[arm] PR target/88469 fix incorrect argument passing with 64-bit bitfields

Unfortunately another PCS bug has come to light with the layout of
structs whose alignment is dominated by a 64-bit bitfield element.
Such fields in the type list appear to have alignment 1, but in
reality, for the purposes of alignment of the underlying structure,
the alignment is derived from the underlying bitfield's type.  We've
been getting this wrong since support for over-aligned record types
was added several releases back.  Worse still, the existing code may
generate unaligned memory accesses that may fault on some versions of
the architecture.

I've taken the opportunity to add a few more tests that check the
passing arguments with overalignment in the PCS.  Looking through the
existing tests it looked like they were really only checking
self-consistency and not the precise location of the arguments.

PR target/88469

gcc:
	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_needs_doubleword_align): Return 2 if a record's
	alignment is dominated by a bitfield with 64-bit aligned base type.
	(arm_function_arg): Emit a warning if the alignment has changed since
	earlier GCC releases.
	(arm_function_arg_boundary): Likewise.
	(arm_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise.

gcc/testsuite:
	* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/bitfield1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec1.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec2.c: New test.
	* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec3.c: New test.

From-SVN: r268151
This commit is contained in:
Richard Earnshaw 2019-01-22 14:03:22 +00:00 committed by Richard Earnshaw
parent 50d6ec8cff
commit 44a7251e1e
7 changed files with 150 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
2019-01-22 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
PR target/88469
* config/arm/arm.c (arm_needs_doubleword_align): Return 2 if a record's
alignment is dominated by a bitfield with 64-bit aligned base type.
(arm_function_arg): Emit a warning if the alignment has changed since
earlier GCC releases.
(arm_function_arg_boundary): Likewise.
(arm_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise.
2019-01-22 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/88862

View File

@ -6598,7 +6598,9 @@ arm_init_cumulative_args (CUMULATIVE_ARGS *pcum, tree fntype,
}
}
/* Return 1 if double word alignment is required for argument passing.
/* Return 2 if double word alignment is required for argument passing,
but wasn't required before the fix for PR88469.
Return 1 if double word alignment is required for argument passing.
Return -1 if double word alignment used to be required for argument
passing before PR77728 ABI fix, but is not required anymore.
Return 0 if double word alignment is not required and wasn't requried
@ -6618,7 +6620,8 @@ arm_needs_doubleword_align (machine_mode mode, const_tree type)
return TYPE_ALIGN (TREE_TYPE (type)) > PARM_BOUNDARY;
int ret = 0;
/* Record/aggregate types: Use greatest member alignment of any member. */
int ret2 = 0;
/* Record/aggregate types: Use greatest member alignment of any member. */
for (tree field = TYPE_FIELDS (type); field; field = DECL_CHAIN (field))
if (DECL_ALIGN (field) > PARM_BOUNDARY)
{
@ -6630,6 +6633,13 @@ arm_needs_doubleword_align (machine_mode mode, const_tree type)
Make sure we can warn about that with -Wpsabi. */
ret = -1;
}
else if (TREE_CODE (field) == FIELD_DECL
&& DECL_BIT_FIELD (field)
&& TYPE_ALIGN (DECL_BIT_FIELD_TYPE (field)) > PARM_BOUNDARY)
ret2 = 1;
if (ret2)
return 2;
return ret;
}
@ -6695,7 +6705,12 @@ arm_function_arg (cumulative_args_t pcum_v, machine_mode mode,
inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of type "
"%qT changed in GCC 7.1", type);
else if (res > 0)
pcum->nregs++;
{
pcum->nregs++;
if (res > 1 && warn_psabi)
inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of type "
"%qT changed in GCC 9.1", type);
}
}
/* Only allow splitting an arg between regs and memory if all preceding
@ -6722,6 +6737,9 @@ arm_function_arg_boundary (machine_mode mode, const_tree type)
if (res < 0 && warn_psabi)
inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of type %qT "
"changed in GCC 7.1", type);
if (res > 1 && warn_psabi)
inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of type "
"%qT changed in GCC 9.1", type);
return res > 0 ? DOUBLEWORD_ALIGNMENT : PARM_BOUNDARY;
}
@ -26999,7 +27017,13 @@ arm_setup_incoming_varargs (cumulative_args_t pcum_v,
inform (input_location, "parameter passing for argument of "
"type %qT changed in GCC 7.1", type);
else if (res > 0)
nregs++;
{
nregs++;
if (res > 1 && warn_psabi)
inform (input_location,
"parameter passing for argument of type "
"%qT changed in GCC 9.1", type);
}
}
}
else

View File

@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
2019-01-22 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
PR target/88469
* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/bitfield1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/arm/aapcs/overalign_rec3.c: New test.
2019-01-22 Manfred Schwarb <manfred99@gmx.ch>
* gfortran.dg/array_function_5.f90: Fix a dg directive.

View File

@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
/* Test AAPCS layout (alignment). */
/* { dg-do run { target arm_eabi } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
/* { dg-options "-O" } */
#ifndef IN_FRAMEWORK
#define TESTFILE "bitfield1.c"
struct bf
{
unsigned long long a: 61;
unsigned b: 3;
} v = {1, 1};
#include "abitest.h"
#else
ARG (int, 7, R0)
ARG (int, 9, R1)
ARG (int, 11, R2)
/* Alignment of the bitfield type should affect alignment of the overall
type, so R3 not used. */
LAST_ARG (struct bf, v, STACK)
#endif

View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
/* Test AAPCS layout (alignment). */
/* { dg-do run { target arm_eabi } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
/* { dg-options "-O" } */
#ifndef IN_FRAMEWORK
#define TESTFILE "overalign_rec1.c"
typedef struct __attribute__((aligned(8)))
{
int a;
int b;
} overaligned;
overaligned v = {1, 3};
overaligned w = {33, 99};
#include "abitest.h"
#else
ARG (int, 7, R0)
/* Overalignment is ignored for the purposes of parameter passing. */
ARG (overaligned, v, R1)
ARG (int, 11, R3)
ARG (int, 9, STACK)
LAST_ARG (overaligned, w, STACK+4)
#endif

View File

@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
/* Test AAPCS layout (alignment). */
/* { dg-do run { target arm_eabi } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
/* { dg-options "-O" } */
#ifndef IN_FRAMEWORK
#define TESTFILE "overalign_rec2.c"
typedef struct
{
int __attribute__((aligned(8))) a;
int b;
} overaligned;
overaligned v = {1, 3};
overaligned w = {33, 99};
#include "abitest.h"
#else
ARG (int, 7, R0)
ARG (overaligned, v, R2)
ARG (int, 9, STACK)
LAST_ARG (overaligned, w, STACK+8)
#endif

View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
/* Test AAPCS layout (alignment). */
/* { dg-do run { target arm_eabi } } */
/* { dg-require-effective-target arm32 } */
/* { dg-options "-O" } */
#ifndef IN_FRAMEWORK
#define TESTFILE "overalign_rec3.c"
typedef struct
{
int __attribute__((aligned(16))) a;
int b;
} overaligned;
overaligned v = {1, 3};
overaligned w = {33, 99};
#include "abitest.h"
#else
ARG (int, 7, R0)
/* Objects with alignment > 8 are passed with alignment 8. */
ARG (overaligned, v, R2)
ARG (int, 9, STACK+8)
ARG (int, 10, STACK+12)
ARG (int, 11, STACK+16)
LAST_ARG (overaligned, w, STACK+24)
#endif