From 2730aa7809b47dce47ca0b5e51a6af2164335cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aldy Hernandez Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 12:28:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Mark gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c as XFAIL. It occurs to me that I should not have disabled early jump threading in this test, as it may hide an actual defect. I have reverted my change and XFAILed the test instead. I have also opened a PR101690 to keep track of this problem. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c: Enable early jump threading. Mark as XFAIL. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c index ba872fa23f6..6e1be8937fe 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/shrink-wrap-loop.c @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@ /* { dg-do compile { target { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64 } || { arm_thumb2 } } } } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue" } */ -// { dg-additional-options "-fdisable-tree-ethread" } /* Our new threader is threading things a bit too early, and causing the @@ -69,4 +68,4 @@ test (int *p1, int *p2) return 1; } -/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Performing shrink-wrapping" "pro_and_epilogue" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "Performing shrink-wrapping" "pro_and_epilogue" { xfail *-*-* } } } */