div class="revhistory"><table border="1" width="100%" summary="Revision history">
<tr><th align="left" valign="top" colspan="3"><b>Revision History</b></th></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.5</td>
<td align="left">Thu Jun 1 13:06:50 2000</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">First docbook-version.</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.8</td>
<td align="left">Sun Jul 30 20:28:40 2000</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">First released version using docbook-xml
+ second upload to libstdc++-page.
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.9</td>
<td align="left">Wed Sep 6 02:59:32 2000</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">5 new sections.</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.9.1</td>
<td align="left">Sat Sep 23 14:20:15 2000</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">added information about why file-descriptors are not in the
standard</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.9.2</td>
<td align="left">Tue Jun 5 20:07:49 2001</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">
a fix, added hint on increased portability of C-shadow-headers,
added autoconf-test HAVE_CONTAINER_AT
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.9.3</td>
<td align="left">Fri Jun 29 16:15:56 2001</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">
changed signature of nonstandard filebuf-constructor and
update the section on filebuf::attach to point to ../ext/howto.html,
added link to ../21/strings/howto.html
in sec-stringstream, changed &lt;link&gt;-tags to have content
(so that these links work),
replace &quot;user-space&quot; by &quot;global namespace&quot;
add note about gcc 3.0 and shadow-headers
add section about ostream::form and istream::scan
sec-vector-at: remove hint to modify headers
fix spelling error in sec-stringstream
</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Revision 0.9.4</td>
<td align="left">Mon Nov 5 17:01:04 2001</td>
<td align="left">fnatter</td>
</tr>
<tr><td align="left" colspan="3">
rewrite section 1.1.3 because of gnu.gcc.help-post by
Juergen Heinzl
</td></tr>
</table></div></div>
<div><div class="abstract">
<p><b>Abstract</b></p>
<p>
Some notes on porting applications from libstdc++-2.90 (or earlier
versions) to libstdc++-v3. Not speaking in terms of the GNU libstdc++
implementations, this means porting from earlier versions of the
C++-Standard to ISO 14882.
</p>
</div></div>
<hr>
</div>
<div class="toc">
<p><b>Table of Contents</b></p>
<dl>
<dt>1. <a href="#sec-nsstd">Namespace std::</a>
</dt>
<dd><dl>
<dt>1.1.1. <a href="#sec-gtkmm-hack">Using namespace
composition if the project uses a separate
namespace</a>
</dt>
<dt>1.1.2. <a href="#sec-emptyns">Defining an empty namespace std</a>
</dt>
<dt>1.1.3. <a href="#sec-avoidfqn">Avoid to use fully qualified names
(i.e. std::string)</a>
</dt>
<dt>1.1.4. <a href="#sec-osprojects">How some open-source-projects deal
with this</a>
</dt>
</dl></dd>
<dt>2. <a href="#sec-nocreate">there is no ios::nocreate/ios::noreplace
in ISO 14882</a>
</dt>
<dt>3. <a href="#sec-stream::attach">stream::attach(int
fd) is not in the standard any more</a>
</dt>
<dt>4. <a href="#sec-headers">The new headers</a>
</dt>
<dd><dl>
<dt>4.4.1. <a href="#sec-cheaders">New headers replacing C-headers</a>
</dt>
<dt>4.4.2. <a href="#sec-fstream-header">
&lt;fstream&gt; does
not define std::cout,
std::cin etc.</a>
</dt>
</dl></dd>
<dt>5. <a href="#sec-iterators">Iterators</a>
</dt>
<dt>6. <a href="#sec-macros">
Libc-macros (i.e. isspace from
&lt;cctype&gt;)</a>
</dt>
<dt>7. <a href="#sec-stream-state">State of streams</a>
</dt>
<dt>8. <a href="#sec-vector-at">vector::at is missing (i.e. gcc 2.95.x)</a>
</dt>
<dt>9. <a href="#sec-eof">Using std::char_traits&lt;char&gt;::eof()</a>
</dt>
<dt>10. <a href="#sec-string-clear">Using string::clear()/string::erase()</a>
</dt>
<dt>11. <a href="#sec-scan-form">GNU Extensions ostream::form and istream::scan</a>
</dt>
<dt>12. <a href="#sec-stringstream">Using stringstreams</a>
</dt>
<dt>13. <a href="#sec-about">About...</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</div>
<p>
In the following, when I say portable, I will refer to &quot;portable among ISO
14882-implementations&quot;. On the other hand, if I say &quot;backportable&quot; or
&quot;conservative&quot;, I am talking about &quot;compiles with older
libstdc++-implementations&quot;.
