OpenE2K/gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Ada] Remove repeated description of support for Address clauses

Browse Source 
The GNAT behaviour regarding the Ada RM requirement to support Address
clauses for imported subprograms was documented twice: in section about
packed types (which was a mistake) and in section about address clauses
(where it belongs).

Cleanup related to the use of packed arrays for bitset operations to
detect uses of uninitialized scalars in GNAT.

gcc/ada/

	* doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst (Packed Types): Remove
	duplicated and wrongly placed paragraph.
	* gnat_rm.texi: Regenerate.
This commit is contained in:
Piotr Trojanek 2022-04-08 23:27:24 +02:00 committed by Pierre-Marie de Rodat
parent 9baae5692b
commit 0f29dfcec2
2 changed files with 0 additions and 14 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gcc/ada/doc/gnat_rm/implementation_advice.rst
View File

@ -353,12 +353,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
subcomponent of the packed type.
"An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
subprograms."
Followed.
.. index:: Address clauses
RM 13.3(14-19): Address Clauses

8
gcc/ada/gnat_rm.texi
View File

@ -14333,14 +14333,6 @@ then values of the type are implicitly initialized to zero. This
happens both for objects of the packed type, and for objects that have a
subcomponent of the packed type.
@quotation
“An implementation should support Address clauses for imported
subprograms.”
@end quotation
Followed.
@geindex Address clauses
@node RM 13 3 14-19 Address Clauses,RM 13 3 29-35 Alignment Clauses,RM 13 2 6-8 Packed Types,Implementation Advice