Reduce usage of limited_with clauses with -fdump-ada-spec
The problem is that subtypes are not part of the limited view of a package so we need to use types in conjunction with limited_with clauses, which is not always desirable as this yields less portable Ada bindings. The patch also contains a small enhancement for complex floating-point types. gcc/c-family/ * c-ada-spec.cc (dump_ada_node) <COMPLEX_TYPE>: Deal with usual floating-point complex types. <POINTER_TYPE>: Do not use limited_with clause if the designated type is a scalar type.
This commit is contained in:
parent
297a69068d
commit
0d189b16f8
|
@ -2105,6 +2105,21 @@ dump_ada_node (pretty_printer *buffer, tree node, tree type, int spc,
|
|||
append_withs ("Interfaces.C.Extensions", false);
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "Extensions.CFloat_128");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (TREE_TYPE (node) == float_type_node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
append_withs ("Ada.Numerics.Complex_Types", false);
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "Ada.Numerics.Complex_Types.Complex");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (TREE_TYPE (node) == double_type_node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
append_withs ("Ada.Numerics.Long_Complex_Types", false);
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "Ada.Numerics.Long_Complex_Types.Complex");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (TREE_TYPE (node) == long_double_type_node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
append_withs ("Ada.Numerics.Long_Long_Complex_Types", false);
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "Ada.Numerics.Long_Long_Complex_Types.Complex");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "<complex>");
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -2190,7 +2205,7 @@ dump_ada_node (pretty_printer *buffer, tree node, tree type, int spc,
|
|||
{
|
||||
tree ref_type = TREE_TYPE (node);
|
||||
const unsigned int quals = TYPE_QUALS (ref_type);
|
||||
bool is_access = false;
|
||||
bool is_access;
|
||||
|
||||
if (VOID_TYPE_P (ref_type))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2242,7 +2257,10 @@ dump_ada_node (pretty_printer *buffer, tree node, tree type, int spc,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!package_prefix)
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "access");
|
||||
{
|
||||
is_access = false;
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "access");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (ref_type))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!type || TREE_CODE (type) != FUNCTION_DECL)
|
||||
|
@ -2256,17 +2274,21 @@ dump_ada_node (pretty_printer *buffer, tree node, tree type, int spc,
|
|||
pp_string (buffer, "all ");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (quals & TYPE_QUAL_CONST)
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "in ");
|
||||
{
|
||||
is_access = false;
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "in ");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
is_access = true;
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "access ");
|
||||
/* ??? should be configurable: access or in out. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
is_access = true;
|
||||
/* We want to use regular with clauses for scalar types,
|
||||
as they are not involved in circular declarations. */
|
||||
is_access = false;
|
||||
pp_string (buffer, "access ");
|
||||
|
||||
if (!name_only)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue