libstdc++/70767 Define std::numeric_limits<cv T> in C++98 mode
PR libstdc++/70767 * include/std/limits: Update comments about DRs. (numeric_limits<const _Tp>, numeric_limits<volatile _Tp>, numeric_limits<const volatile _Tp>): Define unconditionally. From-SVN: r235486
This commit is contained in:
parent
5819764843
commit
45e206963a
@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
|
||||
2016-04-27 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR libstdc++/70767
|
||||
* include/std/limits: Update comments about DRs.
|
||||
(numeric_limits<const _Tp>, numeric_limits<volatile _Tp>,
|
||||
numeric_limits<const volatile _Tp>): Define unconditionally.
|
||||
|
||||
2016-04-24 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
|
||||
|
||||
PR libstdc++/70762
|
||||
|
@ -307,9 +307,6 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
|
||||
* representation of a fundamental type on a given platform. For
|
||||
* non-fundamental types, the functions will return 0 and the data
|
||||
* members will all be @c false.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS: DRs 201 and 184 (hi Gaby!) are
|
||||
* noted, but not incorporated in this documented (yet).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
template<typename _Tp>
|
||||
struct numeric_limits : public __numeric_limits_base
|
||||
@ -360,7 +357,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
|
||||
denorm_min() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT { return _Tp(); }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
|
||||
// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
|
||||
// 559. numeric_limits<const T>
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename _Tp>
|
||||
struct numeric_limits<const _Tp>
|
||||
: public numeric_limits<_Tp> { };
|
||||
@ -372,10 +371,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
|
||||
template<typename _Tp>
|
||||
struct numeric_limits<const volatile _Tp>
|
||||
: public numeric_limits<_Tp> { };
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// Now there follow 16 explicit specializations. Yes, 16. Make sure
|
||||
// you get the count right. (18 in c++0x mode)
|
||||
// you get the count right. (18 in C++11 mode, with char16_t and char32_t.)
|
||||
|
||||
// _GLIBCXX_RESOLVE_LIB_DEFECTS
|
||||
// 184. numeric_limits<bool> wording problems
|
||||
|
||||
/// numeric_limits<bool> specialization.
|
||||
template<>
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user