[Ada] Compute sizes when possible for packed array with Component_Size
gcc/ada/ * layout.adb (Layout_Type): Special case when RM_Size and Esize can be computed for packed arrays.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5478d8a7ae
commit
36fcfed88c
@ -487,6 +487,48 @@ package body Layout is
|
||||
then
|
||||
Set_Alignment (E, Alignment (Component_Type (E)));
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- If packing was requested, the one-dimensional array is constrained
|
||||
-- with static bounds, the component size was set explicitly, and
|
||||
-- the alignment is known, we can set (if not set explicitly) the
|
||||
-- RM_Size and the Esize of the array type, as RM_Size is equal to
|
||||
-- (arr'length * arr'component_size) and Esize is the same value
|
||||
-- rounded to the next multiple of arr'alignment. This is not
|
||||
-- applicable to packed arrays that are implemented specially
|
||||
-- in GNAT, i.e. when Packed_Array_Impl_Type is set.
|
||||
|
||||
if Is_Array_Type (E)
|
||||
and then Number_Dimensions (E) = 1
|
||||
and then not Present (Packed_Array_Impl_Type (E))
|
||||
and then Has_Pragma_Pack (E)
|
||||
and then Is_Constrained (E)
|
||||
and then Compile_Time_Known_Bounds (E)
|
||||
and then Known_Component_Size (E)
|
||||
and then Known_Alignment (E)
|
||||
then
|
||||
declare
|
||||
Abits : constant Int := UI_To_Int (Alignment (E)) * SSU;
|
||||
Lo, Hi : Node_Id;
|
||||
Siz : Uint;
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
Get_Index_Bounds (First_Index (E), Lo, Hi);
|
||||
Siz := (Expr_Value (Hi) - Expr_Value (Lo) + 1)
|
||||
* Component_Size (E);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Do not overwrite a different value of 'Size specified
|
||||
-- explicitly by the user. In that case, also do not set Esize.
|
||||
|
||||
if Unknown_RM_Size (E) or else RM_Size (E) = Siz then
|
||||
Set_RM_Size (E, Siz);
|
||||
|
||||
if Unknown_Esize (E) then
|
||||
Siz := ((Siz + (Abits - 1)) / Abits) * Abits;
|
||||
Set_Esize (E, Siz);
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Even if the backend performs the layout, we still do a little in
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user