libstdc++: Fix comment in chrono::year::is_leap()
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/chrono (chrono::year::is_leap()): Fix incorrect logic in comment.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8509a50010
commit
4a404f66b0
@ -1606,8 +1606,8 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
|
||||
// [1] https://github.com/cassioneri/calendar
|
||||
// [2] https://accu.org/journals/overload/28/155/overload155.pdf#page=16
|
||||
|
||||
// Furthermore, if y%100 != 0, then y%400==0 is equivalent to y%16==0,
|
||||
// so we can rearrange the expression to (mult_100 ? y % 4 : y % 16)==0
|
||||
// Furthermore, if y%100 == 0, then y%400==0 is equivalent to y%16==0,
|
||||
// so we can simplify it to (!mult_100 && y % 4 == 0) || y % 16 == 0,
|
||||
// which is equivalent to (y & (mult_100 ? 15 : 3)) == 0.
|
||||
// See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2021-June/052815.html
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user