(aff_combination_expand): Move (T1)(X *+- CST) simplification to ...
(tree_to_aff_combination): ... here. From-SVN: r248955
This commit is contained in:
parent
c18101f5d1
commit
1b92ccde2c
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2017-06-07 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
(aff_combination_expand): Move (T1)(X *+- CST) simplification to ...
|
||||
(tree_to_aff_combination): ... here.
|
||||
|
||||
2017-06-07 Bin Cheng <bin.cheng@arm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (ivopts_estimate_reg_pressure): New
|
||||
|
@ -363,6 +363,33 @@ tree_to_aff_combination (tree expr, tree type, aff_tree *comb)
|
||||
aff_combination_add (comb, &tmp);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
CASE_CONVERT:
|
||||
{
|
||||
tree otype = TREE_TYPE (expr);
|
||||
tree inner = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0);
|
||||
tree itype = TREE_TYPE (inner);
|
||||
enum tree_code icode = TREE_CODE (inner);
|
||||
|
||||
/* In principle this is a valid folding, but it isn't necessarily
|
||||
an optimization, so do it here and not in fold_unary. */
|
||||
if ((icode == PLUS_EXPR || icode == MINUS_EXPR || icode == MULT_EXPR)
|
||||
&& TREE_CODE (itype) == INTEGER_TYPE
|
||||
&& TREE_CODE (otype) == INTEGER_TYPE
|
||||
&& TYPE_PRECISION (otype) > TYPE_PRECISION (itype)
|
||||
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (itype)
|
||||
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (inner, 1)) == INTEGER_CST)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Convert (T1)(X *+- CST) into (T1)X *+- (T1)CST if X's type has
|
||||
undefined overflow behavior. */
|
||||
tree op0 = fold_convert (otype, TREE_OPERAND (inner, 0));
|
||||
tree op1 = fold_convert (otype, TREE_OPERAND (inner, 1));
|
||||
expr = fold_build2 (icode, otype, op0, op1);
|
||||
tree_to_aff_combination (expr, type, comb);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -639,28 +666,10 @@ aff_combination_expand (aff_tree *comb ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
|
||||
exp = XNEW (struct name_expansion);
|
||||
exp->in_progress = 1;
|
||||
*slot = exp;
|
||||
/* In principle this is a generally valid folding, but
|
||||
it is not unconditionally an optimization, so do it
|
||||
here and not in fold_unary. */
|
||||
/* Convert (T1)(X *+- CST) into (T1)X *+- (T1)CST if T1 is wider
|
||||
than the type of X and overflow for the type of X is
|
||||
undefined. */
|
||||
if (e != name
|
||||
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
|
||||
&& INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name))
|
||||
&& TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (TREE_TYPE (name))
|
||||
&& TYPE_PRECISION (type) > TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (name))
|
||||
&& (code == PLUS_EXPR || code == MINUS_EXPR || code == MULT_EXPR)
|
||||
&& TREE_CODE (gimple_assign_rhs2 (def)) == INTEGER_CST)
|
||||
rhs = fold_build2 (code, type,
|
||||
fold_convert (type, gimple_assign_rhs1 (def)),
|
||||
fold_convert (type, gimple_assign_rhs2 (def)));
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
rhs = gimple_assign_rhs_to_tree (def);
|
||||
if (e != name)
|
||||
rhs = fold_convert (type, rhs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
rhs = gimple_assign_rhs_to_tree (def);
|
||||
if (e != name)
|
||||
rhs = fold_convert (type, rhs);
|
||||
|
||||
tree_to_aff_combination_expand (rhs, comb->type, ¤t, cache);
|
||||
exp->expansion = current;
|
||||
exp->in_progress = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user