Fix PR 101230: ICE in fold_cond_expr_with_comparison

This fixes PR 101230 where I had messed up and forgot that
invert_tree_comparison can return ERROR_MARK if the comparsion
is not invertable (floating point types).

Committed as obvious after a bootstrap/test on x86_64-linux-gnu-gnu

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR middle-end/101230
	* fold-const.c (fold_ternary_loc): Check
	the return value of invert_tree_comparison.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/torture/pr101230-1.c: New test.
This commit is contained in:
Andrew Pinski 2021-06-27 13:14:48 -07:00
parent 3966726333
commit 37ad257c06
2 changed files with 20 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -12837,10 +12837,11 @@ fold_ternary_loc (location_t loc, enum tree_code code, tree type,
tree arg00 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 0);
tree arg01 = TREE_OPERAND (arg0, 1);
comp_code = invert_tree_comparison (comp_code, HONOR_NANS (arg00));
tem = fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (loc, type, comp_code,
arg00,
arg01,
op2, op1);
if (comp_code != ERROR_MARK)
tem = fold_cond_expr_with_comparison (loc, type, comp_code,
arg00,
arg01,
op2, op1);
if (tem)
return tem;
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-signed-zeros" } */
double distance3d_sqr_pt4d_pt4d(void);
int update_r_k_curr_cluster;
void update_r_k(void) {
double curr_distance = distance3d_sqr_pt4d_pt4d();
for (int cluster; cluster; cluster++)
if (0 < curr_distance) {
curr_distance = 0;
update_r_k_curr_cluster = cluster;
}
}