OpenE2K/gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

loop.texi: New file.

Browse Source 
* doc/loop.texi: New file.
	* doc/gccint.texi: Reference loop.texi.
	* Makefile.in (loop.texi): Add.

From-SVN: r117277
This commit is contained in:
Zdenek Dvorak 2006-09-28 14:02:11 +02:00 committed by Zdenek Dvorak
parent c6c621d415
commit 01e0ef5af0
4 changed files with 557 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gcc/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2006-09-28 Zdenek Dvorak <dvorakz@suse.cz>
* doc/loop.texi: New file.
* doc/gccint.texi: Reference loop.texi.
* Makefile.in (loop.texi): Add.
2006-09-27 Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
* config/darwin.h (ENABLE_EXECUTE_STACK): New, use getpagesize not

3
gcc/Makefile.in
View File

@ -3380,7 +3380,8 @@ TEXI_GCCINT_FILES = gccint.texi gcc-common.texi gcc-vers.texi \
rtl.texi md.texi tm.texi hostconfig.texi fragments.texi \
configfiles.texi collect2.texi headerdirs.texi funding.texi \
gnu.texi gpl.texi fdl.texi contrib.texi languages.texi \
sourcebuild.texi gty.texi libgcc.texi cfg.texi tree-ssa.texi
sourcebuild.texi gty.texi libgcc.texi cfg.texi tree-ssa.texi \
loop.texi
TEXI_GCCINSTALL_FILES = install.texi install-old.texi fdl.texi

2
gcc/doc/gccint.texi
View File

@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ Additional tutorial information is linked to from
* RTL:: The intermediate representation that most passes work on.
* Control Flow:: Maintaining and manipulating the control flow graph.
* Tree SSA:: Analysis and optimization of the tree representation.
* Loop Representation:: Analysis and representation of loops
* Machine Desc:: How to write machine description instruction patterns.
* Target Macros:: How to write the machine description C macros and functions.
* Host Config:: Writing the @file{xm-@var{machine}.h} file.
@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ Additional tutorial information is linked to from
@include passes.texi
@include c-tree.texi
@include tree-ssa.texi
@include loop.texi
@include rtl.texi
@include cfg.texi
@include md.texi

547
gcc/doc/loop.texi Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,547 @@
@c Copyright (c) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
@c This is part of the GCC manual.
@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
@c ---------------------------------------------------------------------
@c Loop Representation
@c ---------------------------------------------------------------------
@node Loop Representation
@chapter Analysis and Representation of Loops
GCC provides extensive infrastructure for work with natural loops, i.e.,
strongly connected components of CFG with only one entry block. This
chapter describes representation of loops in GCC, both on GIMPLE and in
RTL, as well as the interfaces to loop-related analyses (induction
variable analysis and number of iterations analysis).
@menu
* Loop representation:: Representation and analysis of loops.
* Loop querying:: Getting information about loops.
* Loop manipulation:: Loop manipulation functions.
* LCSSA:: Loop-closed SSA form.
* Scalar evolutions:: Induction variables on GIMPLE.
* loop-iv:: Induction variables on RTL.
* Number of iterations:: Number of iterations analysis.
* Dependency analysis:: Data dependency analysis.
* Lambda:: Linear loop transformations framework.
@end menu
@node Loop representation
@section Loop representation
@cindex Loop representation
@cindex Loop analysis
This chapter describes the representation of loops in GCC, and functions
that can be used to build, modify and analyze this representation. Most
of the interfaces and data structures are declared in @file{cfgloop.h}.
At the moment, loop structures are analyzed and this information is
updated only by the optimization passes that deal with loops, but some
efforts are being made to make it available throughout most of the
optimization passes.
In general, a natural loop has one entry block (header) and possibly
several back edges (latches) leading to the header from the inside of
the loop. Loops with several latches may appear if several loops share
a single header, or if there is a branching in the middle of the loop.
The representation of loops in GCC however allows only loops with a
single latch. During loop analysis, headers of such loops are split and
forwarder blocks are created in order to disambiguate their structures.
A heuristic based on profile information is used to determine whether
the latches correspond to sub-loops or to control flow in a single loop.
This means that the analysis sometimes changes the CFG, and if you run
it in the middle of an optimization pass, you must be able to deal with
the new blocks.
