OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

c++: class scope function lookup [PR105908] 

In r12-1273 for PR91706, I removed the code in get_class_binding that
stripped BASELINK.  This testcase demonstrates that we still need to strip
it in outer_binding before putting the overload set in IDENTIFIER_BINDING,
for compatibility with bindings added directly for declarations.

	PR c++/105908

gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

	* name-lookup.cc (outer_binding): Strip BASELINK.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C: New test.
This commit is contained in:
Jason Merrill 2022-06-22 14:57:21 -04:00
parent 445d8deffb
commit 349a39f061
2 changed files with 21 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gcc/cp/name-lookup.cc
View File

@ -7629,6 +7629,10 @@ outer_binding (tree name,
/* Thread this new class-scope binding onto the
IDENTIFIER_BINDING list so that future lookups
find it quickly. */
if (BASELINK_P (class_binding->value))
/* Don't put a BASELINK in IDENTIFIER_BINDING. */
class_binding->value
= BASELINK_FUNCTIONS (class_binding->value);
class_binding->previous = outer;
if (binding)
binding->previous = class_binding;

17
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing16.C Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
// PR c++/105908
// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
struct test
{
template <typename T>
int templated_func();
template <typename T>
auto call_templated_func() -> decltype(templated_func<T>());
};
template <typename T>
auto test::call_templated_func() -> decltype(templated_func<T>())
{
return templated_func<T>();
}