PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.

* call.c (reference_related_p): Use similar_type_p instead of
	same_type_p.
	(reference_compatible_p): Update implementation to match CWG 2352.
	* cp-tree.h (similar_type_p): Declare.
	* typeck.c (similar_type_p): New.

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr33930.C: Add dg-error.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind1.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind2.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind3.C: New test.
	* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec35.C: Remove dg-error.

From-SVN: r276058
This commit is contained in:
Marek Polacek 2019-09-23 17:37:54 +00:00 committed by Marek Polacek
parent ba2b30dc9f
commit 1a09197cb1
10 changed files with 143 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2019-09-23 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.
* call.c (reference_related_p): Use similar_type_p instead of
same_type_p.
(reference_compatible_p): Update implementation to match CWG 2352.
* cp-tree.h (similar_type_p): Declare.
* typeck.c (similar_type_p): New.
2019-09-22 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/91819 - ICE with operator++ and enum.

View File

@ -1530,9 +1530,8 @@ reference_related_p (tree t1, tree t2)
/* [dcl.init.ref]
Given types "cv1 T1" and "cv2 T2," "cv1 T1" is reference-related
to "cv2 T2" if T1 is the same type as T2, or T1 is a base class
of T2. */
return (same_type_p (t1, t2)
to "cv2 T2" if T1 is similar to T2, or T1 is a base class of T2. */
return (similar_type_p (t1, t2)
|| (CLASS_TYPE_P (t1) && CLASS_TYPE_P (t2)
&& DERIVED_FROM_P (t1, t2)));
}
@ -1545,14 +1544,15 @@ reference_compatible_p (tree t1, tree t2)
/* [dcl.init.ref]
"cv1 T1" is reference compatible with "cv2 T2" if
* T1 is reference-related to T2 or
* T2 is "noexcept function" and T1 is "function", where the
function types are otherwise the same,
and cv1 is the same cv-qualification as, or greater cv-qualification
than, cv2. */
return ((reference_related_p (t1, t2)
|| fnptr_conv_p (t1, t2))
&& at_least_as_qualified_p (t1, t2));
a prvalue of type "pointer to cv2 T2" can be converted to the type
"pointer to cv1 T1" via a standard conversion sequence. */
tree ptype1 = build_pointer_type (t1);
tree ptype2 = build_pointer_type (t2);
conversion *conv = standard_conversion (ptype1, ptype2, NULL_TREE,
/*c_cast_p=*/false, 0, tf_none);
if (!conv || conv->bad_p)
return false;
return true;
}
/* A reference of the indicated TYPE is being bound directly to the

View File

@ -7361,6 +7361,7 @@ enum { ce_derived, ce_type, ce_normal, ce_exact };
extern bool comp_except_specs (const_tree, const_tree, int);
extern bool comptypes (tree, tree, int);
extern bool same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree, tree);
extern bool similar_type_p (tree, tree);
extern bool compparms (const_tree, const_tree);
extern int comp_cv_qualification (const_tree, const_tree);
extern int comp_cv_qualification (int, int);

View File

@ -1530,6 +1530,33 @@ same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree type1, tree type2)
return same_type_p (type1, type2);
}
/* Returns nonzero iff TYPE1 and TYPE2 are similar, as per [conv.qual]. */
bool
similar_type_p (tree type1, tree type2)
{
if (type1 == error_mark_node || type2 == error_mark_node)
return false;
/* Informally, two types are similar if, ignoring top-level cv-qualification:
* they are the same type; or
* they are both pointers, and the pointed-to types are similar; or
* they are both pointers to member of the same class, and the types of
the pointed-to members are similar; or
* they are both arrays of the same size or both arrays of unknown bound,
and the array element types are similar. */
if (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (type1, type2))
return true;
/* FIXME This ought to handle ARRAY_TYPEs too. */
if ((TYPE_PTR_P (type1) && TYPE_PTR_P (type2))
|| (TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type1) && TYPE_PTRDATAMEM_P (type2)))
return comp_ptr_ttypes_const (type1, type2);
return false;
}
/* Returns 1 if TYPE1 is at least as qualified as TYPE2. */
bool

View File

@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
2019-09-23 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr33930.C: Add dg-error.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind1.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind2.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/ref-bind3.C: New test.
* g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec35.C: Remove dg-error.
2019-09-23 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
* gcc.dg/ucnid-5-utf8.c: Skip unless ucn is supported.

View File

@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ int& foo( type&& ggg );
void bar( int* someptr )
{
int& x = foo( someptr );
int& x = foo( someptr ); // { dg-error "cannot bind non-const lvalue reference" }
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
// PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// These should bind directly to ptr, so no -Wreturn-local-addr warnings.
int *ptr;
const int *const &
fn1 ()
{
return ptr;
}
int **const ptr2 = nullptr;
const int *const *const &
fn2 ()
{
return ptr2;
}
int (*ptr3)[10];
using T = const int (*const)[10];
T&
fn3 ()
{
return ptr3;
}
int (**ptr4)[5] = nullptr;
using T2 = const int (*const *const)[5];
T2&
fn4 ()
{
return ptr4;
}
const int **ptr5 = nullptr;
const int *const *const &
fn5 ()
{
return ptr5;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
// PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
// "const int *" and "int *" are reference-related, and 5.4.4.
// says that in that case, if the reference is an rvalue reference,
// the initializer expression shall not be an lvalue.
int &f (const int *&&);
void
fn (int *p)
{
const int *&&r = p; // { dg-error "cannot bind rvalue reference" }
f (p); // { dg-error "cannot bind rvalue reference" }
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
// PR c++/91844 - Implement CWG 2352, Similar types and reference binding.
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
template<typename T> int f (const T *const &); // (1)
template<typename T> int f (T *const &); // (2)
template<typename T> int f (T *); // (3)
/* Before CWG 2352, (2) was a better match than (1), but (2) and (3) were
equally good, so there was an ambiguity. (2) was better than (1) because
(1) required a qualification conversion whereas (2) didn't. But with this
CWG, (1) no longer requires a qualification conversion, because the types
"const int* const" and "int *" are now considered reference-related and we
bind directly, and (1) is more specialized than (2). And (1) is also a
better match than (3). */
void
g (int *p, const int *q, const int *const r)
{
f (p); // calls (1)
f (q); // calls (1)
f (r); // calls (1)
}

View File

@ -14,9 +14,9 @@ template <typename T> int Foo (T &); // { dg-message "note" } candidate
template <typename T> int Qux (T); // { dg-message "note" }
template <typename T> int Qux (T const &); // { dg-message "note" } candidate
template <typename T> int Bar (T const *const &); // { dg-message "note" }
template <typename T> int Bar (T *const &); // { dg-message "note" } candidate
template <typename T> int Bar (T *); // { dg-message "note" } candidate
template <typename T> int Bar (T const *const &);
template <typename T> int Bar (T *const &);
template <typename T> int Bar (T *);
template <typename T> int Baz (T *const &); // { dg-message "note" }
template <typename T> int Baz (T *); // { dg-message "note" } candidate
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ template <typename T> int Baz (T *); // { dg-message "note" } candi
int Baz (int const *ptr, int *ptr2)
{
Baz (ptr2); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
Bar (ptr2); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
Bar (ptr2);
Foo (ptr2); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
Qux (ptr2); // { dg-error "ambiguous" }
return 0;