From 417c36cfd620bf2b047852c2aa9ac49004aed2bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 08:03:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] re PR tree-optimization/93210 (Sub-optimal code optimization on struct/combound constexpr (gcc vs. clang)) Regarding test gcc.dg/pr93210.c, on different targets GIMPLE code may slightly differ which is why the scan-tree-dump-times directive may fail. For example, for a RETURN_EXPR on x86_64 we have return 0x11100f0e0d0c0a090807060504030201; whereas on IBM Z the first operand is a RESULT_DECL like = 0x102030405060708090a0c0d0e0f1011; return ; gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/pr93210.c: Adapt regex in order to also support a RESULT_DECL as an operand for a RETURN_EXPR. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c index ec4194b6b49..134d32bc505 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr93210.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* PR tree-optimization/93210 */ /* { dg-do run } */ /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "return \[0-9]\[0-9a-fA-FxX]*;" 31 "optimized" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "(?:return| =) \[0-9]\[0-9a-fA-FxX]*;" 31 "optimized" } } */ #ifdef __SIZEOF_INT128__ typedef unsigned __int128 L;