Fix comments/ChangeLog entry for last night's change.
From-SVN: r26320
This commit is contained in:
parent
5e4df1ae8b
commit
4f282ba1e9
@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ Thu Apr 8 19:20:18 1999 Jeffrey A Law (law@cygnus.com)
|
||||
Do not try to optimize a aggregate address which has VOIDmode.
|
||||
Mirrors March 23 change to expand_assignment.
|
||||
|
||||
* flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require an edge to
|
||||
be marked with EDGE_FALLTHRU when tidying an edge which connects
|
||||
consecutive basic blocks.
|
||||
* flow.c (delete_unreachable_blocks): Do not require EDGE_FALLTHRU
|
||||
for an edge when tidying an edge which connects consecutive basic
|
||||
blocks.
|
||||
|
||||
* flow.c (can_delete_label_p): Do not convert a label into a
|
||||
deleted label here.
|
||||
|
@ -1563,10 +1563,9 @@ delete_unreachable_blocks ()
|
||||
out edge for the block which ended with the conditional
|
||||
branch (since we do not create duplicate edges).
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, because we create the edge for the jump to the
|
||||
label before the fallthrough edge, we will only see the
|
||||
jump edge. So we do not want to check that the edge is a
|
||||
FALLTHRU edge. */
|
||||
Furthermore, the edge will be marked as a fallthru because we
|
||||
merge the flags for the duplicate edges. So we do not want to
|
||||
check that the edge is not a FALLTHRU edge. */
|
||||
if ((s = b->succ) != NULL
|
||||
&& s->succ_next == NULL
|
||||
&& s->dest == c)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user