Body of the loop is the set of blocks that are dominated by its header,
and reachable from its latch against the direction of edges in CFG. The
loops are organized in a containment hierarchy (tree) such that all the
loops immediately contained inside loop L are the children of L in the
tree. This tree is represented by the @code{struct loops} structure.
The root of this tree is a fake loop that contains all blocks in the
function. Each of the loops is represented in a @code{struct loop}
structure. Each loop is assigned an index (@code{num} field of the
@code{struct loop} structure), and the pointer to the loop is stored in
the corresponding field of the @code{parray} field of the loops
structure. Index of a sub-loop is always greater than the index of its
super-loop. The indices do not have to be continuous, there may be
empty (@code{NULL}) entries in the @code{parray} created by deleting
loops. The index of a loop never changes. The first unused index is
stored in the @code{num} field of the loops structure.
Each basic block contains the reference to the innermost loop it belongs
to (@code{loop_father}). For this reason, it is only possible to have
one @code{struct loops} structure initialized at the same time for each
CFG. It is recommended to use the global variable @code{current_loops}
to contain the @code{struct loops} structure, especially if the loop
structures are updated throughout several passes. Many of the loop
manipulation functions assume that dominance information is up-to-date.
The loops are analyzed through @code{loop_optimizer_init} function. The
argument of this function is a set of flags represented in an integer
bitmask. These flags specify what other properties of the loop
structures should be calculated/enforced and preserved later:
@itemize
@item @code{LOOPS_HAVE_PREHEADERS}: Forwarder blocks are created in such
a way that each loop has only one entry edge, and additionally, the
source block of this entry edge has only one successor. This creates a
natural place where the code can be moved out of the loop, and ensures
that the entry edge of the loop leads from its immediate super-loop.
@item @code{LOOPS_HAVE_SIMPLE_LATCHES}: Forwarder blocks are created to
force the latch block of each loop to have only one successor. This
ensures that the latch of the loop does not belong to any of its
sub-loops, and makes manipulation with the loops significantly easier.
Most of the loop manipulation functions assume that the loops are in
this shape. Note that with this flag, the ``normal'' loop without any
control flow inside and with one exit consists of two basic blocks.
@item @code{LOOPS_HAVE_MARKED_IRREDUCIBLE_REGIONS}: Basic blocks and
edges in the strongly connected components that are not natural loops
(have more than one entry block) are marked with
@code{BB_IRREDUCIBLE_LOOP} and @code{EDGE_IRREDUCIBLE_LOOP} flags. The
flag is not set for blocks and edges that belong to natural loops that
are in such an irreducible region (but it is set for the entry and exit
edges of such a loop, if they lead to/from this region).
@item @code{LOOPS_HAVE_MARKED_SINGLE_EXITS}: If a loop has exactly one
exit edge, this edge is stored in @code{single_exit} field of the loop
structure. @code{NULL} is stored there otherwise.
@end itemize
These properties may also be computed/enforced later, using functions
@code{create_preheaders}, @code{force_single_succ_latches},
@code{mark_irreducible_loops} and @code{mark_single_exit_loops}.
The memory occupied by the loops structures should be freed with
@code{loop_optimizer_finalize} function.
The CFG manipulation functions in general do not update loop structures.
Specialized versions that additionally do so are provided for the most
common tasks. On GIMPLE, @code{cleanup_tree_cfg_loop} function can be
used to cleanup CFG while updating the loops structures if
@code{current_loops} is set.
@node Loop querying
@section Loop querying
@cindex Loop querying
The functions to query the information about loops are declared in
@file{cfgloop.h}. Some of the information can be taken directly from
the structures. @code{loop_father} field of each basic block contains
the innermost loop to that the block belongs. The most useful fields of
loop structure (that are kept up-to-date at all times) are:
@itemize
@item @code{header}, @code{latch}: Header and latch basic blocks of the
loop.
@item @code{num_nodes}: Number of basic blocks in the loop (including
the basic blocks of the sub-loops).
@item @code{depth}: The depth of the loop in the loops tree, i.e., the
number of super-loops of the loop.
@item @code{outer}, @code{inner}, @code{next}: The super-loop, the first
sub-loop, and the sibling of the loop in the loops tree.
@item @code{single_exit}: The exit edge of the loop, if the loop has
exactly one exit and the loops were analyzed with
LOOPS_HAVE_MARKED_SINGLE_EXITS.
