aarch64: Add a couple of extra stack-protector tests
These tests were inspired by corresponding arm ones. They already pass. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-3.c: New test. * gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-4.c: Likewise.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f65ebb5210
commit
0f0b00033a
45
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-3.c
Normal file
45
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-3.c
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
/* { dg-do run } */
|
||||
/* { dg-require-effective-target fstack_protector } */
|
||||
/* { dg-options "-fstack-protector-all -O2" } */
|
||||
|
||||
extern volatile long *stack_chk_guard_ptr;
|
||||
|
||||
void __attribute__ ((noipa))
|
||||
f (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
volatile int x;
|
||||
/* Munging the contents of __stack_chk_guard should trigger a
|
||||
stack-smashing failure for this function. */
|
||||
*stack_chk_guard_ptr += 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define CHECK(REG) "\tcmp\tx0, " #REG "\n\tbeq\t1f\n"
|
||||
|
||||
asm (
|
||||
" .pushsection .data\n"
|
||||
" .align 3\n"
|
||||
"stack_chk_guard_ptr:\n"
|
||||
#if __ILP32__
|
||||
" .word __stack_chk_guard\n"
|
||||
#else
|
||||
" .xword __stack_chk_guard\n"
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
" .weak __stack_chk_guard\n"
|
||||
"__stack_chk_guard:\n"
|
||||
" .word 0xdead4321\n"
|
||||
" .word 0xbeef8765\n"
|
||||
" .text\n"
|
||||
" .type __stack_chk_fail, %function\n"
|
||||
"__stack_chk_fail:\n"
|
||||
" mov x0, #0\n"
|
||||
" b exit\n"
|
||||
" .size __stack_chk_fail, .-__stack_chk_fail\n"
|
||||
" .popsection"
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
main (void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
f ();
|
||||
__builtin_abort ();
|
||||
}
|
6
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-4.c
Normal file
6
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-4.c
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
/* { dg-do run } */
|
||||
/* { dg-require-effective-target fstack_protector } */
|
||||
/* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
|
||||
/* { dg-options "-fstack-protector-all -O2 -fpic" } */
|
||||
|
||||
#include "stack-protector-3.c"
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user