OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

re PR java/20215 (gcj does not accept classes with same name fields) 

PR java/20215:
	* include/jvm.h (_Jv_Linker::find_field_helper): Updated.
	* link.cc (find_field_helper): Added 'type' argument.
	(find_field): Updated.

From-SVN: r96032
This commit is contained in:
Tom Tromey 2005-03-07 17:18:33 +00:00 committed by Tom Tromey
parent 7a59efae86
commit 21b2340908
3 changed files with 37 additions and 24 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
libjava/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
2005-03-07 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
PR java/20215:
* include/jvm.h (_Jv_Linker::find_field_helper): Updated.
* link.cc (find_field_helper): Added 'type' argument.
(find_field): Updated.
2005-04-07 Scott Gilbertson <scottg@mantatest.com>
* gnu/gcj/xlib/natXAnyEvent.cc (loadNext): Added timeout.
* gnu/awt/xlib/XCanvasPeer.java (setBackground): Removed

3
libjava/include/jvm.h
View File

@ -250,7 +250,8 @@ namespace gcj
class _Jv_Linker
{
private:
static _Jv_Field *find_field_helper(jclass, _Jv_Utf8Const *, jclass *);
static _Jv_Field *find_field_helper(jclass, _Jv_Utf8Const *, _Jv_Utf8Const *,
jclass *);
static _Jv_Field *find_field(jclass, jclass, _Jv_Utf8Const *,
_Jv_Utf8Const *);
static void prepare_constant_time_tables(jclass);

51
libjava/link.cc
View File

@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ _Jv_Linker::resolve_field (_Jv_Field *field, java::lang::ClassLoader *loader)
// superclasses and interfaces.
_Jv_Field *
_Jv_Linker::find_field_helper (jclass search, _Jv_Utf8Const *name,
_Jv_Utf8Const *type_name,
jclass *declarer)
{
while (search)
@ -108,7 +109,21 @@ _Jv_Linker::find_field_helper (jclass search, _Jv_Utf8Const *name,
for (int i = 0; i < search->field_count; ++i)
{
_Jv_Field *field = &search->fields[i];
if (_Jv_equalUtf8Consts (field->name, name))
if (! _Jv_equalUtf8Consts (field->name, name))
continue;
if (! field->isResolved ())
resolve_field (field, search->loader);
// Note that we compare type names and not types. This is
// bizarre, but we do it because we want to find a field
// (and terminate the search) if it has the correct
// descriptor -- but then later reject it if the class
// loader check results in different classes. We can't just
// pass in the descriptor and check that way, because when
// the field is already resolved there is no easy way to
// find its descriptor again.
if (_Jv_equalUtf8Consts (type_name, field->type->name))
{
*declarer = search;
return field;
@ -119,7 +134,7 @@ _Jv_Linker::find_field_helper (jclass search, _Jv_Utf8Const *name,
for (int i = 0; i < search->interface_count; ++i)
{
_Jv_Field *result = find_field_helper (search->interfaces[i], name,
declarer);
type_name, declarer);
if (result)
return result;
}
@ -155,23 +170,14 @@ _Jv_Linker::find_field (jclass klass, jclass owner,
_Jv_Utf8Const *field_name,
_Jv_Utf8Const *field_type_name)
{
jclass field_type = 0;
if (owner->loader != klass->loader)
{
// FIXME: The implementation of this function
// (_Jv_FindClassFromSignature) will generate an instance of
// _Jv_Utf8Const for each call if the field type is a class name
// (Lxx.yy.Z;). This may be too expensive to do for each and
// every fieldref being resolved. For now, we fix the problem
// by only doing it when we have a loader different from the
// class declaring the field.
field_type = _Jv_FindClassFromSignature (field_type_name->chars(),
klass->loader);
}
// FIXME: this allocates a _Jv_Utf8Const each time. We should make
// it cheaper.
jclass field_type = _Jv_FindClassFromSignature (field_type_name->chars(),
klass->loader);
jclass found_class = 0;
_Jv_Field *the_field = find_field_helper (owner, field_name, &found_class);
_Jv_Field *the_field = find_field_helper (owner, field_name,
field_type->name, &found_class);
if (the_field == 0)
{
@ -186,12 +192,11 @@ _Jv_Linker::find_field (jclass klass, jclass owner,
if (_Jv_CheckAccess (klass, found_class, the_field->flags))
{
// Resolve the field using the class' own loader if necessary.
if (!the_field->isResolved ())
resolve_field (the_field, found_class->loader);
if (field_type != 0 && the_field->type != field_type)
// Note that the field returned by find_field_helper is always
// resolved. There's no point checking class loaders here,
// since we already did the work to look up all the types.
// FIXME: being lazy here would be nice.
if (the_field->type != field_type)
throw new java::lang::LinkageError
(JvNewStringLatin1
("field type mismatch with different loaders"));