pdp11 - example of a port not needing a speculation barrier
This patch is intended as an example of all that is needed if the target system doesn't support CPUs that have speculative execution. I've chosen the pdp11 port on the basis that it's old enough that this is likely to be true for all existing implementations and that there is also little chance of that changing in future! * config/pdp11/pdp11.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE): Redefine to speculation_safe_value_not_needed. From-SVN: r263176
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3debef336
commit
31f52518d4
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
||||
2018-07-31 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* config/pdp11/pdp11.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE): Redefine
|
||||
to speculation_safe_value_not_needed.
|
||||
|
||||
2018-07-31 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* targhooks.h (speculation_safe_value_not_needed): New prototype.
|
||||
|
@ -291,6 +291,9 @@ static bool pdp11_scalar_mode_supported_p (scalar_mode);
|
||||
|
||||
#undef TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP
|
||||
#define TARGET_INVALID_WITHIN_DOLOOP hook_constcharptr_const_rtx_insn_null
|
||||
|
||||
#undef TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE
|
||||
#define TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_SAFE_VALUE speculation_safe_value_not_needed
|
||||
|
||||
/* A helper function to determine if REGNO should be saved in the
|
||||
current function's stack frame. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user