* future.options: Remove. Move to gnu.org web pages.

From-SVN: r74260

gcc/ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2003-12-04  Ben Elliston  <bje@wasabisystems.com>
+
+	* future.options: Remove. Move to gnu.org web pages.
+
 2003-12-03  Eric Christopher  <echristo@redhat.com>
 
 	* c-parse.in (c_in_iteration_stmt, c_in_case_stmt): Move

gcc/future.options

@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
-From: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman)
-To: roland@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Roland McGrath),
-    rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman),
-    jimb@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Jim Blandy),
-    mib@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael Bushnell)
-Cc: cgw@sol.acs.unt.edu (chris williams),
-    clc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Christian Longshore Claiborn)
-Subject: Some gcc options we'd like to see.
-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 93 00:45:09 EST
-Reply-To: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu
-
--Waggravate-return
--Wcast-spell
--Wcaste-align
--Win
--Wmissing-protons
--Wredundant-repetitions
--antsy
--fbungee-jump
--fexpensive-operations
--fextra-strength
--fjesus-saves
--fkeep-programmers-inline
--fno-peeping-toms
--fruit-roll-ups
--fshort-enough
--mno-dialogue
--pedophile
--vomit-frame-pointer
-
-From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
-Date: 06 Jan 2002 17:37:07 -0200
-
-On Jan 2, 2002, in a long, heated thread concerning the interpretation
-of certain passages of the C standard, jtv <jtv@xs4all.nl> wrote:
-
-> (Yes, I'm a pedant.  I'm pining for the day when gcc will support the
-> options "-ffascist -Wanal")
-
-How about introducing the options `-flame -War' :-)