</p>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-nsstd"></a>Namespace std::</h2></div></div>
<p>
The latest C++-standard (ISO-14882) requires that the standard
C++-library is defined in namespace std::. Thus, in order to use
classes from the standard C++-library, you can do one of three
things:
<div class="itemizedlist"><ul type="disc">
<li><p>wrap your code in <b>namespace std {
... }</b> =&gt; This is not an option because only symbols
from the standard c++-library are defined in namespace std::.
</p></li>
<li><p>put a kind of
<span class="emphasis"><i>using-declaration</i></span> in your source (either
<b>using namespace std;</b> or i.e. <b>using
std::string;</b>) =&gt; works well for source-files, but
cannot be used in header-files.
</p></li>
<li><p>use a <span class="emphasis"><i>fully qualified name</i></span> for
each libstdc++-symbol (i.e. <b>std::string</b>,
<b>std::cout</b>) =&gt; can always be used
</p></li>
</ul></div>
</p>
<p>
Because there are many compilers which still use an implementation
that does not have the standard C++-library in namespace
<b>std::</b>, some care is required to support these as
well.
</p>
<p>
Namespace back-portability-issues are generally not a problem with
g++, because versions of g++ that do not have libstdc++ in
<b>std::</b> use <b>-fno-honor-std</b>
(ignore <b>std::</b>, <b>:: = std::</b>) by
default. That is, the responsibility for enabling or disabling
<b>std::</b> is on the user; the maintainer does not have
to care about it. This probably applies to some other compilers as
well.
</p>
<p>
The following sections list some possible solutions to support compilers
that cannot ignore std::.
</p>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-gtkmm-hack"></a>Using <span class="emphasis"><i>namespace
composition</i></span> if the project uses a separate
namespace</h3></div></div>
<p>
<a href="http://gtkmm.sourceforge.net" target="_top">Gtk--</a> defines
most of its classes in namespace Gtk::. Thus, it was possible to
adapt Gtk-- to namespace std:: by using a C++-feature called
<span class="emphasis"><i>namespace composition</i></span>. This is what happens if
you put a <span class="emphasis"><i>using</i></span>-declaration into a
namespace-definition: the imported symbol(s) gets imported into the
currently active namespace(s). For example:
<pre class="programlisting">
namespace Gtk {
using std::string;
class Window { ... }
}
</pre>
In this example, <b>std::string</b> gets imported into
namespace Gtk::. The result is that you don't have to use
<b>std::string</b> in this header, but still
<b>std::string</b> does not get imported into
the global namespace (::) unless the user does
<b>using namespace Gtk;</b> (which is not recommended
practice for Gtk--, so it is not a problem). Additionally, the
<b>using</b>-declarations are wrapped in macros that
are set based on autoconf-tests to either &quot;&quot; or i.e. <b>using
std::string;</b> (depending on whether the system has
libstdc++ in <b>std::</b> or not). (ideas from
<tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:llewelly@dbritsch.dsl.xmission.com">llewelly@dbritsch.dsl.xmission.com</a>&gt;</tt>, Karl Nelson
<tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:kenelson@ece.ucdavis.edu">kenelson@ece.ucdavis.edu</a>&gt;</tt>)
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-emptyns"></a>Defining an empty namespace std</h3></div></div>
<p>
By defining an (empty) namespace <b>std::</b> before
using it, you avoid getting errors on systems where no part of the
library is in namespace std:
<pre class="programlisting">
namespace std { }
using namespace std;
</pre>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-avoidfqn"></a>Avoid to use fully qualified names
(i.e. std::string)</h3></div></div>
<p>
If some compilers complain about <b>using
std::string;</b>, and if the &quot;hack&quot; for gtk-- mentioned above
does not work, then I see two solutions:
<div class="itemizedlist"><ul type="disc">
<li><p>
Define <b>std::</b> as a macro if the compiler
doesn't know about <b>std::</b>.
