OpenE2K
/
gcc
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

loop-iv.c (determine_max_iter): Fix handling of AND. 

* loop-iv.c (determine_max_iter): Fix handling of AND.
	(iv_number_of_iterations): Record upper bounds as unsigned
	values.

From-SVN: r192424
This commit is contained in:
Jan Hubicka 2012-10-13 18:50:03 +02:00 committed by Jan Hubicka
parent 544e7e7835
commit 43ffba00cb
2 changed files with 25 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
gcc/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
2012-10-13 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
* loop-iv.c (determine_max_iter): Fix handling of AND.
(iv_number_of_iterations): Record upper bounds as unsigned
values.
2012-10-13 Steven Bosscher <steven@gcc.gnu.org>
* ira.c (ira): Set current_loops to &ira_loops before recording

27
gcc/loop-iv.c
View File

@ -2224,13 +2224,18 @@ determine_max_iter (struct loop *loop, struct niter_desc *desc, rtx old_niter)
rtx niter = desc->niter_expr;
rtx mmin, mmax, cmp;
unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT nmax, inc;
unsigned HOST_WIDEST_INT andmax = 0;
/* We used to look for constant operand 0 of AND,
but canonicalization should always make this impossible. */
gcc_checking_assert (GET_CODE (niter) != AND
|| !CONST_INT_P (XEXP (niter, 0)));
if (GET_CODE (niter) == AND
&& CONST_INT_P (XEXP (niter, 0)))
&& CONST_INT_P (XEXP (niter, 1)))
{
nmax = INTVAL (XEXP (niter, 0));
if (!(nmax & (nmax + 1)))
return nmax;
andmax = UINTVAL (XEXP (niter, 1));
niter = XEXP (niter, 0);
}
get_mode_bounds (desc->mode, desc->signed_p, desc->mode, &mmin, &mmax);
@ -2258,7 +2263,13 @@ determine_max_iter (struct loop *loop, struct niter_desc *desc, rtx old_niter)
if (dump_file)
fprintf (dump_file, ";; improved upper bound by one.\n");
}
return nmax / inc;
nmax /= inc;
if (andmax)
nmax = MIN (nmax, andmax);
if (dump_file)
fprintf (dump_file, ";; Determined upper bound "HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC".\n",
nmax);
return nmax;
}
/* Computes number of iterations of the CONDITION in INSN in LOOP and stores
@ -2563,7 +2574,7 @@ iv_number_of_iterations (struct loop *loop, rtx insn, rtx condition,
? iv0.base
: mode_mmin);
max = (up - down) / inc + 1;
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_shwi (max),
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_uhwi (max),
false, true);
if (iv0.step == const0_rtx)
@ -2776,14 +2787,14 @@ iv_number_of_iterations (struct loop *loop, rtx insn, rtx condition,
desc->const_iter = true;
desc->niter = val & GET_MODE_MASK (desc->mode);
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_shwi (desc->niter),
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_uhwi (desc->niter),
false, true);
}
else
{
max = determine_max_iter (loop, desc, old_niter);
gcc_assert (max);
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_shwi (max),
record_niter_bound (loop, double_int::from_uhwi (max),
false, true);
/* simplify_using_initial_values does a copy propagation on the registers