@end itemize
There are other fields in the loop structures, many of them used only by
some of the passes, or not updated during CFG changes; in general, they
should not be accessed directly.
The most important functions to query loop structures are:
@itemize
@item @code{flow_loops_dump}: Dumps the information about loops to a
file.
@item @code{verify_loop_structure}: Checks consistency of the loop
structures.
@item @code{loop_latch_edge}: Returns the latch edge of a loop.
@item @code{loop_preheader_edge}: If loops have preheaders, returns
the preheader edge of a loop.
@item @code{flow_loop_nested_p}: Tests whether loop is a sub-loop of
another loop.
@item @code{flow_bb_inside_loop_p}: Tests whether a basic block belongs
to a loop (including its sub-loops).
@item @code{find_common_loop}: Finds the common super-loop of two loops.
@item @code{superloop_at_depth}: Returns the super-loop of a loop with
the given depth.
@item @code{tree_num_loop_insns}, @code{num_loop_insns}: Estimates the
number of insns in the loop, on GIMPLE and on RTL.
@item @code{loop_exit_edge_p}: Tests whether edge is an exit from a
loop.
@item @code{mark_loop_exit_edges}: Marks all exit edges of all loops
with @code{EDGE_LOOP_EXIT} flag.
@item @code{get_loop_body}, @code{get_loop_body_in_dom_order},
@code{get_loop_body_in_bfs_order}: Enumerates the basic blocks in the
loop in depth-first search order in reversed CFG, ordered by dominance
relation, and breath-first search order, respectively.
@item @code{get_loop_exit_edges}: Enumerates the exit edges of a loop.
@item @code{just_once_each_iteration_p}: Returns true if the basic block
is executed exactly once during each iteration of a loop (that is, it
does not belong to a sub-loop, and it dominates the latch of the loop).
@end itemize
@node Loop manipulation
@section Loop manipulation
@cindex Loop manipulation
The loops tree can be manipulated using the following functions:
@itemize
@item @code{flow_loop_tree_node_add}: Adds a node to the tree.
@item @code{flow_loop_tree_node_remove}: Removes a node from the tree.
@item @code{add_bb_to_loop}: Adds a basic block to a loop.
@item @code{remove_bb_from_loops}: Removes a basic block from loops.
@end itemize
The specialized versions of several low-level CFG functions that also
update loop structures are provided:
@itemize
@item @code{loop_split_edge_with}: Splits an edge, and places a
specified RTL code on it. On GIMPLE, the function can still be used,
but the code must be NULL.
@item @code{bsi_insert_on_edge_immediate_loop}: Inserts code on edge,
splitting it if necessary. Only works on GIMPLE.
@item @code{remove_path}: Removes an edge and all blocks it dominates.
@item @code{loop_commit_inserts}: Commits insertions scheduled on edges,
and sets loops for the new blocks. This function can only be used on
GIMPLE.
@item @code{split_loop_exit_edge}: Splits exit edge of the loop,
ensuring that PHI node arguments remain in the loop (this ensures that
loop-closed SSA form is preserved). Only useful on GIMPLE.
@end itemize
Finally, there are some higher-level loop transformations implemented.
While some of them are written so that they should work on non-innermost
loops, they are mostly untested in that case, and at the moment, they
are only reliable for the innermost loops:
@itemize
@item @code{create_iv}: Creates a new induction variable. Only works on
GIMPLE. @code{standard_iv_increment_position} can be used to find a
suitable place for the iv increment.
@item @code{duplicate_loop_to_header_edge},
@code{tree_duplicate_loop_to_header_edge}: These functions (on RTL and
on GIMPLE) duplicate the body of the loop prescribed number of times on
one of the edges entering loop header, thus performing either loop
unrolling or loop peeling. @code{can_duplicate_loop_p}
(@code{can_unroll_loop_p} on GIMPLE) must be true for the duplicated
loop.
@item @code{loop_version}, @code{tree_ssa_loop_version}: These function
create a copy of a loop, and a branch before them that selects one of
them depending on the prescribed condition. This is useful for
optimizations that need to verify some assumptions in runtime (one of
the copies of the loop is usually left unchanged, while the other one is
transformed in some way).
@item @code{tree_unroll_loop}: Unrolls the loop, including peeling the
extra iterations to make the number of iterations divisible by unroll
factor, updating the exit condition, and removing the exits that now
cannot be taken. Works only on GIMPLE.