<pre class="programlisting">
#ifdef OLD_COMPILER
#define std
#endif
</pre>
(thanks to Juergen Heinzl who posted this solution on
gnu.gcc.help)
</p></li>
<li><p>
Define a macro NS_STD, which is defined to
either &quot;&quot; or &quot;std&quot;
based on an autoconf-test. Then you should be able to use
<b>NS_STD::string</b>, which will evaluate to
<b>::string</b> (&quot;string in the global namespace&quot;) on
systems that do not put string in std::. (This is untested)
</p></li>
</ul></div>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-osprojects"></a>How some open-source-projects deal
with this</h3></div></div>
<p>
This information was gathered around May 2000. It may not be correct
by the time you read this.
</p>
<div class="table">
<p><b>Table 1. Namespace std:: in Open-Source programs</b></p>
<table summary="Namespace std:: in Open-Source programs" border="1">
<colgroup>
<col>
<col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.clanlib.org" target="_top">clanlib</a></td>
<td>usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://pingus.seul.org" target="_top">pingus</a></td>
<td>usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.mozilla.org" target="_top">mozilla</a></td>
<td>usual</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://libsigc.sourceforge.net" target="_top">
libsigc++</a></td>
<td>conservative-impl</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div class="table">
<p><b>Table 2. Notations for categories</b></p>
<table summary="Notations for categories" border="1">
<colgroup>
<col>
<col>
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>usual</td>
<td>mostly fully qualified names and some
using-declarations (but not in headers)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>none</td>
<td>no namespace std at all</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>conservative-impl</td>
<td>wrap all
namespace-handling in macros to support compilers without
namespace-support (no libstdc++ used in headers)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>
As you can see, this currently lacks an example of a project
which uses libstdc++-symbols in headers in a back-portable way
(except for Gtk--: see the <a href="#sec-gtkmm-hack" title="Using namespace
composition if the project uses a separate
namespace">section on the gtkmm-hack</a>).
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-nocreate"></a>there is no ios::nocreate/ios::noreplace
in ISO 14882</h2></div></div>
<p>
I have seen <b>ios::nocreate</b> being used for
input-streams, most probably because the author thought it would be
more correct to specify nocreate &quot;explicitly&quot;. So you can simply
leave it out for input-streams.
</p>
<p>
For output streams, &quot;nocreate&quot; is probably the default, unless you
specify <b>std::ios::trunc</b> ? To be safe, you can open
the file for reading, check if it has been opened, and then decide
whether you want to create/replace or not. To my knowledge, even
older implementations support <b>app</b>,
<b>ate</b> and <b>trunc</b> (except for
<b>app</b> ?).
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-stream::attach"></a><b>stream::attach(int
fd)</b> is not in the standard any more</h2></div></div>
<p>
Phil Edwards <tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:pedwards@disaster.jaj.com">pedwards@disaster.jaj.com</a>&gt;</tt> writes:
It was considered and rejected. Not all environments use file
descriptors. Of those that do, not all of them use integers to represent
them.
</p>
<p>
When using libstdc++-v3, you can use
<div class="funcsynopsis">
<pre class="funcsynopsisinfo">
#include &lt;fstream&gt;
</pre>
<p><code><code class="funcdef">
<b class="fsfunc">basic_filebuf&lt;...&gt;::basic_filebuf&lt;...&gt;
</b>
</code>(<var class="pdparam">file</var>, <var class="pdparam">mode</var>, <var class="pdparam">size</var>);<br>__c_file_type* <var class="pdparam">file</var>;<br>ios_base::open_mode <var class="pdparam">mode</var>;<br>int <var class="pdparam">size</var>;</code></p>
</div>
but the the signature of this constructor has changed often, and
it might change again. For the current state of this, check
<a href="../ext/howto.html" target="_top">the howto for extensions</a>.
