re PR target/46685 (New stack alignment failures with -fpic)

PR target/46685
	* config/sparc/sparc.c (can_use_mov_pic_label_ref): New predicate.
	(sparc_expand_move): Call it to decide whether to emit the special
	mov{si,di}_pic_label_ref patterns.
	(sparc_legitimize_pic_address): Call it to decide whether to emit
	the regular PIC sequence for labels.  Fix long line.
	(sparc_file_end): Set is_thunk for the PIC helper.

From-SVN: r167395
This commit is contained in:
Eric Botcazou 2010-12-02 22:33:16 +00:00
parent 5b824b7616
commit 205e4c6a4b
4 changed files with 97 additions and 16 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
2010-11-02 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
PR target/46685
* config/sparc/sparc.c (can_use_mov_pic_label_ref): New predicate.
(sparc_expand_move): Call it to decide whether to emit the special
mov{si,di}_pic_label_ref patterns.
(sparc_legitimize_pic_address): Call it to decide whether to emit
the regular PIC sequence for labels. Fix long line.
(sparc_file_end): Set is_thunk for the PIC helper.
2010-12-02 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* tree.c (build_range_type_1): Do not SET_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY
@ -5044,7 +5054,7 @@
2010-11-02 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/46149
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (get_constraint_for_1): Properly handle
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (get_constraint_fop_1): Properly handle
non-indirect MEM_REF variants.
2010-11-02 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>

View File

@ -1025,6 +1025,36 @@ fp_high_losum_p (rtx op)
return 0;
}
/* Return true if the address of LABEL can be loaded by means of the
mov{si,di}_pic_label_ref patterns in PIC mode. */
static bool
can_use_mov_pic_label_ref (rtx label)
{
/* VxWorks does not impose a fixed gap between segments; the run-time
gap can be different from the object-file gap. We therefore can't
assume X - _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is a link-time constant unless we
are absolutely sure that X is in the same segment as the GOT.
Unfortunately, the flexibility of linker scripts means that we
can't be sure of that in general, so assume that GOT-relative
accesses are never valid on VxWorks. */
if (TARGET_VXWORKS_RTP)
return false;
/* Similarly, if the label is non-local, it might end up being placed
in a different section than the current one; now mov_pic_label_ref
requires the label and the code to be in the same section. */
if (LABEL_REF_NONLOCAL_P (label))
return false;
/* Finally, if we are reordering basic blocks and partition into hot
and cold sections, this might happen for any label. */
if (flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
return false;
return true;
}
/* Expand a move instruction. Return true if all work is done. */
bool
@ -1059,14 +1089,9 @@ sparc_expand_move (enum machine_mode mode, rtx *operands)
if (pic_address_needs_scratch (operands[1]))
operands[1] = sparc_legitimize_pic_address (operands[1], NULL_RTX);
/* VxWorks does not impose a fixed gap between segments; the run-time
gap can be different from the object-file gap. We therefore can't
assume X - _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ is a link-time constant unless we
are absolutely sure that X is in the same segment as the GOT.
Unfortunately, the flexibility of linker scripts means that we
can't be sure of that in general, so assume that _G_O_T_-relative
accesses are never valid on VxWorks. */
if (GET_CODE (operands[1]) == LABEL_REF && !TARGET_VXWORKS_RTP)
/* We cannot use the mov{si,di}_pic_label_ref patterns in all cases. */
if (GET_CODE (operands[1]) == LABEL_REF
&& can_use_mov_pic_label_ref (operands[1]))
{
if (mode == SImode)
{
@ -3425,7 +3450,7 @@ sparc_legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, rtx reg)
if (GET_CODE (orig) == SYMBOL_REF
/* See the comment in sparc_expand_move. */
|| (TARGET_VXWORKS_RTP && GET_CODE (orig) == LABEL_REF))
|| (GET_CODE (orig) == LABEL_REF && !can_use_mov_pic_label_ref (orig)))
{
rtx pic_ref, address;
rtx insn;
@ -3478,11 +3503,13 @@ sparc_legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, rtx reg)
}
else
{
pic_ref = gen_const_mem (Pmode,
gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode,
pic_offset_table_rtx, address));
pic_ref
= gen_const_mem (Pmode,
gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode,
pic_offset_table_rtx, address));
insn = emit_move_insn (reg, pic_ref);
}
/* Put a REG_EQUAL note on this insn, so that it can be optimized
by loop. */
set_unique_reg_note (insn, REG_EQUAL, orig);
@ -3520,9 +3547,8 @@ sparc_legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, rtx reg)
return gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, base, offset);
}
else if (GET_CODE (orig) == LABEL_REF)
/* ??? Why do we do this? */
/* Now movsi_pic_label_ref uses it, but we ought to be checking that
the register is live instead, in case it is eliminated. */
/* ??? We ought to be checking that the register is live instead, in case
it is eliminated. */
crtl->uses_pic_offset_table = 1;
return orig;
@ -9453,6 +9479,7 @@ sparc_file_end (void)
DECL_VISIBILITY (decl) = VISIBILITY_HIDDEN;
DECL_VISIBILITY_SPECIFIED (decl) = 1;
allocate_struct_function (decl, true);
cfun->is_thunk = 1;
current_function_decl = decl;
init_varasm_status ();
assemble_start_function (decl, name);

View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2010-11-02 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* gcc.dg/pr46685.c: New test.
2010-12-02 Sebastian Pop <sebastian.pop@amd.com>
PR tree-optimization/45199

View File

@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target freorder } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -freorder-blocks-and-partition -fpic" } */
__attribute__((noinline, noclone))
void bar (void *x)
{
asm volatile ("" : : "r" (x) : "memory");
}
__attribute__((noinline, noclone))
void baz (void)
{
asm volatile ("" : : : "memory");
}
__attribute__((noinline, noclone))
int foo (int x)
{
__label__ lab;
if (__builtin_expect (x, 0))
{
lab:
baz ();
return 2;
}
bar (&&lab);
return 1;
}
int
main (void)
{
int x, i;
asm volatile ("" : "=r" (x) : "0" (0));
for (i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
foo (x);
return 0;
}