@end itemize
@node LCSSA
@section Loop-closed SSA form
@cindex LCSSA
@cindex Loop-closed SSA form
Throughout the loop optimizations on tree level, one extra condition is
enforced on the SSA form: No SSA name is used outside of the loop in
that it is defined. The SSA form satisfying this condition is called
``loop-closed SSA form'' -- LCSSA. To enforce LCSSA, PHI nodes must be
created at the exits of the loops for the SSA names that are used
outside of them. Only the real operands (not virtual SSA names) are
held in LCSSA, in order to save memory.
There are various benefits of LCSSA:
@itemize
@item Many optimizations (value range analysis, final value
replacement) are interested in the values that are defined in the loop
and used outside of it, i.e., exactly those for that we create new PHI
nodes.
@item In induction variable analysis, it is not necessary to specify the
loop in that the analysis should be performed -- the scalar evolution
analysis always returns the results with respect to the loop in that the
SSA name is defined.
@item It makes updating of SSA form during loop transformations simpler.
Without LCSSA, operations like loop unrolling may force creation of PHI
nodes arbitrarily far from the loop, while in LCSSA, the SSA form can be
updated locally. However, since we only keep real operands in LCSSA, we
cannot use this advantage (we could have local updating of real
operands, but it is not much more efficient than to use generic SSA form
updating for it as well; the amount of changes to SSA is the same).
@end itemize
However, it also means LCSSA must be updated. This is usually
straightforward, unless you create a new value in loop and use it
outside, or unless you manipulate loop exit edges (functions are
provided to make these manipulations simple).
@code{rewrite_into_loop_closed_ssa} is used to rewrite SSA form to
LCSSA, and @code{verify_loop_closed_ssa} to check that the invariant of
LCSSA is preserved.
@node Scalar evolutions
@section Scalar evolutions
@cindex Scalar evolutions
@cindex IV analysis on GIMPLE
Scalar evolutions (SCEV) are used to represent results of induction
variable analysis on GIMPLE. They enable us to represent variables with
complicated behavior in a simple and consistent way (we only use it to
express values of polynomial induction variables, but it is possible to
extend it). The interfaces to SCEV analysis are declared in
@file{tree-scalar-evolution.h}. To use scalar evolutions analysis,
@code{scev_initialize} must be used. To stop using SCEV,
@code{scev_finalize} should be used. SCEV analysis caches results in
order to save time and memory. This cache however is made invalid by
most of the loop transformations, including removal of code. If such a
transformation is performed, @code{scev_reset} must be called to clean
the caches.
Given an SSA name, its behavior in loops can be analyzed using the
@code{analyze_scalar_evolution} function. The returned SCEV however
does not have to be fully analyzed and it may contain references to
other SSA names defined in the loop. To resolve these (potentially
recursive) references, @code{instantiate_parameters} or
@code{resolve_mixers} functions must be used.
@code{instantiate_parameters} is useful when you use the results of SCEV
only for some analysis, and when you work with whole nest of loops at
once. It will try replacing all SSA names by their SCEV in all loops,
including the super-loops of the current loop, thus providing a complete
information about the behavior of the variable in the loop nest.
@code{resolve_mixers} is useful if you work with only one loop at a
time, and if you possibly need to create code based on the value of the
induction variable. It will only resolve the SSA names defined in the
current loop, leaving the SSA names defined outside unchanged, even if
their evolution in the outer loops is known.
The SCEV is a normal tree expression, except for the fact that it may
contain several special tree nodes. One of them is
@code{SCEV_NOT_KNOWN}, used for SSA names whose value cannot be
expressed. The other one is @code{POLYNOMIAL_CHREC}. Polynomial chrec
has three arguments -- base, step and loop (both base and step may
contain further polynomial chrecs). Type of the expression and of base
and step must be the same. A variable has evolution
@code{POLYNOMIAL_CHREC(base, step, loop)} if it is (in the specified
loop) equivalent to @code{x_1} in the following example
@smallexample
while (...)
@{
x_1 = phi (base, x_2);
x_2 = x_1 + step;
@}
@end smallexample
Note that this includes the language restrictions on the operations.
For example, if we compile C code and @code{x} has signed type, then the
overflow in addition would cause undefined behavior, and we may assume
that this does not happen. Hence, the value with this SCEV cannot
overflow (which restricts the number of iterations of such a loop).