</p>
<p>
For a portable solution (among systems which use
filedescriptors), you need to implement a subclass of
<b>std::streambuf</b> (or
<b>std::basic_streambuf&lt;..&gt;</b>) which opens a file
given a descriptor, and then pass an instance of this to the
stream-constructor. For an example of this, refer to
<a href="http://www.josuttis.com/cppcode/fdstream.html" target="_top">fdstream example</a>
by Nicolai Josuttis.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-headers"></a>The new headers</h2></div></div>
<p>
All new headers can be seen in this <a href="headers_cc.txt" target="_top">
source-code</a>.
</p>
<p>
The old C++-headers (iostream.h etc.) are available, but gcc generates
a warning that you are using deprecated headers.
</p>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-cheaders"></a>New headers replacing C-headers</h3></div></div>
<p>
You should not use the C-headers (except for system-level
headers) from C++ programs. Instead, you should use a set of
headers that are named by prepending 'c' and, as usual,
omitting the extension (.h). For example, instead of using
<tt>&lt;math.h&gt;</tt>, you
should use <tt>&lt;cmath&gt;</tt>. In some cases this has
the advantage that the C++-header is more standardized than
the C-header (i.e. <tt>&lt;ctime&gt;</tt> (almost)
corresponds to either <tt>&lt;time.h&gt;</tt> or <tt>&lt;sys/time.h&gt;</tt>).
The standard specifies that if you include the C-style header
(<tt>&lt;math.h&gt;</tt> in
this case), the symbols will be available both in the global
namespace and in namespace <b>std::</b> (but
libstdc++ does not yet have fully compliant headers) On the
other hand, if you include only the new header (i.e. <tt>&lt;cmath&gt;</tt>), the symbols
will only be defined in namespace <b>std::</b>
(and macros will be converted to inline-functions).
</p>
<p>
For more information on this, and for information on how the
GNU C++ implementation might reuse (&quot;shadow&quot;) the C
library-functions, have a look at <a href="http://www.cantrip.org/cheaders.html" target="_top">
www.cantrip.org</a>.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h3 class="title">
<a name="sec-fstream-header"></a>
<tt>&lt;fstream&gt;</tt> does
not define <b>std::cout</b>,
<b>std::cin</b> etc.</h3></div></div>
<p>
In earlier versions of the standard,
<tt>&lt;fstream.h&gt;</tt>,
<tt>&lt;ostream.h&gt;</tt>
and <tt>&lt;istream.h&gt;</tt>
used to define
<b>cout</b>, <b>cin</b> and so on. Because
of the templatized iostreams in libstdc++-v3, you need to include
<tt>&lt;iostream&gt;</tt>
explicitly to define these.
</p>
</div>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-iterators"></a>Iterators</h2></div></div>
<p>
The following are not proper uses of iterators, but may be working
fixes for existing uses of iterators.
<div class="itemizedlist"><ul type="disc">
<li><p>you cannot do
<b>ostream::operator&lt;&lt;(iterator)</b> to
print the address of the iterator =&gt; use
<b>operator&lt;&lt; &amp;*iterator</b> instead ?
</p></li>
<li><p>you cannot clear an iterator's reference
(<b>iterator = 0</b>) =&gt; use
<b>iterator = iterator_type();</b> ?
</p></li>
<li><p>
<b>if (iterator)</b> won't work any
more =&gt; use <b>if (iterator != iterator_type())</b>
?</p></li>
</ul></div>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-macros"></a>
Libc-macros (i.e. <b>isspace</b> from
<tt>&lt;cctype&gt;</tt>)</h2></div></div>
<p>
Glibc 2.0.x and 2.1.x define the
<tt>&lt;ctype.h&gt;</tt>
-functionality as macros (isspace, isalpha etc.). Libstdc++-v3
&quot;shadows&quot; these macros as described in the <a href="#sec-cheaders" title="New headers replacing C-headers">section about
c-headers</a>.