In many cases, one wants to restrict the attention just to affine
induction variables. In this case, the extra expressive power of SCEV
is not useful, and may complicate the optimizations. In this case,
@code{simple_iv} function may be used to analyze a value -- the result
is a loop-invariant base and step.
@node loop-iv
@section IV analysis on RTL
@cindex IV analysis on RTL
The induction variable on RTL is simple and only allows analysis of
affine induction variables, and only in one loop at once. The interface
is declared in @file{cfgloop.h}. Before analyzing induction variables
in a loop L, @code{iv_analysis_loop_init} function must be called on L.
After the analysis (possibly calling @code{iv_analysis_loop_init} for
several loops) is finished, @code{iv_analysis_done} should be called.
The following functions can be used to access the results of the
analysis:
@itemize
@item @code{iv_analyze}: Analyzes a single register used in the given
insn. If no use of the register in this insn is found, the following
insns are scanned, so that this function can be called on the insn
returned by get_condition.
@item @code{iv_analyze_result}: Analyzes result of the assignment in the
given insn.
@item @code{iv_analyze_expr}: Analyzes a more complicated expression.
All its operands are analyzed by @code{iv_analyze}, and hence they must
be used in the specified insn or one of the following insns.
@end itemize
The description of the induction variable is provided in @code{struct
rtx_iv}. In order to handle subregs, the representation is a bit
complicated; if the value of the @code{extend} field is not
@code{UNKNOWN}, the value of the induction variable in the i-th
iteration is
@smallexample
delta + mult * extend_@{extend_mode@} (subreg_@{mode@} (base + i * step)),
@end smallexample
with the following exception: if @code{first_special} is true, then the
value in the first iteration (when @code{i} is zero) is @code{delta +
mult * base}. However, if @code{extend} is equal to @code{UNKNOWN},
then @code{first_special} must be false, @code{delta} 0, @code{mult} 1
and the value in the i-th iteration is
@smallexample
subreg_@{mode@} (base + i * step)
@end smallexample
The function @code{get_iv_value} can be used to perform these
calculations.
@node Number of iterations
@section Number of iterations analysis
@cindex Number of iterations analysis
Both on GIMPLE and on RTL, there are functions available to determine
the number of iterations of a loop, with a similar interface. In many
cases, it is not possible to determine number of iterations
unconditionally -- the determined number is correct only if some
assumptions are satisfied. The analysis tries to verify these
conditions using the information contained in the program; if it fails,
the conditions are returned together with the result. The following
information and conditions are provided by the analysis:
@itemize
@item @code{assumptions}: If this condition is false, the rest of
the information is invalid.
@item @code{noloop_assumptions} on RTL, @code{may_be_zero} on GIMPLE: If
this condition is true, the loop exits in the first iteration.
@item @code{infinite}: If this condition is true, the loop is infinite.
This condition is only available on RTL. On GIMPLE, conditions for
finiteness of the loop are included in @code{assumptions}.
@item @code{niter_expr} on RTL, @code{niter} on GIMPLE: The expression
that gives number of iterations. The number of iterations is defined as
the number of executions of the loop latch.
@end itemize
Both on GIMPLE and on RTL, it necessary for the induction variable
analysis framework to be initialized (SCEV on GIMPLE, loop-iv on RTL).
On GIMPLE, the results are stored to @code{struct tree_niter_desc}
structure. Number of iterations before the loop is exited through a
given exit can be determined using @code{number_of_iterations_exit}
function. On RTL, the results are returned in @code{struct niter_desc}
structure. The corresponding function is named
@code{check_simple_exit}. There are also functions that pass through
all the exits of a loop and try to find one with easy to determine
number of iterations -- @code{find_loop_niter} on GIMPLE and
@code{find_simple_exit} on RTL. Finally, there are functions that
provide the same information, but additionally cache it, so that
repeated calls to number of iterations are not so costly --
@code{number_of_iterations_in_loop} on GIMPLE and
@code{get_simple_loop_desc} on RTL.
Note that some of these functions may behave slightly differently than
others -- some of them return only the expression for the number of
iterations, and fail if there are some assumptions. The function
@code{number_of_iterations_in_loop} works only for single-exit loops,
and it returns the value for number of iterations higher by one with
respect to all other functions (i.e., it returns number of executions of
the exit statement, not of the loop latch).
@node Dependency analysis
@section Data Dependency Analysis
@cindex Data Dependency Analysis
The code for the data dependence analysis can be found in
@file{tree-data-ref.c} and its interface and data structures are
described in @file{tree-data-ref.h}. The function that computes the
data dependences for all the array and pointer references for a given
loop is @code{compute_data_dependences_for_loop}. This function is
currently used by the linear loop transform and the vectorization
passes. Before calling this function, one has to allocate two vectors:
a first vector will contain the set of data references that are
contained in the analyzed loop body, and the second vector will contain
the dependence relations between the data references. Thus if the
vector of data references is of size @code{n}, the vector containing the
dependence relations will contain @code{n*n} elements. However if the
analyzed loop contains side effects, such as calls that potentially can
interfere with the data references in the current analyzed loop, the
analysis stops while scanning the loop body for data references, and
inserts a single @code{chrec_dont_know} in the dependence relation
array.
The data references are discovered in a particular order during the
scanning of the loop body: the loop body is analyzed in execution order,
and the data references of each statement are pushed at the end of the
data reference array. Two data references syntactically occur in the
program in the same order as in the array of data references. This
syntactic order is important in some classical data dependence tests,
and mapping this order to the elements of this array avoids costly
queries to the loop body representation.
The structure describing the relation between two data references is
@code{data_dependence_relation} and the shorter name for a pointer to
such a structure is @code{ddr_p}. This structure contains:
@itemize
@item a pointer to each data reference,
@item a tree node @code{are_dependent} that is set to @code{chrec_known}
if the analysis has proved that there is no dependence between these two
data references, @code{chrec_dont_know} if the analysis was not able to
determine any useful result and potentially there could exist a
dependence between these data references, and @code{are_dependent} is
set to @code{NULL_TREE} if there exist a dependence relation between the
data references, and the description of this dependence relation is
given in the @code{subscripts}, @code{dir_vects}, and @code{dist_vects}
arrays,
@item a boolean that determines whether the dependence relation can be
represented by a classical distance vector,
@item an array @code{subscripts} that contains a description of each
subscript of the data references. Given two array accesses a
subscript is the tuple composed of the access functions for a given
dimension. For example, given @code{A[f1][f2][f3]} and
@code{B[g1][g2][g3]}, there are three subscripts: @code{(f1, g1), (f2,
g2), (f3, g3)}.
@item two arrays @code{dir_vects} and @code{dist_vects} that contain
classical representations of the data dependences under the form of
direction and distance dependence vectors,
@item an array of loops @code{loop_nest} that contains the loops to
which the distance and direction vectors refer to.
@end itemize
Several functions for pretty printing the information extracted by the
data dependence analysis are available: @code{dump_ddrs} prints with a
maximum verbosity the details of a data dependence relations array,
@code{dump_dist_dir_vectors} prints only the classical distance and
direction vectors for a data dependence relations array, and
@code{dump_data_references} prints the details of the data references
contained in a data reference array.
@node Lambda
@section Linear loop transformations framework
@cindex Linear loop transformations framework
Lambda is a framework that allows transformations of loops using
non-singular matrix based transformations of the iteration space and
loop bounds. This allows compositions of skewing, scaling, interchange,
and reversal transformations. These transformations are often used to
improve cache behavior or remove inner loop dependencies to allow
parallelization and vectorization to take place.
To perform these transformations, Lambda requires that the loopnest be
converted into a internal form that can be matrix transformed easily.
To do this conversion, the function
@code{gcc_loopnest_to_lambda_loopnest} is provided. If the loop cannot
be transformed using lambda, this function will return NULL.
Once a @code{lambda_loopnest} is obtained from the conversion function,
it can be transformed by using @code{lambda_loopnest_transform}, which
takes a transformation matrix to apply. Note that it is up to the
caller to verify that the transformation matrix is legal to apply to the
loop (dependence respecting, etc). Lambda simply applies whatever
matrix it is told to provide. It can be extended to make legal matrices
out of any non-singular matrix, but this is not currently implemented.
Legality of a matrix for a given loopnest can be verified using
@code{lambda_transform_legal_p}.
Given a transformed loopnest, conversion back into gcc IR is done by
@code{lambda_loopnest_to_gcc_loopnest}. This function will modify the
loops so that they match the transformed loopnest.