</p>
<p>
Older implementations of libstdc++ (g++-2 for egcs 1.x and g++-3
for gcc 2.95.x), however, keep these functions as macros, and so it
is not back-portable to use fully qualified names. For example:
<pre class="programlisting">
#include &lt;cctype&gt;
int main() { std::isspace('X'); }
</pre>
will result in something like this (unless using g++-v3):
<pre class="programlisting">
std:: (__ctype_b[(int) ( ( 'X' ) )] &amp; (unsigned short int)
_ISspace ) ;
</pre>
</p>
<p>
One solution I can think of is to test for -v3 using
autoconf-macros, and define macros for each of the C-functions
(maybe that is possible with one &quot;wrapper&quot; macro as well ?).
</p>
<p>
Another solution which would fix g++ is to tell the user to modify a
header-file so that g++-2 (egcs 1.x) and g++-3 (gcc 2.95.x) define a
macro which tells <tt>&lt;ctype.h&gt;</tt> to define functions
instead of macros:
<pre class="programlisting">
// This keeps isalnum, et al from being propagated as macros.
#if __linux__
#define __NO_CTYPE 1
#endif
[ now include &lt;ctype.h&gt; ]
</pre>
</p>
<p>
Another problem arises if you put a <b>using namespace
std;</b> declaration at the top, and include <tt>&lt;ctype.h&gt;</tt>. This will result in
ambiguities between the definitions in the global namespace
(<tt>&lt;ctype.h&gt;</tt>) and the
definitions in namespace <b>std::</b>
(<b>&lt;cctype&gt;</b>).
</p>
<p>
The solution to this problem was posted to the libstdc++-v3
mailing-list:
Benjamin Kosnik <tt>&lt;<a href="mailto:bkoz@redhat.com">bkoz@redhat.com</a>&gt;</tt> writes:
&#x2018;
--enable-cshadow-headers is currently broken. As a result, shadow
headers are not being searched....
&#x2019;
This is now outdated, but gcc 3.0 still does not have fully
compliant &quot;shadow headers&quot;.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-stream-state"></a>State of streams</h2></div></div>
<p>
At least some older implementations don't have
<b>std::ios_base</b>, so you should use
<b>std::ios::badbit</b>, <b>std::ios::failbit</b>
and <b>std::ios::eofbit</b> and
<b>std::ios::goodbit</b>.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-vector-at"></a>vector::at is missing (i.e. gcc 2.95.x)</h2></div></div>
<p>
One solution is to add an autoconf-test for this:
<pre class="programlisting">
AC_MSG_CHECKING(for container::at)
AC_TRY_COMPILE(
[
#include &lt;vector&gt;
#include &lt;deque&gt;
#include &lt;string&gt;
using namespace std;
],
[
deque&lt;int&gt; test_deque(3);
test_deque.at(2);
vector&lt;int&gt; test_vector(2);
test_vector.at(1);
string test_string(&quot;test_string&quot;);
test_string.at(3);
],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_CONTAINER_AT)],
[AC_MSG_RESULT(no)])
</pre>
If you are using other (non-GNU) compilers it might be a good idea
to check for <b>string::at</b> separately.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-eof"></a>Using std::char_traits&lt;char&gt;::eof()</h2></div></div>
<p>
<pre class="programlisting">
#ifdef HAVE_CHAR_TRAITS
#define CPP_EOF std::char_traits&lt;char&gt;::eof()
#else
#define CPP_EOF EOF
#endif
</pre>
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-string-clear"></a>Using string::clear()/string::erase()</h2></div></div>
<p>
There are two functions for deleting the contents of a string:
<b>clear</b> and <b>erase</b> (the latter
returns the string).
<pre class="programlisting">
void
clear() { _M_mutate(0, this-&gt;size(), 0); }
</pre>
<pre class="programlisting">
basic_string&amp;
erase(size_type __pos = 0, size_type __n = npos)
{
return this-&gt;replace(_M_check(__pos), _M_fold(__pos, __n),
_M_data(), _M_data());
}
</pre>
The implementation of <b>erase</b> seems to be more
complicated (from libstdc++-v3), but <b>clear</b> is not
implemented in gcc 2.95.x's libstdc++, so you should use
<b>erase</b> (which is probably faster than
<b>operator=(charT*)</b>).
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-scan-form"></a>GNU Extensions ostream::form and istream::scan</h2></div></div>
<p>
These are not supported any more - use
<a href="#sec-stringstream" title="Using stringstreams">
stringstreams</a> instead.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-stringstream"></a>Using stringstreams</h2></div></div>
<p>
Libstdc++-v3 provides the new
<b>i/ostringstream</b>-classes, (<tt>&lt;sstream&gt;</tt>), but for compatibility
with older implementations you still have to use
<b>i/ostrstream</b> (<tt>&lt;strstream&gt;</tt>):
<pre class="programlisting">
#ifdef HAVE_SSTREAM
#include &lt;sstream&gt;
#else
#include &lt;strstream&gt;
#endif
</pre>
<div class="itemizedlist"><ul type="disc">
<li><p> <b>strstream</b> is considered to be
deprecated
</p></li>
<li><p> <b>strstream</b> is limited to
<b>char</b>
</p></li>
<li><p> with <b>ostringstream</b> you don't
have to take care of terminating the string or freeing its
memory
</p></li>
<li><p> <b>istringstream</b> can be re-filled
(clear(); str(input);)
</p></li>
</ul></div>
</p>
<p>
You can then use output-stringstreams like this:
<pre class="programlisting">
#ifdef HAVE_SSTREAM
std::ostringstream oss;
#else
std::ostrstream oss;
#endif
oss &lt;&lt; &quot;Name=&quot; &lt;&lt; m_name &lt;&lt; &quot;, number=&quot; &lt;&lt; m_number &lt;&lt; std::endl;
...
#ifndef HAVE_SSTREAM
oss &lt;&lt; std::ends; // terminate the char*-string
#endif
// str() returns char* for ostrstream and a string for ostringstream
// this also causes ostrstream to think that the buffer's memory
// is yours
m_label.set_text(oss.str());
#ifndef HAVE_SSTREAM
// let the ostrstream take care of freeing the memory
oss.freeze(false);
#endif
</pre>
</p>
<p>
Input-stringstreams can be used similarly:
<pre class="programlisting">
std::string input;
...
#ifdef HAVE_SSTREAM
std::istringstream iss(input);
#else
std::istrstream iss(input.c_str());
#endif
int i;
iss &gt;&gt; i;
</pre>
One (the only?) restriction is that an istrstream cannot be re-filled:
<pre class="programlisting">
std::istringstream iss(numerator);
iss &gt;&gt; m_num;
// this is not possible with istrstream
iss.clear();
iss.str(denominator);
iss &gt;&gt; m_den;
</pre>
If you don't care about speed, you can put these conversions in
a template-function:
<pre class="programlisting">
template &lt;class X&gt;
void fromString(const string&amp; input, X&amp; any)
{
#ifdef HAVE_SSTREAM
std::istringstream iss(input);
#else
std::istrstream iss(input.c_str());
#endif
X temp;
iss &gt;&gt; temp;
if (iss.fail())
throw runtime_error(..)
any = temp;
}
</pre>
Another example of using stringstreams is in <a href="../21_strings/howto.html" target="_top">this howto</a>.
</p>
<p>
I have read the Josuttis book on Standard C++, so some information
comes from there. Additionally, there is information in
&quot;info iostream&quot;, which covers the old implementation that gcc 2.95.x
uses.
</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<div class="titlepage"><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="sec-about"></a>About...</h2></div></div>
<p>
Please send any experience, additions, corrections or questions to
<a href="mailto:fnatter@gmx.net" target="_top">fnatter@gmx.net</a> or for
discussion to the libstdc++-v3-mailing-list.
</p>
</div>
</div></body>
</html>